Oops, meant to vote last post.
VOTE: Ort
@Kinetic-
I am not strawmanning him, I'm pointing out that my choice makes no sense as scum.
The point is that if you are scum, then you obviously did not use a plague on CTD, and your claim to do so is a lie.
Feel free to continue telling Charter it makes no sense for Kinetic as scum to use plague on CTD. He isn't arguing that point. Arguing against that point is arguing against a straw man.
-It is wifom. There is no clear townie motivation and no clear scum motivation for you claiming to have plagued CTD. Saying that scum wouldn't have any motivation to do that and therefore implying that you are a townie is building a case out of wifom.
-My question that you quoted is not a repeat of the previous. I am asking why you CLAIMED your night action. This is separate from why you PERFORMED your night action. What motivation does Kinetic the townie have for telling everyone that he used a plague on a dead player?
@Ace-
If Kinetic has been protected by an apothecary then we are in one of these cases:
-Kinetic lied about his cards and therefore probably scum.
-Kinetic has a teammate who used an apothecary on him.
-Random townie felt Kinetic was such a strong townie that he decided to apothecary Kinetic AND Kinetic knew that Random townie felt this way and had an apothecary.
Third option is unlikely to the point of not worth considering.
@Ortolan-
I will note that CTD did name DGB as his top suspect for Budja's scum buddy. I think it is a mistake to assume CTD dying means CTD's top suspect is scum. That would be a very foolish assumption.
I am watching DGB, and I agree that DGB is not playing like a clear townie (in particular, I did not like how DGB's vote kept flying around near the end of Day 1 with little explanation). But I definitely think your actions are more scummy.
-The primary difference between your play and CTD's play is that CTD actually voted in a manner that indicated he was trying to lynch scum. You held a similar position to CTD, and went further and called Charter a probable townie. But when it looked like Charter might be lynched, instead of taking action to lynch your number 2 scum and avoid the lynch of your number 1 townie, you tried to pull people away from your number 2 scum's wagon and onto other players who were not anywhere near being lynched.
-The problem I see with your vote is not that it was the 6th vote, but that you were so unwilling to place a vote on Budja at any point when it might have mattered, but as soon as it no longer mattered, you placed your vote. If you were making a point of voting for your most suspicious person (DGB?) and kept your vote there at end of day, that would make a bit more sense. But instead, you choose to move to Budja after it no longer mattered. What changed that made it worthwhile to place your vote on Budja?
@Ace-
I think you're misreading Ort. He is either suggesting that I am scumbuddies with DGB (hence DGB never voting Kast), or chastising me for not seeing that DGB was trying to buddy with me (I'm not clear which he's aiming for).
