Community Redux | Postgame

Morning Tweet · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 4:47 pm

I still don't wreally know what Flavia means. I can see how it looks like a miller claim now that you point it out Titus

In post 64, Meuh wrote:Idk exactly how to describe why I like 49, it just feels right. May be one of those cases when someone makes a post that's NAI but I just find it funny/enjoyable so I TR them for it. If so I don't mind because either way a smile was brought to my face, heehee :]

The thing with the votes on me is that I do think my page 1 wasn't super fantastic. Because of that it was weird for me to engage with 15 (this of itself may sound too self-aware lmao, and this remark too but whatever).

In a basic sense I think votes on me = bad because I'm confirmed townie in my own eyes, but I see justification for it via my page 1 so I'm in a murky state of "oh no, votes on me!" and "yeah but this isn't necessarily bad because there's reasonable basis for a vote this early" so I don't know how to react to it. Still need to derust a bit.

Also I took a look at the cancelled game's setup and now I'm scared... :0
My biggest note is the 9/4/1 ratio, combined with only 2 vts makes me think this is the type of game that gets won or lost on night actions. Should be interesting because that doesn't feel standard for this site. But yeah, a lot of scum roles is not a pretty sight. Hopefully, the third party role doesn't get to kill this time around because that swing potential is my worst nightmare. >_>

When you say you r page 1 wasn't fanatastic, what is it that you mean by that?

Titus · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:00 pm

I need that explicitly confirmed or denied. That is why I mentioned those three people. They all hadn't posted.

Frogsterking · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:01 pm

In post 73, KittyTacky wrote:Meuh doesn't seem like scum. MT probs town too.

Did scum only know one of their partners by this point in time in the OG setup?

Frogsterking · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:03 pm

In post 70, KittyTacky wrote:
In post 29, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 28, KittyTacky wrote:Meow! I remember some of you.
VOTE: Nonexistent Hydra
Gross. Add Kitty to my scum reads with meuh and bell.
k

Why do you sound so defeated?

In post 73, KittyTacky wrote:Meuh doesn't seem like scum. MT probs town too.

Why Meuh and MT in particular? Were you trying to communicate something?

Herta · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:04 pm

In post 69, Meuh wrote:Pepedit: That sentence somehow managed to age horribly extremely fast!

Tbf it's like bare minimum effort atp. On my part not tweetie's.

Frogsterking · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:06 pm

In post 76, Titus wrote:I need that explicitly confirmed or denied. That is why I mentioned those three people. They all hadn't posted.

Why are you being so pro active right now?

Frogsterking · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:09 pm

In post 67, Herta wrote:Preliminary tweet town read.

Why did you post this Herta? Trying to communicate something to tweet?

In post 69, Meuh wrote:Haven't gotten scumpings yet, tbh. I tried taking another look through people's posts when Nancy asked for reads; the only thing that really stuck out to me as meh is Herta's lack of anything of relevance to the game in any of their posts. I guess that's something.

Herta? I think you missed this? Are you not reading Meuh's posts?

Morning Tweet · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:28 pm

Well if that were a traitor crumb i'd have missed it caause it looks like any other naked early game read

Frogsterking · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:28 pm

In post 69, Meuh wrote:Pedit: Haven't gotten scumpings yet, tbh. I tried taking another look through people's posts when Nancy asked for reads; the only thing that really stuck out to me as meh is Herta's lack of anything of relevance to the game in any of their posts. I guess that's something.

I'm starting to get concerned now because I was about to townlock you but I can't tell if you have a pro town agenda for not outing your scum reads. If I can't townread you then I'm pretty much back to square 0 as far as my reads go. If I can townread you so much to start a townblock with you, then I think the Nonexistent Hydra is most likely to be scum because I don't like how they came after you.

My problems are mainly just that I'm surprised you didn't say more about Tweet, they drew my attention the most with that long, static post they wrote. Also, KT's townread on you looked a bit muggy, like they're trying to pocket you. Is there any reason you don't have scum pings on KT and Tweet?

Morning Tweet · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:31 pm

Why'd my mech spec post draw your attention Frog it should be fairly NAI I broguth it up because i wasnt sure if everyobne knebw the other thread got a new post

Herta · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:31 pm

In post 81, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 67, Herta wrote:Preliminary tweet town read.
Why did you post this Herta? Trying to communicate something to tweet?

In post 69, Meuh wrote:Haven't gotten scumpings yet, tbh. I tried taking another look through people's posts when Nancy asked for reads; the only thing that really stuck out to me as meh is Herta's lack of anything of relevance to the game in any of their posts. I guess that's something.
Herta? I think you missed this? Are you not reading Meuh's posts?

Yes I'm communicating an early town read

No I did not miss that post and why would you think that?

Is it possible for you to solve without being confrontational or is this just scum you? I think it could go either way with you.

Frogsterking · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:33 pm

In post 82, Morning Tweet wrote:Well if that were a traitor crumb i'd have missed it caause it looks like any other naked early game read

In other words, you prefer that I don't consider whether herta crumbed you as traitor? Also, you believe that what herta wrote is too vague to be construed as a traitor crumb?

Morning Tweet · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:34 pm

I'm saying it looks nothing like a crumb yeah. I'm probablyt getting in tyhe way of a reaction test or something

Frogsterking · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:39 pm

Chill, you two seem a little on edge. I'm just asking questions.

I take it that MT and Herta both are vehement that Herta *did not* crumb traitor to MT and that Herta should *definitely* be ruled out as a traitor?

In post 84, Morning Tweet wrote:Why'd my mech spec post draw your attention Frog it should be fairly NAI I broguth it up because i wasnt sure if everyobne knebw the other thread got a new post

That's interesting!

So why do you think Herta townread you then if your only real post is NAI? Did you say anything when Herta townread you? Seems like odd timing for him doesn't it if you think you only wrote NAI schtuff?

Frogsterking · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:43 pm

In post 84, Morning Tweet wrote:Why'd my mech spec post draw your attention Frog it should be fairly NAI I broguth it up because i wasnt sure if everyobne knebw the other thread got a new post

In post 67, Herta wrote:Preliminary tweet town read.

Hmm. Yeah. I reread, and it looks like you were more interested in questioning flavia when herta outed his read on you, tweet. How come you didn't react when herta had a preliminary townread on you for posting "fairly NAI" content? It just seems a little dodgy..

Frogsterking · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:50 pm

In post 56, Meuh wrote:
In post 38, Herta wrote:
In post 36, Meuh wrote:
In post 14, Herta wrote:Hardclaim ninja blasphemer.

VOTE: deas
Also I know this is a joke but it's been bugging me because I don't know, what's a blasphemer?
Every time someone posts a swear I get a dayvig.

I figure the game will be over by Friday.
Fuck shit fuck

@Herta
shoot the people voting for me

What were you thinking here, Meuh?

Titus · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 5:51 pm

In post 80, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 76, Titus wrote:I need that explicitly confirmed or denied. That is why I mentioned those three people. They all hadn't posted.
Why are you being so pro active right now?

Deliberately ignores question until after Flavia clarifies and/or all players have posted.

RH · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:00 pm

N.Y. M replaces Nonexistent Hydra.

Frogsterking · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:08 pm

In post 91, Titus wrote:
In post 80, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 76, Titus wrote:I need that explicitly confirmed or denied. That is why I mentioned those three people. They all hadn't posted.
Why are you being so pro active right now?
Deliberately ignores question until after Flavia clarifies and/or all players have posted.

And is there any reason I can't argue that you're being lamist?

Frogsterking · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:22 pm

In post 73, KittyTacky wrote:Meuh doesn't seem like scum. MT probs town too.

I feel like this post is going to save our Community Redux.

Titus · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:45 pm

In post 93, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 91, Titus wrote:
In post 80, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 76, Titus wrote:I need that explicitly confirmed or denied. That is why I mentioned those three people. They all hadn't posted.
Why are you being so pro active right now?
Deliberately ignores question until after Flavia clarifies and/or all players have posted.
And is there any reason I can't argue that you're being lamist?

You can argue 2 plus 2 equals 6. Can't stop you.

In all seriousness, I'll explain after the conditions are met.

Titus · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 6:46 pm

In post 92, RH wrote:
N.Y. M replaces Nonexistent Hydra.

Who is this?

Herta · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:08 pm

N.Y. M (Hydra of Nancy Drew 39, mastina and Yume)

Morning Tweet · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:40 pm

In post 89, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 84, Morning Tweet wrote:Why'd my mech spec post draw your attention Frog it should be fairly NAI I broguth it up because i wasnt sure if everyobne knebw the other thread got a new post

In post 67, Herta wrote:Preliminary tweet town read.
Hmm. Yeah. I reread, and it looks like you were more interested in questioning flavia when herta outed his read on you, tweet. How come you didn't react when herta had a preliminary townread on you for posting "fairly NAI" content? It just seems a little dodgy..

Are you saying that I ought to have reacted? Why?

Morning Tweet · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Thu Dec 22, 2022 7:43 pm

In post 88, Frogsterking wrote:Chill, you two seem a little on edge. I'm just asking questions.

I take it that MT and Herta both are vehement that Herta *did not* crumb traitor to MT and that Herta should *definitely* be ruled out as a traitor?

In post 84, Morning Tweet wrote:Why'd my mech spec post draw your attention Frog it should be fairly NAI I broguth it up because i wasnt sure if everyobne knebw the other thread got a new post
That's interesting!

So why do you think Herta townread you then if your only real post is NAI? Did you say anything when Herta townread you? Seems like odd timing for him doesn't it if you think you only wrote NAI schtuff?

Again, you're reaching here frog. You aren't saying why I ought to have reacted, other than weakly implying that since i view a post of mine as NAI, I therefore should find it questionable that someone finds something towny

That's like, level 0 thinking, and i feel like you don't really believe that