MoS-Faire 3.0 Invitational: GAME OVER

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #875 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:28 am

No one died Night 6

It is now Day 7. With 4 alive, it takes 3 to lynch!

Deadline: (expired on 2014-10-09 16:00:00)

Iecerint · Post Post #876 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:00 pm

Scum, you are a poor sport.

I watched tn. For some reason I was confused and thought I was a tracker. Obvs no result. ^^;

Iecerint · Post Post #877 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:07 pm

So guys, uhh, I had forgotten about this, but tn is actually confirmed town. Katsuki claimed masons with him in the private thread. So there's that.

Katsuki fakeclaims as town all the time, so need to confirm that tn claimed masons. Not sure whether he did or not. Doesn't sound familiar; I had thought it was neighborly.

That leaves BB/Rach as scum/myally, presuming that my ally exists.

Have they even claimed yet? They should probably do that now, since the last scum presumably no-killed.

Iecerint · Post Post #878 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:08 pm

In post 840, tn5421 wrote:My group was basically masons but not.

Meh good enough. This is Katsuki's fault if Katsuki was doing his standard fakeclaim dumbness.

RachMarie · Post Post #879 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:17 pm

Yeah Kats fake claims as town and it comes across as fake its why I scum read him so much uggh

RachMarie · Post Post #880 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:20 pm

Umm since no one died that does not automatically clear TN BTW, though I have him as a town read, the other does though. As a watcher you would have seen action only if the scum killed and if TN was the victim and was NKed I would think, I do find it confusing sometimes with watcher and tracker but basically I think of it as tracker get to see what the target does and watcher gets to see what is done TO the target.

RachMarie · Post Post #881 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:21 pm

I claimed, I do not know if BB has though

tn5421 · Post Post #882 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:03 pm

Le Cupcake was my partner that I was supposed to protect.

I'm reasonably sure thats an alt of Katsuki.

I'm not sure when/what my partner claimed but your commentary on it rings true.

Iecerint · Post Post #883 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:04 pm

Katsuki claimed masons with tn. That is what makes tn confirmed town.

Yes, I know what a tracker and watcher do. I just don't take this game super seriously because I don't really think anyone does?

Iecerint · Post Post #884 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:04 pm

Cupcake = Katsuki + his ladyfriend hydra

Iecerint · Post Post #885 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:05 pm

Soooo do either or both of Rach/BB want to claim being my partner?

RachMarie · Post Post #886 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:11 pm

I would like a claim from BB for sure she is the only one I think that has not yet claimed

LOL I was verifying Iec more for myself than for you since well I do get those two confused at times even when I am a watcher or tracker lol

Iecerint · Post Post #887 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:29 pm

Remind me what you claimed, too?

RachMarie · Post Post #888 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:45 pm

In post 789, RachMarie wrote:Working will post in here soon

I am Evil Pacman And I got an extra vote if others said s'up Pacman, I gather it was something to do with the meet. Kind of a running joke. Basically other than that I am pretty much VT. Especially since he is no longer with us

Bizarre having two deaths no idea why that happened, anyone else have an idea?

RachMarie · Post Post #889 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:46 pm

That is a paraphrase of course.

Iecerint · Post Post #890 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:19 pm

Let's see what Titus and Molla claimed....

Iecerint · Post Post #891 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:20 pm

In post 332, Titus wrote:I fucking hate this as every vote on me is naked. Claims have to be done at L-2 though because I can hammer anyone at L-2.

My name is Nacho. My ability is hug it out. I can quote someone with the phrase "hug it out", preferably bolded. In my next post, I vote someone. Both my vote and the player I "hugged it out with" are considered to be voting that player in the next vote count. I've already crumbed all this and if anyone needs proof, I can provide it.

Now can we go back to lynching people who aren't fucking obviously town?

Titus's

Iecerint · Post Post #892 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:21 pm

In post 602, BBmolla wrote:I'm Iecerint, the only vanilla in the game

In post 631, BBmolla wrote:Informed Townie would be the correct rolename but MoS thinks Lyncher is a role so...

OK, so he claimed informed VT and maybe tried to crumb being friends with me but who can say what's true.

Iecerint · Post Post #893 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:23 pm

One or both of Titus and RachMarie got crappy fakeclaims. :/

RachMarie · Post Post #894 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:20 pm

I need to reread did BBmolla really claim Lyncher?

tn5421 · Post Post #895 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:53 pm

I think he's implying he was the lynch target.

Wouldn't that lead to him being 'informed'?

Iecerint · Post Post #896 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:15 pm

If that's the case, it implies that scum is aware of the lyncher mechanic, meaning that the remaining scum is a Mafia Lyncher rather than being a separate mafia and lyncher between BB and Rach.

Katsuki · Post Post #897 (ISO) » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:56 pm

In post 884, Iecerint wrote:Cupcake = Katsuki + his ladyfriend hydra

That's quite a surprising statement, usually people ask if we're twins.

tn5421 · Post Post #898 (ISO) » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:51 am

In post 897, Katsuki wrote:
In post 884, Iecerint wrote:Cupcake = Katsuki + his ladyfriend hydra

That's quite a surprising statement, usually people ask if we're twins.

w-well, is it your lady friend?

tn5421 · Post Post #899 (ISO) » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:52 am

In post 896, Iecerint wrote:If that's the case,
it implies that scum is aware of the lyncher mechanic
, meaning that the remaining scum is a Mafia Lyncher rather than being a separate mafia and lyncher between BB and Rach.

How so? I thought you didn't know who you were supposed to lynch?

You didn't lie to us, did you?