Mafia in La-La Land (Game over!)

Mehdi2277 · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:13 am

Town VI based purely on numbers. So far all he's done to me looks like usual PM and nothing alignment telling for him.

DeasVail · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:14 am

In post 675, Mehdi2277 wrote:Town VI based purely on numbers. So far all he's done to me looks like usual PM and nothing alignment telling for him.

Have you seen him as scum?

Mehdi2277 · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:22 am

No, which is why I mentioned if someone wants to do a meta case on him I could consider it. I've seen several of his town games and so far I don't think he's acting much different then usual.

Bitmap · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:25 pm

Possible scum slip:

In post 636, PMysterious wrote:I'll get you for this Matt. I liked you until now.

Back to GW2!

PMysterious · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:51 pm

[quote="In post 674, DeasVail"]671

PMysterious:

Have you played in a game with a dayvig before? Also, do you have any completed games as scum? /quote]

I never played with a Day Vig in play before, but I do have a completed game as scum.

MattP · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:54 pm

How was that a scum slip, Bitmap? Why is it suddenly a "possible" scumslip?

petapan · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:52 pm

the "i'll get you for this" tonally seems more likely to come from upset scum than town but it's p. weak tbh

idk i'm annoyed because i have this huge scumlurkinginthebackgroundbutnoonewantstovotethem feeling

Bitmap · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:53 pm

In post 680, MattP wrote:How was that a scum slip, Bitmap? Why is it suddenly a "possible" scumslip?

Gut... and the way I heard that phrase seemed like PM was saying "Curse you for killinh scum me."

Shiidaji · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:59 pm

In post 681, petapan wrote:the "i'll get you for this" tonally seems more likely to come from upset scum than town but it's p. weak tbh

idk i'm annoyed because i have this huge scumlurkinginthebackgroundbutnoonewantstovotethem feeling

Who. Why aren't you on them if we have an extended deadline?

-

Regardless of PM's alignment I'm liking BitmapScum right now, 678 + his voteposts are way too contrived and the "Back to my game!" bit felt really forced.

Bitmap · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:15 pm

Can't blame a man for being addicted to video games.

And honestly, I think that PMyst is scum from his and MattP interactions. But meh.

petapan · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:39 pm

In post 683, Shiidaji wrote:Who. Why aren't you on them if we have an extended deadline?

extended deadline doesn't mean much when activity is generally low and kondi still hasn't been replaced. i'm not on them because i got swayed to vote the guy that i am voting right now

petapan · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:39 pm

bitmap being paranoid of matt is probably a town-tell

MattP · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:19 pm

In post 686, petapan wrote:bitmap being paranoid of matt is probably a town-tell

Oh fucking shit I forgot about this.

Bitmap is town

DeasVail · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:48 pm

Eh, I disagree. I'm going to be a bit more careful with reading you after that, but I didn't suddenly think you were scum or anything. I could see myself doing something similar to bitmap as scum though.

Petapan:

Why is being swayed still the reason when the one who swayed you is voting for someone else?

Staeg · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:42 am

DV, why is shamrock scum and how would you compare this to history mafia?

DeasVail · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:08 am

I don't know about Shamrock. I've found Shamrock's posting slightly town, but I think the 'wow' thing is scummy because how he justifies his vote later (and implies that he didn't think what happened recently was important) contradicts with him saying 'wow'.

Before History Mafia ended I remember thinking I didn't find Shamrock scummy in the ways that I thought he was there, but at the same time, I didn't have a strong townread. I still think his play is a bit different, but I don't think it necessarily means he's scum, and meta just confuses me anyway. Was there something else you wanted me to compare to History Mafia?

Staeg · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:41 am

In post 690, DeasVail wrote:Was there something else you wanted me to compare to History Mafia?

No, not really - the fact that you said "That was scummy." with nothing to follow it up at all, whilst apparently having a townread on the poster seemed peculiar.

Konowa · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:42 am

unvote;
Vote: PMysterious

Having a hard time garnering any sort of umph for this game.

petapan · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:52 am

In post 688, DeasVail wrote:Petapan: Why is being swayed still the reason when the one who swayed you is voting for someone else?

they are?

Shamrock · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:52 am

In post 690, DeasVail wrote:I don't know about Shamrock. I've found Shamrock's posting slightly town, but I think the 'wow' thing is scummy because how he justifies his vote later (and implies that he didn't think what happened recently was important) contradicts with him saying 'wow'.

Meh, I didn't phrase that post very well. The "wow" was indeed a reaction to PM's recent posts, particularly the one Matt "daykilled" him for; I selfquoted to point out to reck that I'd already been voting/suspecting PM earlier, since he (reck) doesn't seem to be paying much attention to the game.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:07 am

the post you are referring to doesn't warrant a 'wow' reaction imo.

In post 671, Shamrock wrote:

In post 378, Shamrock wrote:fence sitting and trying to be cute about it

except there was no fencesitting in that post. he was asking for an explanation.

vote shamrock

DeasVail · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:36 am

In post 693, petapan wrote:they are?

I thought it was Matt, and he's voting PM I think. Was it someone else?

petapan · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:38 am

i am also voting pmysterious?

Shamrock · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:08 pm

In post 695, 4nxi3ty wrote:except there was no fencesitting in that post. he was asking for an explanation.

Huh?

PMysterious · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:21 pm

I don't wanna be lynched Day 1. I didn't mean for it to happen that way. I was not upset at Matt at all, I was just overreacting. Give me all of the questions you can pull at me besides asking for me to claim and I'll get all of them in 1 post.