Open 171- Carbon 14, Part 2!! Over!!

[Scigatt]

Why only an FoS instead of a vote?

I don't like throwing around serious votes too often, okay.

[Scigatt]

EBWOP:One more thing

FoS:Alduskkel

Again for being a little too eager on the wagon.

[dramonic]

If my calculations are correct, next time I vote you're supposed to vote like me right after Scigatt

[afatchic]

Vote Count #1!!

Scigatt-(2)- dramonic, Alduskkel
Snow_Bunny-(1)- semioldguy
Khamisa-(1)- Snow_Bunny

Not voting-(3)-Khamisa, Cass, Scigatt

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch!

Deadline is October 1st @ 2:30 p.m.

Oh, yeah if you wanna quote your PM from last game that's fine. Thank you for asking!

[Scigatt]

If my calculations are correct, next time I vote you're supposed to vote like me right after Scigatt

That doesn't make any sense...

[semioldguy]

@dramonic
Who are you talking about?

[dramonic]

working my way up the player list XD

M first vote got followed by you, right above me in the list.
My second vote got followed by the Alkuskell, right above you.
So I suppose my third will be followed by Scigatt, right above him



Huzzah for randomness.

[Cass]

I have some problems getting into this game. I think I might go read some old small opens to see how they managed to pick a first lynch.

[Snow_Bunny]

I'm too having problems to get into this game. The game isn't as appealing as it was the first time.

[semioldguy]

I don't know what's wrong with just voting/lynching the players that come across as most scummy. How else would people pick a first lynch?

I don't think that Scigatt's reaction to the two quick votes is indicative of his being scum. He didn't seem nearly as concerned about the voting in the previous game when he was scum (until his partner was getting several votes). Even with such little amount to go on from last time, his play here feels different than it did last game. As such, I don't think he is likely scum in this situation, unless he is partners with Snow_Bunny.

[Khamisa]

I do find Scigatt's unvote a little jumpy, mostly because he wasn't even voting SB.

also, sog's lie about not random voting doesn't really strike me as scummy.

[Scigatt]

I do find Scigatt's unvote a little jumpy, mostly because he wasn't even voting SB.

also, sog's lie about not random voting doesn't really strike me as scummy.

I told you, that unvote wasn't related to the FoS, it was to get rid of the random vote I had.

[semioldguy]

also, sog's lie about not random voting doesn't really strike me as scummy.

I didn't lie about that.

[Cass]

Hm, in the other games I read it's mostly just people fighting about very minor things, throwing votes around until someone gets tired of it and hammers (usually a townie...). So...

Vote: Khamisa

I disagree that Scigatt seems jumpy, and your last post seems like an attempt to misrepresent both Scigatt and sog.

Also, games move faster if people keep their vote somewhere rather than nowhere.

[Scigatt]

Hm, in the other games I read it's mostly just people fighting about very minor things, throwing votes around until someone gets tired of it and hammers (usually a townie...). So...

Vote: Khamisa

I disagree that Scigatt seems jumpy, and your last post seems like an attempt to misrepresent both Scigatt and sog.

Also, games move faster if people keep their vote somewhere rather than nowhere.

Good catch on the Khamisa-sog, thing. You can count on my support if I don't find something.

Anyway, what was the purpose of your post 56, dramonic? We are trying to get out of random voting and silliness, not extend it. (We do have a deadline, remember?)

[semioldguy]

Good catch on the Khamisa-sog, thing. You can count on my support if I don't find something.

Was there any scum discussion between you two during the pregame phase of the last game?

[dramonic]

It's called humor. Clearly you missed it, no matter. We have some stuff started.

[semioldguy]

Good catch on the Khamisa-sog, thing. You can count on my support if I don't find something.

Was there any scum discussion between you two during the pregame phase of the last game?

Khamisa should feel free to answer this as well.

[Khamisa]

semioldguy: You said you didn't random vote. Ald's meta of you proves you have random voted at least once.

Scigatt's vote removal still seems odd to me.

Khamisa: I don't think so.

[semioldguy]

I said I don't

always

random vote.

[Scigatt]

It's called humor. Clearly you missed it, no matter. We have some stuff started.

Your post 24 was humour. If 56 is humour, then it's a really watered-down, crappy kind.

Also, for s.o.g.: No, we did not get any conversation in.

[dramonic]

My vote is so not changing.

[Scigatt]

EBWOP:You know what, I really don't like that Khamisa was making her case without checking to see what the players actually did.(which, I think, would be the town thing to do, since you wouldn't want to misrepresent someone.)

Major FoS:Khamisa

, seeing as she is already at L-2.

[Scigatt]

My vote is so not changing.

What makes you so sure I'm scum?

[dramonic]

Khamisa is at L-3 <<

Your overly-paranoid behaviour towards wagons (which your latest posts didn't help at all), along with your ignoring the fact that some conversation HAS happened. At to that that even your random votes is hindering your towniness (you tell me screw you cause I was on you first game and you were scum, what makes you think I can't catch scum again? Kill me quick much?) and we have a nice scum meltingpot