[/b]Andrius wrote:Vas, alliances aren't inherentlly bad, especially if recruited masons can't become recruited into the cult afterwards. :/
Would you like to point out the flaw in this argument yourself, Andrius?
VV and parama are obvtown.
[/b]Andrius wrote:Vas, alliances aren't inherentlly bad, especially if recruited masons can't become recruited into the cult afterwards. :/
<3Exe wrote: I think the Andy + Parama + Exe combo is beast mode
Don't buy it. I play to win, not to have fun. You have fun when you win. So lets win and then have fun. And I don't find jokes in mafia games funny.Andrius wrote:Mod: Limited Acess until TuesdayI'm living in someone else's room for the weekend, and its an odd living arragement. Spamtastic posting will resume Tuesday. :/
@ cooldog: I tend to post in high-velocity when I have time.
@ cooldog: You don't seem to know me at all. xD I like being overly "yaaay!! " and friendly D1, and I like to joke around. Exe and I have a personal history of me distrusting him despite a scum-read. If I start an alliance it will go something like this: "ALLIANCE TIME: MEMBERS ARE MITH, FLAY, VRK." I do post fluff D1, its now I play. Read Blackest Night Mafia D1; my posts. Same deal, I was ovtown.
@AV: I love joking around. DEAL.
<3Exe wrote: I think the Andy + Parama + Exe combo is beast mode
I love alliances; its definitely not happening now.
@ Kat: I just came out of BNM where MASONS AND SCUM could get recruited into a Cult. I'm a little wary of cults now, and have good reason to be so.
"Its the best page 2 read you can get" - what do you mean by this? I honestly cannot parse it in a way that makes proper sense. Saw your edit re: unselfconscious/selfconscious.CooLDoG wrote:vote:andriusseems fidgety, unselfconscious of play, and its the best page 2 read you can get. Too bad I missed my policy kat vote for being a dick.
DUDE I AM NOT BUDDYING HOW COULD YOU POSSIBLY ACCUSE ME OF THAT?Exe wrote: Parama, why do you hate my love for you?
I never said you were town. I think you're exaggerating the seriousness of the alliance.
. . . or Cult leader. M just saying.chesskid3 wrote:I don't suck, but there is a perception that I do.
So i'm not going to get culted
therefore I'm really really town.
Hm? What act and why not?Nachomamma8 wrote:Andy might as well be obvtown. He can't keep this act up forever if he's scum.
If you think it sounded awkward I dunno what to tell you; it was the phrasing that came to mind. 'Nice' was meant to be fairly sarcastic - that is, it's set up to look all long and pretty as a post so early in the game, looking like it's brimming with something useful. But with no conclusions, it seems more like intentionally trying to look useful but not actually something with useful conclusions applied. That said it was possible that Andrius meant to put in useful conclusions or imply ones that didn't come across (see my response to him above), so I wanted to poke around (and heNachomamma8 wrote:"Hm, well then, Andy, lemme just ask" sounds awkward as hell.
How is setup speculation "nice" if it doesn't go anywhere?
Finally, why the hell aren't these questions accompanied with a vote?
Plum is very likely the Cult Recruiter. And keep in mind that if we lynch her tomorrow after Exe and she flips Recruiter, I should be masoned/lynched the next day immediately.
And why don't you vote for me then, if you agree with Nacho's read on me? Why are you happy about the prospect of an Alliance on Page 2 and sure it's definitely not happening by Page 4?Andrius wrote:Oh, yeah, let's just let the Cult Recruiter get killed by the potentially-non-existant mafia. Seriously though, why don't we just lynch her if we think she's C.R.?
Regarding what? I think I pinpointed the post and am fairly uncertain what you're referring to here.AurorusVox wrote:Ehm, debating a VV vote at this point. Is he misreading or misrepping? :\
Why wait - it sounds like either of them were better suspects than Exe from your point of view by that point. Whose permission are you waiting for here?AurorusVox wrote:I left my vote there because "in that case" (i.e. under Andy's description) your reason wouldn't stack up, but I wanted to hear what you had to say about alliances before making a change. After waiting and you not responding, I've been considering moving to one of VV or Andy.
I gotta' show off my amazing skills for the Head Mason dude. Since I can't suck up to him directly I'm going to just be amazingly ovtown.Plum wrote: Andy: Eh, it was/is of mild concern that you had a relatively large wall early in the game which was speculation without, as far as I could see, any potential for prompting the sort of conflict useful so early in the game or any 'what does this mean for scumhunting today' quality that I could see, and frankly you didn't seem that concerned about the latter even in your follow-up, where I was vaguely thinking you might mention a possible conclusion (like 'we should look for group-scum tells to catch the Cult even Day 1', your speculation being probable).
It was sarcasm. I agree with the read, but him not voting you instantly makes me question his methods. Because if I thought you were CR then I'd vote you. I agree with the read but him not following up on it is scummy. CRs don't like stepping on toes; iss a good way to push your lynch and at the same time not shove a wagon to bear down right away.Plum wrote: And why don't you vote for me then, if you agree with Nacho's read on me? Why are you happy about the prospect of an Alliance on Page 2 and sure it's definitely not happening by Page 4?
Reaallly now? ~*o*~Andy wrote:I don't think I'm selfconscious of my play. I'm not usually. Except as scum. I'll sit there for tens of minutes making sure my posts are shiny and townie. <3
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
Sarcasm of this type is usually disguised honesty. I now believe you are actually the cult leader. Good job.chesskid3 wrote:yeah plum i'm the cult leader
you got me
you go girl
This is actually untrue.Parama wrote:Sarcasm of this type is usually disguised honesty. I now believe you are actually the cult leader. Good job.chesskid3 wrote:yeah plum i'm the cult leader
you got me
you go girlunvote, vote: chesskid3
Regarding Andy's play concerning the alliance shenanigan. He seems to be saying "Oh yeah Andy is scummy for this" when really it was Exe who was the more prominent, or so is the general perception - who he hasn't mentioned yet at all.Plum wrote:Regarding what? I think I pinpointed the post and am fairly uncertain what you're referring to here.AurorusVox wrote:Ehm, debating a VV vote at this point. Is he misreading or misrepping? :\
Plum wrote:Why wait - it sounds like either of them were better suspects than Exe from your point of view by that point. Whose permission are you waiting for here?AurorusVox wrote:I left my vote there because "in that case" (i.e. under Andy's description) your reason wouldn't stack up, but I wanted to hear what you had to say about alliances before making a change. After waiting and you not responding, I've been considering moving to one of VV or Andy.
I thought I'd see whether there was a different view on alliances that might account for Parama's suspicion. And while I was then deciding between the two of them, I didn't want to unvote while I decided. Why are you allowed to not switch your vote, but I have to do so immediately?Plum wrote:I could've switched my vote to him, sure, but I didn't feel like it and didn't think I'd gain or lose anything by it.
Soo, waiting for an answer to a question before I decide whether something is scummy or not is also bad play? Why are you so impatient? If Nacho has a good explanation for why he thinks you are CR instead of mafia, then he isn't scummy. If he doesn't have a reason - or has a bad reason - I would find him scummy. There's no need to speculate on his scumminess before he's answered my question.Plum wrote:AV's scumhunting in this game, such as it has been, has beenhugelypassive[/i]. Thirteen posts this game and he seems uninvested in his own scumhunting - he's not noticing off things or potential scumtells himself and sheeps to cover any ground at all (and/or any off thing he himself does notice don't get attention from him at all - he questions Nacho re: why he has me as CR and not Mafia, but doesn't put him down on the list of two people he's considering moving his vote onto when Parama asks, and this sort of sheeping works in conjunction with the above AV quote). His two votes have been based on discrepancies or scumtells noticed by other people and latched onto by him - his vote on Exe came after Parama's comment on something Exe didbeforeAV's previous post; same thing with CD's discrepancy in Andrius' posting.
Ohh yeah man. I'm turning over a new leaf and trying to play better. My last game with you I played horrid. Some of my newer games you will see that I'm getting better at this game. But other then that you did a very fine job at not answering to my points. Answer to your apparent contradiction.Exe wrote:Lol, who is this and where is the real cooldog? You trying a new strat bro? You used to be pretty obvious as scum ...
^To clarify: who he haAurorusVox wrote:Regarding Andy's play concerning the alliance shenanigan. He seems to be saying "Oh yeah Andy is scummy for this" when really it was Exe who was the more prominent, or so is the general perception - who he hasn't mentioned yet at all.
Ender on Page 3 wrote:Sorry no more on-going game talk shouldn't have said that.
There is no point of doing an alliance to be honest, what is the alliance members turn out to be cult and they sneak in to the alliance.
Why did it take you a full day to decide whether you found Andy scummy when you already understood the reasons in your previous post?Ender on page 4 wrote:VOTE: Andrius
Even i know alliances are bad and this could be just him trying to keep safe and not lynched because he is scum.