This should have been your first instinct.animorpherv1 wrote:So, I'll go back and read the last few pages. I'll note whatever I see scummy.
Not your 'okay, I guess..."
Passively waiting = antitown.
This should have been your first instinct.animorpherv1 wrote:So, I'll go back and read the last few pages. I'll note whatever I see scummy.
I agree with you on this point. I think I mentioned this earlier but not so eloquently.
Secondly, I don't like how Snow_bunny is hard and loose with her FOS's and voting on DN. She's parroting cases on the people that look the most scummy. Also, your accusation that FL's vigging leading the town is misleading...she has vigged people and we are lynching other people.She's not vigging and saying 'now we kill this guy'.
Can you cite anything for this?
His answers to his accusations and his lack of play/defense since then make me think he's given up. Which is a tell itself- scum give up more often than townies do.
Ok, so explain to me how I'm controlling the lynch with my vigs. Snow Bunny as well
But, before I say anything else, I'm with Snow_Bunyn on the FL vig-kill thing. I assume you people don't look at the MBF flash, like ever. If you haven't there is such things as a Mafia Day Killer.
Do you have any reasoning at all for this? WHY don't you like it?
FL: Seems to have the town's power under her finger tips. I don't like it.
Hrmm, that should read "His answers to his accusations are non-existent"forbiddanlight wrote:Can you cite anything for this?
His answers to his accusations and his lack of play/defense since then make me think he's given up. Which is a tell itself- scum give up more often than townies do.
Sorry, I didn't mean the former, I meant the "scum give up more than townies do"
Hrmm, that should read "His answers to his accusations are non-existent"
A mistake that seems to have become increasingly common these days. Guess I've been playing too few games lately ^-^.
And sorry, I had just read that you were a female too. *facepalm*
That's nice
This is my posting style. If you want to see more, Fast and The Furious Mafia. Alright, I was scum there, but it's my posting style none the less. I need to work on it.
If one person has everyone under their fingertips, and if they are scum, then they lead the town to a loss. Nothing else needs to be said, and I figured it was fairly obvious. Also, if you need more, if the "leader'' screws up, the town suffers.Do you have any reasoning at all for this? WHY don't you like it?
FL: Seems to have the town's power under her finger tips. I don't like it.
I'm sorry, you haven't posted for 22/23 pages. I want a lot more than just some half assed one liners from you.
Ok, I see three problems here.
If one person has everyone under their fingertips, and if they are scum, then they lead the town to a loss. Nothing else needs to be said, and I figured it was fairly obvious. Also, if you need more, if the "leader'' screws up, the town suffers.
Your confidence is admirable. Your posting style itself, less so.animorpherv1 wrote:This is my posting style. If you want to see more, Fast and The Furious Mafia. Alright, I was scum there, but it's my posting style none the less. I need to work on it.
How about anything exonerating?animorpherv1 wrote:So, I went through the thread in search of DN's posts, and I didn't really find anything incriminating, in my opinon.
I'd say that townies are more inclined to try to lead the town (scum tend to be cowards), but less likely to have any success.forbiddanlight wrote:2. How is the act of leading itself necessarily scummy and worth an FoS?
I'll be honest. I do not WANT any of you listening to me for any advice further than my confirmable actions. I am terrible at scumhunting and will likely "lead" everyone to failure. do NOT turn your brains off, ok?I personally see no reason to say FL is scummy because she's leading the town. It can mean the town is sheepish, but it doesn't say anything bout the leader :S
How is that relevant? I don't think it will hurt the quality of my scumhunting.forbiddanlight wrote:I'd rather not. You're already dead anyway.You're welcome to follow me sheepishly instead.
Cept you are twice confirmed scum. Or at least third party. Anti town in some way or you wouldn't have lied.
How is that relevant? I don't think it will hurt the quality of my scumhunting.
If the same person killed Amished as it virtually mod-confirmed, I have a great deal of trouble believe them to be pro-town.Socio wrote: Although, the second I saw Reck die, I knew with 96% accuracy exactly who it was, from my own meta reasons. And for those reasons, I can guarantee with about the same accuracy that they're town.
I think he was kidding, but I understand .
How about no (see Rule 3). The next player who asks for a scumbuddy claim receives an Official Warning (asking for a player to perform a modkillable action is a Rule 1 (Jackassery) violation; dramonic is getting off with an unofficial warning this time). - Tar
I didn't lie. dramonic is going to be the day 3 lynch.forbiddanlight wrote:Cept you are twice confirmed scum. Or at least third party. Anti town in some way or you wouldn't have lied.
How is that relevant? I don't think it will hurt the quality of my scumhunting.