Mini 1127 Cult vs Masons OVER. TOWN WINS

VasudeVa · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:06 pm

^^AHahaha. Now there's a game idea.

1Mason-Loverizer, 1Cult-Loverizer. 11 VTs. No claims. WHO WILL WIN?

AdumbroDeus · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:50 am

My lynch was incredibly dumb still, you guys never answered the question of whether town in my situation would do it (essentially post reads piecemail) especially considering it could've created a quicklynch.

Still, you applied the same type of reasoning to exe and killed him, so can't complain too much.

Exe · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:17 am

UGH.

I hate that the reasons for wanting me lynched were:

A mod question that I ACTUALLY WANTED THE ANSWER TO. <<Not related to my alignment.
A joke about an alliance. <<Not related to my alignment

UGH

ALSO I TOLD YOU ALL THAT THERE WAS NO MAFIA BUT NO ONE FUCKING BELIEVED ME.

Exe · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:20 am

Also, </3 Parama for betraying me... -_-

Parama · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:41 am

Exe, I had two options:
1. Get lynched and lose as cult
2. Claim and get masoned, win as town

Either way, cult loses d(''d)

chesskid3 · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:42 am

SK is mafia :teach:

Exe · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:08 am

chesskid3 wrote:SK is mafia :teach:

No it's not...Mafia is mafia. Cult is cult. SK is SK.

All can be loosely categorized as "scum."

But all 3 have very different tells, hence mafia =/= SK.

AdumbroDeus · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:30 am

chesskid3 wrote:SK is mafia :teach:

SK tells are not mafia tells, they have no associative tells to speak of.

Cult is definitely not like SK in terms of tells, TOTALLY different mentality.

There are some general scumtells, but as a whole, people treating all scumhunting as the same is part of why town sucks against cult for the most part.

chesskid3 · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:37 am

SK tells and mafia tells are p. similar
the ones i use anyway

gandalf5166 · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:59 am

LOL

ANDY WAS MASON RECRUITER

EPIC WIN

Andrius · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:12 pm

gandalf5166 wrote:LOL

ANDY WAS MASON RECRUITER

EPIC WIN

*bows*

CooLDoG · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:55 pm

okay, I'm semi-back from my v/la. I won't be fully back until Friday evening. I'll be catching up...

chesskid3 · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:55 pm

CooLDoG · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:11 pm

Shut up, I was posting the same thing in all my games. Yay we won!

Parama · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:17 pm

^scum with Andy

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:35 pm

Exe wrote:UGH.

I hate that the reasons for wanting me lynched were:

A mod question that I ACTUALLY WANTED THE ANSWER TO. <<Not related to my alignment.
A joke about an alliance. <<Not related to my alignment

UGH

ALSO I TOLD YOU ALL THAT THERE WAS NO MAFIA BUT NO ONE FUCKING BELIEVED ME.

That's not why I lynched you

AdumbroDeus wrote:My lynch was incredibly dumb still, you guys never answered the question of whether town in my situation would do it (essentially post reads piecemail) especially considering it could've created a quicklynch.

Still, you applied the same type of reasoning to exe and killed him, so can't complain too much.

Sorry about your lynch

.
I felt that you were town based on reactions to pressure, but I didn't think I could get Plum lynched based on the case I had, and I was starting to get paranoid that Exe could be Mason Recruiter, so I went with the safe lynch

AdumbroDeus · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:52 am

Nachomamma8 wrote:
Exe wrote:UGH.

I hate that the reasons for wanting me lynched were:

A mod question that I ACTUALLY WANTED THE ANSWER TO. <<Not related to my alignment.
A joke about an alliance. <<Not related to my alignment

UGH

ALSO I TOLD YOU ALL THAT THERE WAS NO MAFIA BUT NO ONE FUCKING BELIEVED ME.
That's not why I lynched you

Hi Xivii, care to explain why you got him lynched?

Nachomamma8 wrote:
AdumbroDeus wrote:My lynch was incredibly dumb still, you guys never answered the question of whether town in my situation would do it (essentially post reads piecemail) especially considering it could've created a quicklynch.

Still, you applied the same type of reasoning to exe and killed him, so can't complain too much.
Sorry about your lynch .
I felt that you were town based on reactions to pressure, but I didn't think I could get Plum lynched based on the case I had, and I was starting to get paranoid that Exe could be Mason Recruiter, so I went with the safe lynch

FML

I suspected that people didn't think I was scum anymore and that my wagon was driven by scum and people who chose a null read over a scum read cause the deadline was looming and didn't think they could agree on somebody scummy before then.

Ah well, c'est la vie.

Oh...

@parama: Ok, this is seriously your meta? I find it wierd in comparison to other games I checked of yours, but if so... it's one of the most anti-town metas ever.

Parama · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:11 am

I dunno what you mean by "my meta" but I wasn't the one who got lynched D1 anyways so

AdumbroDeus · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:32 am

Parama wrote:I dunno what you mean by "my meta" but I wasn't the one who got lynched D1 anyways so

I was taken as a contigency lynch out of a case that had no content because of deadline.

I know at least chesskid and nacho were pretty sure i was town and voted for my lynch anyway, and I had 2 scum on the wagon.

The only reason i got lynched (probably period) was cause i was late to the party.

Regardless, your meta of having no real case on people, that's what I don't like.

Parama · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:44 am

I point to my ISOs #26 and #27.

AdumbroDeus · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:56 am

Parama wrote:I point to my ISOs #26 and #27.

After i had substantially prodded you based on the fact that you had no content....

Parama · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:11 am

Those were all quotes of stuff I'd said prior. For the most part at least.

hasdgfas · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:20 am