Guderian (1) - Plum
StrangerCoug
Nachomamma8
CooLDog
TheButtonmen
Internet Stranger
Plum (3) - Internet Stranger, TheButtonmen, Guderian
Not Voting: StrangerCoug, Nachomamma8, CooLDog,
With seven alive its four to lynch.
This is not necessarily true. However, I like your points on nacho.Guderian wrote:LC was such an organic wagon I would be really surprised if there was any mafia on it. It only took 3 pages, Im sure the scum buddy would try and slow it down somehow, mess around etc, etc.
Totally irrelevant vote here. SCUMVote: TheButtonmen
Still hasn't answered my question.
Still is scum.
So why aren't you voting the busser? whoever that is. TBM was the first person to vote LC You nk of jerbs makes sense, you want to distribute blame about the LC wagon and claim scum bussing.inclined to bus in a quicklynch situation.
No. At this point, the town had began to move against LC. TBM accused SC of bandwagoning without a case, but kept his vote on. That way, he was encouraging an SC bandwagon without being criticized for getting off the LC wagon.Guderian wrote:Totally irrelevant vote here. SCUM
D1 lasted 48 hours. And IIRC, Jerbs didn't get the chance to post a whole lot either. IRRELEVANTGuderian wrote:You posted very little day one, which is scummy. SCUM
I am voting the busser. As scum, I wouldn't want to give up my first place spot on my buddy's wagon either.Guderian wrote:So why aren't you voting the busser? whoever that is. TBM was the first person to vote LC You nk of jerbs makes sense, you want to distribute blame about the LC wagon and claim scum bussing.
Why not? It was an RVS-style vote (later he tried to make it seem like something more, but he never pushed Jerbs, really) and Jerbs got no attention. I don't think the Jerbs kill correlates either negatively or positively to the possibility of scum-Guderian.StrangerCoug wrote:Guderian guns Jerbs first, then starts switching off to Lord Cable. Given Jerbs was the Night 1 kill, Guderian as scum makes no sense to me.
I posted regarding LC's refusal to claim at 10:56 pm. I got off the computer at probably 1:00 am. That's a little over two hours, and not too many people who might have wanted to weigh in/we'd have wanted to weigh in (like Nacho, maybe, or Jerbs - basically, plenty of people who hadn't been around since the LC wagon took off) had shown up. So I went to sleep and had a busy Sunday, and when I arrived home LC had been hammered. In context, I wanted a little more pre-hammer discussion to go on and figured it was worth waiting a bit more than two odd hours to see if more of that could be accomplished before a hammer. I already knew what I wanted: I wanted LC lynched. The fact that it was four of my posts does't say anything aout realtime timeframe or my intentions in regards to the time spent.CooLDoG wrote:@plum you say you never had a chance at the hammer, how about posts 4-7 (on your iso)? You had plenty of time to think over the hammer...
To me, killing your attackee when you're the last scum is suicide. I must note that the WIFOM possibility exists, but that's my current state of mind.Plum wrote:Why not? It was an RVS-style vote (later he tried to make it seem like something more, but he never pushed Jerbs, really) and Jerbs got no attention. I don't think the Jerbs kill correlates either negatively or positively to the possibility of scum-Guderian.StrangerCoug wrote:Guderian guns Jerbs first, then starts switching off to Lord Cable. Given Jerbs was the Night 1 kill, Guderian as scum makes no sense to me.
If every lynch and nightkill in a 6:3 mountainous is on a townie, the Mafia will win on Day 2. On the other hand, town can't eliminate all the Mafia until Day 3 even with perfect play. Your attack here is unreasonable.Internet Stranger wrote:Guderian, I always assume three scum. Why would you assume two? Why does it matter? Your actions are the scummiest of them all now.