Legacy of the Ancients Mafia (That's All, Folks!)

[dramonic]

In a bastard game, there is no such thing as a mod error: they are called last minute setup modifications.

[forbiddanlight]

Note the update to first post. Tarhalindur is NOT a player in this game. - Tar

Sure, Tar

Hmm...but I wonder what role could be used that is absolutely not appearing in this game...and how you lynch someone who is not appearing in this mafia. Does anyone have a role to handle this?



Ok, so, let me get this straight...we have two people who want to be lynched D0.

MS 3 was based partially off this set up.

MS 3 had 4 jesters.

Is there any reason we should pander to those asking to be lynched?

[Xylthixlm]

I think it would be best if I were lynched Day 0...

You only have to ask.

unvote, vote MafiaSSK

[Starbuck]

Votes required to lynch:

14

Note the existence of an extra vote hidden somewhere.

...or a mod error . We shall see.

It's not a mod error. I'm listed twice because I'm a double voter. Go back and look at all the vote counts.

[forbiddanlight]

It's not a mod error. I'm listed twice because I'm a double voter. Go back and look at all the vote counts. Very Happy

/me takes notes

I will remember this when if/when I use doublevoters in the future.

[xRECKONERx]

Shut up, or say something useful.

That. Is. So. Helpful.

lol at someone not knowing what their own sig means

In any case, let's GTFO SSK. Especially when their could be a Jester.

[Xylthixlm]

The correct response to a potential jester is to lynch them.

[forbiddanlight]

The correct response to a potential jester is to lynch them.

What if you are aware of the potential for vig kills in this game?

[Maemuki]

Meh, I don't consider Mufasa as much of a metahell as Zwet.
Don't know bout Maemuki.

?

In any case, let's GTFO SSK. Especially when their could be a Jester.

? [2]

Well, there are three possibilities for SSK's attitude.

a. He's a jester.
b. He has a trigger-on-death ability. (could happen.)
c. His ability helps more scum than town

Which one is it, SSK?

Vote: MafiaSSK

How should lurkers be dealt with then?

Forceful replacement?

[Xylthixlm]

The correct response to a potential jester is to lynch them.

What if you are aware of the potential for vig kills in this game?

The correct response to a potential jester is to lynch them.

[Xylthixlm]

Also, the argument "we shouldn't lynch X, we should have a vig kill them instead" is... wacky.

"We shouldn't lynch a jester, we should have a vig kill them instead."
"We shouldn't lynch a lurker, we should have a vig kill them instead."
"We shouldn't lynch a scum, we should have a vig kill them instead."

What, exactly, is the difference that makes people think the first two are good ideas despite the last one being self-evidently stupid? I haven't figured this out yet. Someone enlighten me? Because to

my

logic, anything that would be worth vigging for is also worth lynching for.

[Starbuck]

I'm kind of wary of those easily jumping on the SSK bandwagon.

[xRECKONERx]

Also, the argument "we shouldn't lynch X, we should have a vig kill them instead" is... wacky.

"We shouldn't lynch a jester, we should have a vig kill them instead."
"We shouldn't lynch a lurker, we should have a vig kill them instead."
"We shouldn't lynch a scum, we should have a vig kill them instead."

What, exactly, is the difference that makes people think the first two are good ideas despite the last one being self-evidently stupid? I haven't figured this out yet. Someone enlighten me? Because to

my

logic, anything that would be worth vigging for is also worth lynching for.

Umm... shouldn't the first one be evident? Jester wins if they are lynched. Ergo, vig kills them. How is that hard to understand.

[Slicey]

I think it would be best if I were lynched Day 0...

Sounds good to me.

Unvote, Vote: SSK

Reck is scum BTW. Starbuck most likely is too.

[Xylthixlm]

It doesn't hurt the town to let the jester win.

[Xylthixlm]

Also consider the possibility SSK is telling the truth and lynching him really is best, btw.

[Xylthixlm]

Totally buying reck-scum.

[DragonsofSummer]

Yes I mean lurkers. And I am against the argument because we as a town gain very little, if any, information from lynching a lurker imo.

How should lurkers be dealt with then?

Replacement. There is nothing to be gained by lynching someone who is saying nothing and interacting with no one.

[Slicey]

Totally buying reck-scum.

And Starbuck? This would be a good game for an anti-town double voter.

[Starbuck]

Totally buying reck-scum.

And Starbuck? This would be a good game for an anti-town double voter.

I wish I didn't have an ability that's normally on the scummy end of the spectrum, but not much I can do about it.

[DragonsofSummer]

I think it would be best if I were lynched Day 0...

Sounds good to me.

Unvote, Vote: SSK

Reck is scum BTW. Starbuck most likely is too.

unvote, vote Slicey

Nice hop onto a wagon thats gaining momentum for no reason whatsoever, and calling out two people who pointed that out. If we lynch SSK now with no other interactions between players the amount of information gained from such lynch will be minimal. We are on page 5 of a 25 player game, and I don't like the speed of this wagon (yes I realize he is nowhere near lynch yet, but it still bothers me that ssk said jump and a ton of players basically said how high?) The reason I vote slicey rather than anyone else is because he jumps on the wagon and then to look innocuous throws suspicion at two people with no reasoning behind it.

FoS:Xylthixlm

for agreeing and trying to create more suspicion with no reasoning.

[Xylthixlm]

DoS is scum.

[DragonsofSummer]

Somehow... I knew that was going to be your first statement when you saw my post...

[DragonsofSummer]

EBWOP: If you have legitimate reasons for why you think Reck is scum I would love to hear them, but you have given none, and not voted for him, simply because SSK said he wanted to be lynched. That is very scummy.

[Xylthixlm]

Nothing takes priority over someone who asks to be lynched. I'll happily lynch you tomorrow.