RBT wrote:OHAY, CHECK THIS OUT
CLAIM:Miller
Just so y'all know.
Check this out – why didn’t you claim in your first post as opposed to now?
Yes I know KDub also asked but this way you have to see one of them.
--
Zodiark wrote:If Iec confirms that the two of your are lovers, I would say the two of them are confirmed town. Either that or are scum together.
Have you ever played with Fate before? Serious question.
--
@Iec
– Why in 73 did you continue to harp on the avatar angle and ignore actual relevant game events? Why did you ignore the Prana case?
--
DTM wrote:I will list:
Snipped list
Reboot Mafia. All of these are games we were in together.
I don’t disagree with the point you are making but why include Reboot Mafia on that list. You replaced in and were killed before you even made a content post. Hardly worth mentioning as to a game Iec should be relying on for judgements. Especially with so many other games that appear to be valid for purposes of your argument.
DTM wrote:What do we have here, do I see some back tracking? Oh yes, how can Fate be Fate when the whole meta argument was Fate is behaving abnormally . Bringing this point up and dropping it is quote sloppy. Honestly if you did care about this, I would expect you to attack Fate/Vezok link theory while you were making the Prana case. If you place the condition that if either player (specifically Vezok) flips scum we should look closer to the other, I agree that this link is possible. I disagree that you should drop it. There's this thing called: attacking multiple people. You know, what I do.
Yes, I’m totally incapable of attacking multiple people. That’s why I’m questioning Iec’s play while voting Prana
I said nothing about Fate behaving abnormally. Don’t put words in my mouth. I said that it was interesting that he chose to ignore Vezok’s baby wagon. Based on whatever Vezok flips there may be useful information there. Nothing more, nothing less. Certainly that post is not inherently scummy as the relational inferences are dependant on an unknown flip.
DTM wrote: 2. I wouldn't consider 4 votes a wagon. Fate and Ice together aren't quad voters pulling out all the stops man. I find it odd that you focus on Prana who attacked you rather then look at the Fate wagon likewise.
Nice attempt to move away the discussion from reality. The point is not that the wagon is full on with tons of votes. The case is that Prana was very quick to make a serious vote based on nothing at all. Why should I be looking at Fate’s ‘wagon’ when it contained 100% RVS votes? There’s a clear differentiation that I don’t understand you ignoring.
Also, are you trying to allude that I’m OMGUSing Prana? If so is that a scum tell?
DTM wrote:Fate I disagree with because of above. How can you both argue Fate is acting like Fate when your meta argument is a point that goes AGAINST THAT.
Bzzzt. Fate is being Fate because he’s voting for me based on past history, IMO. The ‘meta evidence’ as I explained above, is a relational tell that may bear fruit later based on Vezok’s flip.
That reminds me –
Daykill: Vezok
DTM wrote:Ice voting in self preservation is a scum argument against him actually.
Stating that self-preservation is a scummy reaction is highly overrated when Iec wasn’t even being voted. Iec is scummy for focusing solely on 'avatar-gate' and ignoring actual game events but this is very weak reasoning.
DTM wrote:Prana himself didn't OUTLINE A REASON. That I agree. Your OVERALL CASE IS FULL OF HOLES MAN. HOLES THAT SEZ YOU ARE STRETCHING THINGS LULZ. This is 3 pages in and you're already attacking people on this "4 man wagon" who so happens to be on you. Lulz. I expect a rebuttal soon but I like this MoI pressure.
Lulz yourself. The only thing you have to say is you agree with the reasoning then spend the rest of the Prana paragraph saying “YUZ IS STRETCHING”.
Is pressure early, which by definitition has to be a stretch (as is your ‘case’, BTW ), a scum-tell?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
