I thought he was scummy yesterday, it was just that one of the points was not that good it turned out.Sotty7 wrote: Annoying = Scummy?
Post or perish.You think just slapping a vote on him with no questioning actually help matters?
Can you give some post numbers for when you think these different things were happening? I'm having trouble following your interpretation of events.xRECKONERx 548 wrote:Yeah, after it was obvious ortolan was going to be the lynch IMO. Earlier in the day, as ort was gaining steam, I noted in my catchup post that he jumped ship for hohum, then ended up going back to ortolan. Felt like a pseudo attempt to start up another wagon.
Is lack of interaction more scummy than chainsawing in defence?Debonair Danny DiPietro 555 wrote:Vote: Sotty
Ortolan quotes her once in a response and that's it. Whenever he's mentioned by Sotty early it was almost invariably within the context of hohum and Percy where she's extremely indecisive in regards to him, but late in the day he pops up on her willing to wagon list and it's not really clear why until her vote post. I also have issue with her tone which just seems very off to me.
DDD's case is the lack of involvement (+ "tone"). Why are you saying it's both "meh" and "really telling"?xRECKONERx 564 wrote:DDD's "case" on Sotty is meh, but Sotty's lack of involvement with ortolan is actually a really telling tell... I've seen it happen a lot, and I know when I'm scum, I either bus the hell out of my partners or try to ignore them for the most part.
Is this all you are going to grace us with?hohum 565 wrote:Vote Percy
What is it about Jahudo that you find suspicious?Jack 572 wrote:Jahudo seemed scummiest to start and could be my main choice, but hohum turning up with just a vote is annoying.
Ok, I can believe that based on how you said you liked ortolan's interactions with kyle, and instead of calling him 'bad man' you said 'inscrutable man'. Which sounds more neutral.ekiM wrote:335 I drop xRx/kyle and name hohum, DDD, ortolan as my suspicions, hohum/DDD ahead of ortolan.
If that's true than why start the DDD wagon instead of adding your support to the existing hohum wagon at that time?ekiM wrote:Deadline was close. I was ambivalent between hohum and DDD. 336 I put the DDD vote out there to see if there was any interest, otherwise I was planning on pushing hohum.
You had addressed that misrepresentation back in 351, before you switched your vote to hohum. Were you thinking that it made hohum looks scummier back then? Or did it take until after you switched your vote to consider implications of hohum being scum?ekiM wrote:381/384 I started thinking about possible scumteams with hohum. I doubted Locke and Sotty's reactions to the hohum case. "I read him as town" with no elaboration was suspect. Sotty had been misrepping the hohum case.
Well WIFOM, but that's a reasonable way to look at it. One thing you were doing around the same time was giving your reasons against a Jack lynch, which would be accomplishing the opposite of derailing an ortolan wagon.ekiM wrote:Now, you say that my suspicion of anti-hohum-case people could be an indirect way to detail the ortolan wagon. Two points of response: first, there was one person on the ortolan wagon at that point, with a day until deadline. If I was ortolan's scum buddy I don't think it'd be worrying me that much.
I'll look at that next.ekiM wrote:Can I ask if you find Locke chainsawing Vi for pushing ortolan, and explicitly denouncing the possibility of the ortolan wagon happening in time more or less suspect?
************Vi wrote:The whole conspiracy about hohum "waiting" before accusing xRx is utter dreck. In case you missed it, hohum was multiposting, catching up to each response as he saw it. This should be obvious by how hohum finally got to flinter's post "don't lynch xRx" long after she actually made it and hohum had already responded to earlier posts twice.
In (207) hohum responds to (206) with a lengthy post and about 8 linksOrtolan-206 wrote:what's with the ultimatums from people who are nowhere close to being lynched?
hohum I would like to know the totality of reasons for your vote on Percy at this point in time.
It could be. That's not really something I weigh real heavily.Amished wrote:@Jack: Fine, look at hohum attacking Ortolan. Does that look like scum attacking a buddy?
hohum wrote:If you're not going to rectify your lurking problem
hohum wrote:So you think calling out lurkers in a game with tight deadline is scummy? We should continue to allow people to lurk?
It's no longer yesterday.xRECKONERx wrote:hohum (Yes, as ekiM has said, much of hohum's play has been weaksauce so far, but I don't think not commenting on a replacement qualifies as a valid scumtell. Weak play includes that shitty ass "hai guyz mah vote is teh finalz!11!!!1" when we weren't even close to deadline and especially now that's it has been extended, but there's something about hohum's play that gives off a VT vibe. I dunno. I'll keep my eye on him, but he's not the lynch for today.)