Open 167 - Pie E7 Game over, quick like. before 844

[Toro]

Original Roll String: 1d7 (STATIC)

1 7-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

Would anyone up for a quicklynch?

Right here. Netlava.

FoS: Netlava

.

[Netlava]

I agree. Toro's vote seemed like an intentional misinterpretation of my points. I'm waiting to see how he arrived at that conclusion, though.

[Toro]

Unvote, Vote Toro

. Netlava's play just seems like he is trying to get conversation started to me. However, Toro's play really isn't sitting well with me at the moment.

By the way guys, my Birthday is this weekend, and i have plans for basically the whole weekend. So count me V/La until tuesday.

Okay 'splain why my play isn't sitting well with you.

[Netlava]

It was a joke intended to elicit a reaction. I made it clear afterwards that I don't actually support a quicklynch.

[Netlava]

Unvote, vote: Toro

[Toro]

Quicklynch, Random Lynch, to me it sounds as if you just want to play russian roulette with your 'fellow' townmembers.

[Zachrulez]

It was a joke intended to elicit a reaction. I made it clear afterwards that I don't actually support a quicklynch.

Well you certainly did get a reaction from me, and you did make it clear.

That, along with your earlier game behavior leading me to believe you actually wanted a quick lynch was the reason for my vote. Now that it has been cleared up

unvote:

I was also curious to see if I could get any kind of reaction from you on my vote and see if you could figure out the reasoning for it.

[Netlava]

You don't think there's a difference between quicklynch or random lynch?

A random lynch is not an inferior strategy to a non-random lynch. Townie reads aren't perfect, either.

A quicklynch is an inferior strategy.

[Toro]

Random/Quick Lynch: A lynch w/o much info. You want to off a power role go ahead, be my guest.

[Netlava]

The assumption is that power roles claim like they're supposed to if they meet an unlucky roll.

[Toro]

Then that just gives scum the chance to pick 'em off at night, dude, think.

[Netlava]

I could run through all the scenarios and show that it ends up being balanced in the end.

[Netlava]

Btw, do you think that random lynches & quicklynches are equivalently inferior?

[Toro]

umm...yeah.

[Netlava]

I think a random lynch ends up with more info in the end.

[Zachrulez]

I think a random lynch ends up with more info in the end.

See, now that's the confusing part for me.

I don't see how randomly lynching gives you more information when less discussion results from it.

[Toro]

I think a random lynch ends up with more info in the end.

See, now that's the confusing part for me.

I don't see how randomly lynching gives you more information when less discussion results from it.

/nod

[afatchic]

So you will take quicklynches as a back-up option yet you wish for a short day...

I think you might soon get your wish...

Unvote

Vote: Netlava

Original Roll String: 1d7 (STATIC)

1 7-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

Would anyone up for a quicklynch?

Right here. Netlava.

FoS: Netlava

.

Did you really just FOS the guy you are ALREADY voting. Wouldn't a vote get the point across that you are suspicious of him?

[Toro]

Yeah, I'm just pointing out flaws in his argument.

[Netlava]

I can see where you're coming from, Toro, if you think quicklynches and random lynches are pretty much the same.

What I can't see is how you took this quote:

So you will take quicklynches as a back-up option yet you wish for a short day...

Swapped random lynches for quicklynches (when I clearly differentiated the two).

Plus if I were to take quicklynches as a back-up option, wishing for a short day would be consistent with the above premise.

[Toro]

I switch quicklynches and random lynches because in the way I understand, it's the SAME FLIPPING THING. Lynch w/o info = quicklynch. Lynch w/o info = randomlynch/

[Netlava]

See, now that's the confusing part for me.

I don't see how randomly lynching gives you more information when less discussion results from it.

Eh, my assumption was that random lynches result in discussion in the end, whereas a quicklynch doesn't leave time for such.

Statistically speaking, on D1 town lynches correctly much less often than randomly lynching would. I remember reading this somewhere.

[Netlava]

I switch quicklynches and random lynches because in the way I understand, it's the SAME FLIPPING THING. Lynch w/o info = quicklynch. Lynch w/o info = randomlynch/

That's the way you understand it. That's not the way I understand it. I just thought you would think that my previous posts indicated such a differentiation when I said that I didn't want a quicklynch.

But anyways,

unvote

. I'll have to think about it later.

[Zachrulez]

See, now that's the confusing part for me.

I don't see how randomly lynching gives you more information when less discussion results from it.

Eh, my assumption was that random lynches result in discussion in the end, whereas a quicklynch doesn't leave time for such.

Statistically speaking, on D1 town lynches correctly much less often than randomly lynching would. I remember reading this somewhere.

Now that's an interesting claim.

I went and dredged up some statistics on an old newbie game I played.

[Netlava]

Well, either way random lynching is a back-up option in case discussion never gets started.

I'd like to think I have some reads now. Who knows.