/in-vitational 3: Brass & Shrapnel. Over. before 831

[MacavityLock]

Yes, I'm talking to Budja.
Yes, I disagree with his case.
Yes, I still think his lack of camaraderie was a bit weird.
No, I don't really think it's a serious issue.
No, I don't intend to lynch CKD at this time.
No, I haven't found a better place for my vote yet. I'll move it when I do.

Also, since when is lynch-2 a problem?

My point was more that you're leaving CKD as the big bandwagon. Interesting cognitive dissonance that I'm seeing here, but I'm not sure what to make of it.

[Porochaz]

Ok, am disliking currently Budja and Kublai Khan. Budja as I dislike his case on ckd, and Kublai Khan because he seems to be getting overly emotional over attacks on him. CKD has also hit my scumdar early on but not enough to even consider at this early stage.

vote Kublai Khan

wins it over budja.

[curiouskarmadog]

Ok, am disliking currently Budja and Kublai Khan. Budja as I dislike his case on ckd, and Kublai Khan because he seems to be getting overly emotional over attacks on him. CKD has also hit my scumdar early on but not enough to even consider at this early stage.

vote Kublai Khan

wins it over budja.

what did I do to hit your scumdar?

What about Bud's case on me do you not like?

Are you saying emotional = Scummy?

There is nothing about this post that I like.

[Kublai Khan]

Ok, am disliking currently Budja and Kublai Khan. Budja as I dislike his case on ckd, and Kublai Khan because he seems to be getting overly emotional over attacks on him. CKD has also hit my scumdar early on but not enough to even consider at this early stage.

vote Kublai Khan

wins it over budja.

Hmm.. What do you think of Quagmire?

[Budja]

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 55#1832655

[molestargazer]

Prod received. Will work on a post this afternoon.

[Porochaz]

Ok, am disliking currently Budja and Kublai Khan. Budja as I dislike his case on ckd, and Kublai Khan because he seems to be getting overly emotional over attacks on him. CKD has also hit my scumdar early on but not enough to even consider at this early stage.

vote Kublai Khan

wins it over budja.

what did I do to hit your scumdar?

You didnt, I meant CDB, sorry

What about Bud's case on me do you not like?

basically what you said in post 90, I dont have anything to add, Im bandwagoning currently

Are you saying emotional = Scummy?

over emotional, especially in this stage of the game

There is nothing about this post that I like.

[Kublai Khan]

over emotional, especially in this stage of the game

Out of curiousity.. Given that we've never played together before, what is your baseline threshold for what's considered emotional vs non-emotional? Is it in comparison to yourself, an "average" scummer, or have to done meta research on me before beginning this game?

Also, why did you ignore my question about Quagmire?

[Porochaz]

Didnt mean to, I have no opinion of Quagmire yet.

My baseline for players I havent played before is compared to the majority of the players Ive played with players Ive played with before. (obviously Zoneace/charter withstanding) If you are like said players then it wont take me long to work that out.

[Vi]

Vote Count

(3) curiouskarmadog- ChannelDelibird, hascow, Budja

(3) Kublai Khan- MacavityLock, molestargazer, Porochaz
(1) Quagmire- Kublai Khan
(1) Budja- curiouskarmadog
(1) hascow- Quagmire

[size=0]Bud 0 PROD1 3 | CDb 1 PROD1 7 | ckd 0 | cow 3 PROD1 0 | KK 0 | Mac 0 | msg 0 PROD1 1 | Poro 0 PROD1 7 PROD2 2 | Quag 2[/size]
5 to lynch

Deadline is September 3rd 6 PM EST.

hasdgfas is being prodded...

[hasdgfas]

sorry, completely forgot to post V/LA.

Porochaz: Do you have no opinion on everyone who you haven't already mentioned, or did you just not find them special enough to mention?

[Porochaz]

Not special enough. I have minor opinions of a few other players but nothing worth mentioning or getting bogged down with.

[molestargazer]

Quick summary of my thoughts / catch-up. Apologies for my absence. I figure the best way to get myself back interested in this game is to make a few calls.
Despite calling it out earlier, I'm not so sure that Budja's RVS-return comment was scummy at all.

I'm quite happy with my vote on KK for now. I don't like how in Post 73 he states that a vote must be serious if correcting the mod on it. I know that I, personally, would want to make sure that ANY vote I placed, be it serious or not, be counted.
He also hasn't responded to my question regarding his criticism of me in said post in my Post 78.
Until that response occurs, I'll keep my vote here. Up to said post, I'm not seeing anything that would trump this.
I don't like his aggressive-seeming response to Mac in P79, whether it's scummy or not is debatable.

Interesting how Quagmire jumps to a vote after being called out for being wishy-washy by KK. I'm sure his reasons for the vote are OK, but the timing isn't.

@CKD, voting for someone for pushing out of the random stage could have an effect of dampening communication and is generally bad reasoning. I dislike that.

This seems silly. Putting back to RVS would reduce discussion, but voting someone for trying to do that

also

dampens discussion? How does that work?

[curiouskarmadog]

it doesnt...

[curiouskarmadog]

I am going to be traveling (my work is sending me on detail for the month away from home)...probably no posting then....however, I will be bored out of my mind for the next month...so frequency of posting will increase after this weekend..

posting this is all games.//

[Quagmire]

Interesting how Quagmire jumps to a vote after being called out for being wishy-washy by KK. I'm sure his reasons for the vote are OK, but the timing isn't.

KK called me wishy-washy?

[Vi]

Vote Count

(3) curiouskarmadog- ChannelDelibird, hascow, Budja

(3) Kublai Khan- MacavityLock, molestargazer, Porochaz
(1) Quagmire- Kublai Khan
(1) Budja- curiouskarmadog
(1) hascow- Quagmire

[size=0]Bud 1 PROD1 4 | CDb 2 PROD1 8 | ckd 0 | cow 0 PROD1 1 | KK 1 | Mac 1 | msg 0 PROD1 2 | Poro 0 PROD1 8 PROD2 3 | Quag 0[/size]
5 to lynch

Deadline is September 3rd 6 PM EST.

In a surprise move, nobody is being prodded today.

[molestargazer]

Interesting how Quagmire jumps to a vote after being called out for being wishy-washy by KK. I'm sure his reasons for the vote are OK, but the timing isn't.

KK called me wishy-washy?

That's how I interpreted it, yes.
See Your post here. He accused you of "playing both sides", refusing to take a stand - being wishy-washy. And that evidently prompted you to make a vote.

[curiouskarmadog]

CDB, why still the random vote?

[Quagmire]

V/LA until Monday.

[Vi]

Vote Count

(3) curiouskarmadog- ChannelDelibird, hascow, Budja

(3) Kublai Khan- MacavityLock, molestargazer, Porochaz
(1) Quagmire- Kublai Khan
(1) Budja- curiouskarmadog
(1) hascow- Quagmire

[size=0]Bud 2 PROD1 5 | CDb 3 PROD1 9 PROD2 0 | ckd 1 | cow 1 PROD1 2 | KK 2 | Mac 2 | msg 1 PROD1 3 | Poro 1 PROD1 9 PROD2 4 | Quag 1[/size]
5 to lynch

Deadline is September 3rd 6 PM EST.

ChannelDelibird is being prodded.

[ChannelDelibird]

Ack, sorry about the prod (again). Sorta LA notice: I'm busy all day playing cricket in Gouda. I'll be able to post tomorrow. Intending to increase activity levels after this.

[Budja]

(back)

This seems silly. Putting back to RVS would reduce discussion, but

voting someone for trying to do that also dampens discussion?

How does that work?

I don't understand what you are saying here.

[molestargazer]

Just going to take a reread to clarify Budja's question and my point.

- CKD votes hascow here, which I believe is the vote later discussed. It seems relatively serious to me.
- Budja first attacks CKD for 'attempting to return to RVS' here.

Now back to the quote:

@CKD, voting for someone for pushing out of the random stage could have an effect of dampening communication and is generally bad reasoning. I dislike that.

Which seems to suggest that Budja now things that CKD voted for hascow for trying to push out of the random stage, and Budja is voting CKD for this reason.

How my post should have gone:

This seems silly. Putting back to RVS would reduce discussion, but voting someone for

making a serious vote

also dampens discussion? How does that work?

[Porochaz]

Ack, sorry about the prod (again). Sorta LA notice: I'm busy all day playing cricket in Gouda. I'll be able to post tomorrow. Intending to increase activity levels after this.

Your playing cricket in cheese...