Apologies in advance for Mastinizing your post, Phlight.
Phlight wrote:Assuming we have a cop and a doctor is a terrible idea.
I wasn't assuming both - hell, I wasn't even assuming we necessarily had either (there's a reason I said "a" cop/doc instead of "the" cop/doc).
Phlight wrote:Later, if the mason partner dies, he can point to the mason and be like 'that was my partner. See, now I'm confirmed.'
What? This is absolutely horrible. Confirmed to be able to nighttalk, maybe, but not alignment-confirmed, and you know it. If they're not confirmed and DS's partner dies and flips town, we don't know a thing about his (DS's) alignment. And if he says they are confirmed, I'm not going to believe it until his partner backs his claim up. (That is the primary advantage of masons, yes? To be able to say, "yes, this guy's being truthful as far as his role goes"?)
Phlight wrote:Alternatively, if he dies and flips mason, the partner has the option of immediately claiming or waiting 'til he's close to lynch or at lylo.
Same problem.
Even if he claims his partner's name, there's still no guarantee they're masons until one dies.
If his partner backs him up on it, either both of them are masons/neighbors/what-have-you or both of them are scum. (Absurd play by both parties excepted, of course.)
We don't gain anything from the name, and we lose power-roles.
...were you even reading 111? If scum go for the masons, they're giving whatever other PR(s) we have two nights to be useful. (And I'm sure we have at least one that's not the masons.)
I have trouble seeing how this impressive reading comprehension fail could come from experienced town.
HoS: Phlight
- my vote's staying on DS until he fullclaims, and it might stay there after the claim as well (it depends what he says). If I unvote DS, you're next.
Discretion is the better part of valor.
If I helped lynch you, you deserved it.
Retired from playing for the foreseeable future.