@Regfan,
905 – I've read this but I have nothing to comment. I responded most of these things in my previous post (to the "other halves" for your dialogues). As for scumreading me: frankly, so far Hephaeustus has been the only one who has posted anything else but that "pushing the ZZZX" wagon bullshyt. Strange...
_____
In post 907, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 877, Aneninen wrote:@Flubber,
855 – why do you think the Vigilante is the most useful role for both factions? I disagree with other points too
(...)
Because it's a free kill? I don't know. It's a gut thing. Setup theory is one of my weakest points. Maybe that's why I can in no way see role cop as pro town.
I must admit that I have no rational reasons but I don't like this answer.
_____
Hephaestus-mix.
909 – being and claiming a Vig is pretty much null, I suppose (assuming that the claim is real, of course).
910 – true. That would have been an unnecessary risk. Plus, Regfan's posts are not scummy at all. Plus, he had to claim VT. There is a thin chance that the latter one happened because of this logic: "I'm early in the draft with a scum PR. If I don't die early people might start think that I'm scum just because I'm alive sooooo, let's claim VT somehow..." – BUT, if Regfan had done this how the f-ck would he know where the Rolecop/Backup pair is to be searched?
911 – the first part is a null. As for the next part: I've just started pushing a wagon against Uctriton. And – even if it collapsed later – I had had a case against Elmo on Day1, without getting too much support for that.
912 – lol, I haven't noticed that. I have been thinking about it and I've found a possible explanation. This game started with a personal fight which generated unneccessary anger, in my opinion. Perhaps I wanted to "fix the things up" somehow...?
913 – and this vote is a WTF
My reads now: still lean scum; some of the posts were okay and/or even townish but that naked vote... ugh. I'd be happier with a Flubber or Uctriton lynch.
_____
In post 916, uctriton00 wrote:
I wasn't here for Day 1, the ship has sailed.
1
I can use the fact that he flipped town as evidence that he should not have been lynched but that's not going to mean much.
2
(1) How does that sentence make sense right now?
(2) Exactly, that doesn't mean much. Day1 mislynches are common and at least we
had
something in our hands. I've already posted about it many times.
In post 917, uctriton00 wrote:(post has been edited by me)
...
Second is Regfan you also were a driving force of getting ZZZX lynched for claiming role cop. I'm still in the mind that Role Cop can be a very good pro-town role, and I think it was fished out, with very poor reasoning.
1
With both you and Aninem pointing at heph, I do feel like a possible bus is occurring. I know that Aninem is saying that I am a heph partner
2, which seems like an intentional setup, problem is that the town is winning (we survived one NK) so if that's how scum "want to do it", i.e. trade heph for me, scum is playing a losing game.
2
(1) I strongly disagree. Firstly, how the f-ck would be a Rolecop THAT useful? Even if they target scum some rules are absolutely NOT alignment-tells (eg. a Jailkeeper)
(2) And that logic is a WIFOM, in my opinion. "What if the scums are just making an opportunistic wagon?" – that may be true for almost every wagon...
??? In that post-context I simply don't get this post at all.
______
By the way, I can explain my post
353 about Gameplay right now.
