Look at our 'LyLo' days. Heck, look at the final day. 4:2.
By the by, snifit, the accusation about our reads not being good kind of hurt; it was obvious we were doing well with those we
In post 650, Tierce wrote:By the by, snifit, the accusation about our reads not being good kind of hurt
In post 652, Tierce wrote:That is about as good as "they are calling themselves obvTown, Town doesn't do that". Which issilly. Of course Town does that. Yes, it can be obnoxious. It's not scummy, though, and this game is a shining example of that.
There are reasons to be wary of competent players, but that only means that one's own scumhunting on them needs to be on a corresponding level of competence. Calling for lynches on Scummies/high scum win rates is nonsensical.
You still don't see it, do you?In post 653, snifit wrote:The read on me came out of nowhere as well
Your read on Xalxe felt like you presenting it from an informed position. No one has information like that on D1 except scum... and Masons. I mentioned it during the game: this is the kind of weird I-know-this-player's-alignment-and-they-know-mine that makes Masons look scummy. Cops suffer from similar cases on smaller games, when they are forced to justify Townreads without claiming. The read was reasonable and I'm actually proud I spotted it; the thing is that the kind of alignment knowledge it was based on was Mason-Mason. That interaction was, in fact, one of the large factors in decreasing my paranoia level about you.Extremely Thoughtful (Hydra) Chat wrote:Ty: By the by, I don't think lynching snifit at any stage is a good plan. There was something that was nagging me earlier, before he started answering. Let's see if I can find it again.
Ty: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4386641
Ty: This post.
Ty: It rings of scum reading Town.
Ty: And that he didn't even consider this "Counterpoint to that would be he's scum who wants to revive and kill someone he knows is a strong town player, but nah." for Thor, just for Xalxe.
Ty: Because... when you look at that post, I get the impression that that is not how Town would get a read on Xalxe-town. Yes, it might be a towntell, but it's the kind of towntell that is spotted by scum, not by Town.
Six: It reads way too much into Xalxe's motivations
The -mechanic- is scum-sided.In post 659, saulres wrote:I realize that everyone keeps saying this game is scum-sided, but I'm just not seeing it with all the conftown. I'll have to analyze it to see why people are saying that.
In post 624, Thor665 wrote:In post 607, Xisiqomelir wrote:Good job Voided, Whiskers, Tierce and Vi and "oh dear" to Thor.
Oh come on - I called Josh first I believe and also opposed the Konowa wagon at the appropriate spot. My only misread was Piggy and (functionally) Sixty. And though I opposed some town revives I did argue for other town revives and even dropped my Piggy push when I heard the case on her and agreed she as suspect enough not to be pushing for.
I'll admit maybe I always read N bad - he just always looks scummy to me.
In post 666, snifit wrote:Huh? You could say "Oh dear" to everyone who bothered to post reads if that's your threshold for criticism.
In post 659, saulres wrote:If scum do need more power, maybe they should be able to take someone from Limbo directly to dead? Or at least make the unrevivable?