In post 638, Jake from State Farm wrote:if he is town I will forever be wondering why he waited until 1 day before deadline to finally speak out about how "bad" my case supposedly was despite posting numerous after I originally stated my case and why he waited 3 days before deadline to even speak out against serra's lynch. He says I have been pushing serra since the 4th day, where was he the remainder of those days?
keeping your moth shut until deadline isn't town motivated at all.
In post 639, Jake from State Farm wrote:I also want to know why he has an issue with me "supposedly" tunneling serra since the 4th day and I am bad because of it (despite making an actual case), yet serra has been tunneling darth since day 3 (without even attempting to make a case) and that's perfectly acceptable?
no that isn't town motivation either.
ME? What about you. How the fuck do you think your lying, your bullshit, your play is in anyway pro-town? It didn't work in Monopoly, it hasn't worked in other game, how the fuck do you think it works here?
You wouldn't know town-motivation if it slapped you on the face and made off with your anal virginity.
Your case on Serra is tunnelling. Glad you now admit that you were wrong (and lying) and that you were on Serra since was 4 days in. Nice try at deflecting when the focus is on you and your case.
You completely fail to grasp that I didn't have a scumread on Serra at all, so why would I be suspicious of him? Just because I may not agree with Serra's case on Darthe, does not mean I instantly scum-read him, or suddenly read him as scum because of inactivity. It's not a scum tell, especially in this game, despite your frothing logorrhea trying to tell us otherwise.
Having over 4 days till deadline is PLENTY of time disagree with a wagon. Serra wasn't even the leading wagon at that time! Despite your best efforts, there is no problem with trying to start discussion and offer alternatives
WHILST THERE IS STILL TIME
. But you can't grasp anything that isn't a yes, can you.
As for my own activity, which you're trying paint here as scummy too (which is amusing still considering the game-state):
In post 509, SafetyDance wrote:We have plenty of time. There's things I want to discuss too when I can free some time.
In post 418, SafetyDance wrote:Sorry guys but I am now at /LA indefinitely as I can only access at work until laptop is fixed. I'm not sure what I will do on the weekend, will think of something.
If you can't grasp any reason out of that then please, do us all a favor and replace out. Mafia is not a game for you.
In post 631, Jake from State Farm wrote:Found it myself.
Safety - I made my case on Serra on the 16th or so. Why did you wait 4 days before deadline to finally speak out? Why did you wait 1 day before to argue my points and offer a counter lynch?
For someone who opposes this lynch so much, you certainly waited until the worst possible moment to speak up
Friday morning of a Sunday night lynch. That's 2.5 days, not 1. It's even more now that it's been extended.
Why must you lie Jake? Why are you trying to hard here to warp everything I say - when you don't ignore, it I might add - just because I don't agree with your case, whilst none of the points I've made you've actually refuted, just trying to turn it into a pissing contest against others or me, when I've shown you how it stacks up compared to other players.
It's because I'm a threat to you isn't it? Because I don't drink the JFSF-Koolaid. That or you really are completely dense.