Mini 828 - ProzacMod 3 - Lost Mafia - Over

[VP Baltar]

Which votes were serious?

And yes, asking whether a wagon is serious or not is taking a pretty active role in derailing it, whethere you used the word "stop" or not.

Let me put this a different way then, what is your motivation in asking if the wagon was serious or not?

[Porochaz]

LockeLamora - 3 - Drench, VP Baltar, Jebus
Drench - 1 - curiouskarmadog
Jebus - 1 - canadianbovine
xReckonerx - 1 - JasonT1981
canadianbovine - 1 - xRecknonerx
ChanelDelibird - 1 - Emptyger

Not Voting:
Juls, ZONEACE, Locke Lamora, ChanelDelibird

[jasonT1981]

Let me put this a different way then, what is your motivation in asking if the wagon was serious or not?

To be honest, I find it hard to believe any such wagon would be serious at this stage of the game.

[Jebus]

Reckoner:

I also don't like the pushing for a Lockewagon. RV on Locke, okay. Pushing for a wagon on the basis of obvious scum, no.

Who has been “pushing for a wagon on the basis of obvious scum”, rather than RVing?

Umm...

Come on, guys, Locke is obviously scum. Get on this wagon GOGOGO!

Come on, guys, Jebus was obviously sarcastic, Reckoner wagon gogogo!

unvote, Vote: Reckoner

Also,

Seriously though:

Come on, guys, Locke is obviously scum. Get on this wagon GOGOGO!

Are we being srs here?

Was my sarcasm not that obvious? How could Locke have any scummy so far if s/he hasn't even posted in this topic once (outside of a "/confirm")?

FoS: Drench

[ChannelDelibird]

Just got back from V/LA,

/conform

and reading up shortly.

[VP Baltar]

To be honest, I find it hard to believe any such wagon would be serious at this stage of the game.

Are you a Drench alt?

[canadianbovine]

Reckoner:
…That’s your interpretation of Jebus’s post? Don’t you think that’s a little overliteral for the first 12 hours into the game? Why don’t you think that he was RVing there?

---

CB:
Are you asking me something?

no i was just quoting the koreans.

[xRECKONERx]

Jebus, is that a serious vote?

[canadianbovine]

Reckoner:
…That’s your interpretation of Jebus’s post? Don’t you think that’s a little overliteral for the first 12 hours into the game? Why don’t you think that he was RVing there?

---

CB:
Are you asking me something?

no i was just quoting the koreans.

i said "do you think she knows that he loves her" for those who dont know how to translate things online.

[jasonT1981]

To be honest, I find it hard to believe any such wagon would be serious at this stage of the game.

Are you a Drench alt?

Not really, I was just making the point.... No bandwagon at the RVS is serious, and you are not going to get a lynch out of it... however it can be good information to go on as in who hopped on and off etc.

[canadianbovine]

To be honest, I find it hard to believe any such wagon would be serious at this stage of the game.

Are you a Drench alt?

Not really, I was just making the point.... No bandwagon at the RVS is serious, and you are not going to get a lynch out of it... however it can be good information to go on as in who hopped on and off etc.

are we even in the RVS anymore?

[curiouskarmadog]

Which votes were serious?

mine is.

[VP Baltar]

ATTN ALL: Post 50 is directed at Drench. kthxbye.

[ZONEACE]

vote vp baltar

for being the last person to post before i posted.

[ChannelDelibird]

Vote: Zoneace

for posting as if the last two pages of discussion didn't happen.

I see signs of theoretical differences of opinion in the last couple of pages, not any real suggestion of scummy intent from any party.

[Jebus]

Jebus, is that a serious vote?

Yes.

[Drench]

Which votes were serious?

And yes, asking whether a wagon is serious or not is taking a pretty active role in derailing it, whethere you used the word "stop" or not.

Let me put this a different way then, what is your motivation in asking if the wagon was serious or not?

a) CKD's was at the time I made that post, and CDB's looks serious too. Jebus says his vote is srs too, so it seems we are out of RVS.

b) If the wagon was serious, then obviously there would be some following up needed to be done, such as the intent of the wagon.

If it wasn't, then seeming as we are out of RVS as above, it should stop advancing.

FoS: Zoneace

. Pretending the first two pages aren't there isn't exactly what we should be doing. Do you have any opinions as of yet of the first two pages?

[ZONEACE]

We're two pages into a game with 12 people, lets all stop acting like we're out of the random voting stage.

[EmpTyger]

Unvote: ChannelDelibird

Also, note that I’m going to be rather busy this week.

---

Reckoner:
That’s not what I meant. I’m asking why you thought that Jebus’s declaration (on p2, within the first 24 hours of game start) that a player (who hasn’t yet posted) was “obviously scum” was significantly more serious than RVing.

Which I still want to know.

---

VP:
What do you think about Reckoner’s reaction to the LL bandwagon?

---

CD:

Vote: Zoneace

for posting as if the last two pages of discussion didn't happen.

I see signs of theoretical differences of opinion in the last couple of pages, not any real suggestion of scummy intent from any party.

If there hasn't yet been any "suggestion of scummy intent", what's wrong with still randomvoting?

[ChannelDelibird]

CD:

Vote: Zoneace

for posting as if the last two pages of discussion didn't happen.

I see signs of theoretical differences of opinion in the last couple of pages, not any real suggestion of scummy intent from any party.

If there hasn't yet been any "suggestion of scummy intent", what's wrong with still randomvoting?

I don't have a problem with Zoneace random voting at this stage, but I don't think that's mutually exclusive to giving his opinion on what's been said so far, even if it's him saying he doesn't think any of it is important. The lack of comment on the discussion so far suggests to me that he's happy to let it continue while he ignores it and stays off the radar.

[ZONEACE]

CD:

Vote: Zoneace

for posting as if the last two pages of discussion didn't happen.

I see signs of theoretical differences of opinion in the last couple of pages, not any real suggestion of scummy intent from any party.

If there hasn't yet been any "suggestion of scummy intent", what's wrong with still randomvoting?

I don't have a problem with Zoneace random voting at this stage, but I don't think that's mutually exclusive to giving his opinion on what's been said so far, even if it's him saying he doesn't think any of it is important. The lack of comment on the discussion so far suggests to me that he's happy to let it continue while he ignores it and stays off the radar.

[ChannelDelibird]

Also, getting people to put their opinions on record as often as possible = a good thing.

Hi, ZONEACE.

[ZONEACE]

I just think its silly that you think its scummy for me not commenting on the fact that NOT A FUCKING THING HAS HAPPENED SO FAR.

[ChannelDelibird]

I think it's somewhat scummy for you to act like it's still page 1 on page 3, yes. Even if you're saying NOT A FUCKING THING HAS HAPPENED SO FAR, which is a reasonable comment, then that's something, but ignoring it competely? No.

[Locke Lamora]

I missed my own wagon! Sorry for the brief absence, everyone.

Looks like everything was pretty jokey in the people who jumped on my wagon, I don't see how anyone could have taken it seriously when all I'd done is confirm. I think ZONEACE is scummier for flat-out ignoring what has happened so far, though. We're not far in, I agree, but saying that nothing has happened when serious votes have already started to be placed indicates a desire to perpetuate the RVS.

Vote: ZONEACE