Open 171- Carbon 14, Part 2!! Over!!

[Scigatt]

Khamisa is at L-3 <<

Your overly-paranoid behaviour towards wagons (which your latest posts didn't help at all), along with your ignoring the fact that some conversation HAS happened. At to that that even your random votes is hindering your towniness (you tell me screw you cause I was on you first game and you were scum, what makes you think I can't catch scum again? Kill me quick much?) and we have a nice scum meltingpot

Ok!!!!

Vote: Khamisa

You won't escape this time!

I find it strange that you could miss that, seeing as it was the first official vote in the game and it was in the first vote count.

[Alduskkel]

Unvote, Vote: dramonic

. Please try to count properly. Khamisa is at L-2 (Snow_Bunny, Cass). Coupled with your nonsense about Scigatt being so blatant as to do that during the RVS, and you've got a case that's being blown out of proportion. I think you're just trying to get a mislynch on a somewhat overly cautious Townie (not saying he's vanilla btw).

[Alduskkel]

And

FoS: Khamisa

. Posts 63 and 72.

[dramonic]

Hmm, somehow, I was under the impression it was 5 to lynch.

My mistake on that one.

[Alduskkel]

How did you get to thinking that?

[dramonic]

I'm still trying to figure that out ^_^;

[Alduskkel]

Don't you have anything else to say in your defense?

[Cass]

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

[Snow_Bunny]

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

Putting some at L-2 in the first 3 pages of the game can be a big deal. Yeah, it can be expected with the random votes, but still, it's really unlikely that all of those votes are really

random

.

[Scigatt]

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

Here's me putting dramonic at L-2.

Vote:dramonic

(Remember that Khamisa was already at L-2, and my potential post 72 would have put her at L-1)

[Scigatt]

EBWOP:
*potential vote on post 72

[semioldguy]

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

Putting some at L-2 in the first 3 pages of the game can be a big deal. Yeah, it can be expected with the random votes, but still, it's really unlikely that all of those votes are really

random

.

Since L-2 is only two votes, I don't think it's a very big deal. I'd be surprised if it took very long before a player was at L-2. This game is much smaller than most games, so I don't think the ame mindset regarding an L-2 wagon applies.

L-1 wagons are probably more dangerous though, especially early on, as a potential quick mislynch would be extremely helpful to scum, even if one of them is potentially outted with the lynch. As town we only have one mislynch before we lose.

[Snow_Bunny]

Right! We're only 7 players. Talking about small games...

[Scigatt]

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

Putting some at L-2 in the first 3 pages of the game can be a big deal. Yeah, it can be expected with the random votes, but still, it's really unlikely that all of those votes are really

random

.

Since L-2 is only two votes, I don't think it's a very big deal. I'd be surprised if it took very long before a player was at L-2. This game is much smaller than most games, so I don't think the ame mindset regarding an L-2 wagon applies.

L-1 wagons are probably more dangerous though, especially early on, as a potential quick mislynch would be extremely helpful to scum, even if one of them is potentially outted with the lynch. As town we only have one mislynch before we lose.

Cass, can you tell me how this conversation pertains to finding scum?

[dramonic]

How about you ask the poster instead of Cass?

noted.

[Khamisa]

Scigatt/semiold: I guess you're right. It seemed like Aldusskel criticised you because you actually had voted...so I thought it was either you did vote or you didn't vote.

[Scigatt]

How about you ask the poster instead of Cass?

noted.

Because Cass started that conversation, and despite that I thought it wold be good to show part of the conversation in a condensed form.

Is that the only complaint you have?

[dramonic]

it's an extra complain

[Scigatt]

Oh, I'll be away for the computer for most of Friday. In case there's a lynch and I don't make it to D2, I'd just like to say that if we lynch scum or get a guilty investigation result, the 'useless' investigator should claim, so we can narrow down lynch options.

[dramonic]

possible V/LA until the 27th

[semioldguy]

Oh, I'll be away for the computer for most of Friday. In case there's a lynch and I don't make it to D2, I'd just like to say that if we lynch scum or get a guilty investigation result, the 'useless' investigator should claim, so we can narrow down lynch options.

The investigators should claim anyway, even if we lynch an innocent, since we will be in lylo tomorrow in that case.

[Alduskkel]

Mod: What is the vote count?

[semioldguy]

A modification to the above would be that in mass claim time an investigator claims merely that he is an investigator and does not reveal which type of investigator he is unless we have three investigator claims. This way scum wouldn't know which of the claimed investigators to kill on night two and have a 50/50 chance of killing the wrong one.

[Scigatt]

Well, I'm back. (Went to see a concert yesterday. Yay Pearl Jam!:mrgreen:)

A modification to the above would be that in mass claim time an investigator claims merely that he is an investigator and does not reveal which type of investigator he is unless we have three investigator claims. This way scum wouldn't know which of the claimed investigators to kill on night two and have a 50/50 chance of killing the wrong one.

I like that plan if we neither lynch mafia or get a guilty investigation. Otherwise, I prefer my plan.

[Cass]

Oh, I'll be away for the computer for most of Friday. In case there's a lynch and I don't make it to D2, I'd just like to say that if we lynch scum or get a guilty investigation result, the 'useless' investigator should claim, so we can narrow down lynch options.

The investigators should claim anyway, even if we lynch an innocent, since we will be in lylo tomorrow in that case.

All this of course only if we manage to keep both investigators. For a case where this happened (and an amusing read), check out the previous Carbon 14 game. Also, don't be like the confirmed innocent in that one who lost the game all by himself...

Right. People have to stop being overdramatic about putting someone at L-2. It is not a big deal, period. L-1 deserves scrutiny, and people not paying attention to votecounts certainly does too. But if everyone gets too scared to vote because more than one vote on a person is ohso evil, the game stagnates like whoa.

Putting some at L-2 in the first 3 pages of the game can be a big deal. Yeah, it can be expected with the random votes, but still, it's really unlikely that all of those votes are really

random

.

How about your vote? Is it still random, and don't you think you should remove it - now it keeps Khamisa on L-2? Also, could you post something more than just fluff, please?