mykonian wrote:StrangerCoug wrote:mykonian wrote:And why are you so eager to defend him? This feels a lot like buddying to me.
FoS SC
You know why I'm so eager to defend malpascp? I'm his day mason. Your rolefishing has disabled you from being saved. Goodbye.
SC... you don't claim the only powerrole we have this easily.
I didn't want to claim. Yes, scum won this battle. However, they will lose the war if we can help it.
mykonian wrote:Further, if I see someone defend another without reason, that could just be as easily buddying. I have never asked for a claim of whatever, so I was not rolefishing here, but trying to find scum.
News flash #1: There are some situations where it's fine for town to defend town. Cop with an innocent is the situation that comes to mind most often, but mod-confirmed masons are another situation where buddying is OK. It is dangerous for a two-person Mafia team to buddy to each other.
News flash #2: My scum meta is that I bus or go after a VT more often than I buddy to someone.
mykonian wrote:wolframnhart wrote:Hello all! Happy to help out and replace into a game here.
I have a question(s) from my read through.
SK, Malp claimed he believed you and Myo to be scum, yet you claim Malp to be your day mason. Was this even a serious claim? It would seem odd for your apparent day mason to even remotely link you to being a scum.
You confuse strangercough and Saintkerrigan
And you, mykonian, confuse coughing and cougars.
Anyway, now that I know that wolframnhart is talking to me, malpascp made no such post. malpascp suggested mykonian and SaintKerrigan, not mykonian and me, to be scum together. Yes, I seriously mean that claim. Anybody in this game even thinking about fakeclaiming mason is suicidal.