ender241 wrote:I'm going to VOTE: FinalFires this is because the "powerful townie" hint suggests to me that he's making people not want to vote him just incase he's a power role something mafia would do at the moment. The noob trick isn't a good sign either, everyone is told that if they've never done a mafia game to do a noob game and he plays like he knows what to do.
FoS: ender241ender241 wrote:UNVOTE: Finalfires It's way to early to lynch so i'm going to unvote just incase he is a newbie.
Thank you I was wondereing where I pulled that name from.Jahudo wrote:I just noticed that Empking's signup page had 15 people /in, the #9 slot was used twice. So somehow that meant Flinter is not in the game even though she did /in?
Like any other RVS vote? What other info could you gain from my vote?DLG wrote:Yep, that is strange. I don't know what to make of rekirtS vote even more, now.
Because it was a vote on a player not in the game, it was out of the ordinary. Out of the ordinary equals worth looking at. Jahudo pointed out the /in page discrepancy but, I still wanted to hear from you about it.rekirtS wrote:Like any other RVS vote? What other info could you gain from my vote?
then straight away unvoted because he was a newbie which was one of the reasons u voted for himender241 wrote:I'm going to VOTE: FinalFires this is because the "powerful townie" hint suggests to me that he's making people not want to vote him just incase he's a power role something mafia would do at the moment. The noob trick isn't a good sign either, everyone is told that if they've never done a mafia game to do a noob game and he plays like he knows what to do.
Then tried explaining away the action by the new excuse of saying u thought it 5 votesender241 wrote:UNVOTE: Finalfires It's way to early to lynch so i'm going to unvote just incase he is a newbie.
Then under pressure voted againender241 wrote:Fair does, sorry i got used to the 5 to lynch idea.
Now i dont think these are major scum tells , but to quote ''the noob trick isn't a good sign either'' you will alienate other players and pick up votes.ender241 wrote:Why? Because i realised he was on 4 votes and thought it was too early for a lynch and unvoted...
Did you miss the part where he said he played mafia on a different forum that used different rules (ex: 24 hour days)?ender241 wrote:It depends what you mean by him being a noob, he said he's a noob to this forum so he knows how to play so think before and decide what you mean by noob.
Do you have a reason for voting Jahudo?Nikanor wrote:Vote: Jahudo.
Don't worry Fires. I believe you.
At this stage, a vote on Yos to get a bandwagon going isn't scummy at all, but a long drawn out post (like yours) is pointless this early becacuse there is so little info to go on.Final Fires wrote:Wouldn't a long, drawn out post accusing others of being scum look much more scummy than simply voting for yos? My motives weren't to look 'less scummy', but instead point out an observation I made, for what I thought was a better vote.
If you view Final Fires as town, then does that make the people who vote for him scummier, even if just by a little bit?Pom wrote:Honestly, I simply meant to tell you to stop being so serious, and although it may have seemed hostile, it wasn't meant to be. I have a null-overeager-newb read on you ATM.
I should have asked him as well, but I missed him. Sorry, my bad.DLG wrote:@ Bub Bidderskins
Why did you point out what DarlaBlueEyes had done, but give no attention to MoreWhisky who had done basically the same thing?
What is this supposed to mean?MoreWhisky wrote:That bought out the scummy behaviour, my vote on Yos stands.
Two of you asked this.Bub Bidderskins wrote:And last but not least...
What is this supposed to mean?MoreWhisky wrote:That bought out the scummy behaviour
