Might I point out that none of these three reasons point to anything actually incriminating of dana. He had the same behavior last game we played together really.Fate wrote:ARBITRARY EXCUSE NOT TO PROVIDE CONTENT FOR THREE DAYS? CHECK.
SCUMMALICIOUS FIRST POST ABOUT DEALING WITH FATE AND META APPEALS? CHECK.
MEMBER OF THE VI BRIGADE AND DETRIMENT TO THE TOWN AT LARGE? CHECK.
CONFIRM VOTE: DANA
Arbitrary excuse for not providing content...? Lots of people had low content posts and/or posting to at least appear active. Just because dana had the lowest post count doesn't imply scumminess. Maybe he didn't feel like discussing how we should handle roles or nukes.
Scumalicious first post about dealing with Fate and meta appeals...? You were on his nuts before he posted his first content post, why would you think you wouldn't be brought up, especially given the history between you two (as he makes apparent you don't approve of his style)? And given it's discussion only on Day 1, there is very little to go on except meta of previous style and play.
Member of the VI Brigade and detriment to the town at large...? This is just your own personal bias. In fact, it's not even a declaration you think he is scum, but terrible town. The basis of my calling you a policy lyncher, especially given the follow up vote.
The flip flopping is about you gladly wanting to get rid of anyone that doesn't like you, from Me, to dana, to chess, to Jed. You don't necessarily have to have voted us in DEFCON 3, but you have done proxy votes prior, and you have been vocal about getting rid of any one of us since DEFCON 3 started. Your votes have jumped around to whomever was going to get the pressure, so it's not you who is actually leading the wagons, but just going where the votes go for people you want to get rid of... hence, flip flopping.
I would dare say you are a detriment to town far before dana is my friend.
)))
