Micro 1078: Datisi's micro normals are back [dead pt]

[Skygazer]

just kidding u are good mod

[Skygazer]

constantly amazed by how many people dont check the setup section in the rules that has all the multitasking/daytalk tidbits. makes me wanna put like a secret codeword to PM me with in the ruleset of my next game to see who's actually reading lol

not a dig at tris i see a lot of ppl do it

[anahit]

evil moderator

simple loyal fruit vendor

secret codeword

!! new variation on the fruit vendor game idea

same as the previous idea only this time it is queued in the micro queue as an open and the moderator very sneakily answers the bastard questions 'yes'

and the vanilla town is replaced by a werewolf grandmother (third party reflexive vigilante)

[anahit]

secretly replaced of course

[hellbooks]

it's not good for me to read the game thread bc i forget that i died and i almost start typing out a post

[Skygazer]

bye adam sandler

[Skygazer]

but same

[Skygazer]

re: pronouns

they did change but im fairly indifferent to what im called these days

[fireisredsir]

Eh whatever. Fire is probably screaming at me in the dead thread.

VOTE: meuh

i would never

[Skygazer]

do yall think this will be a town win or loss

[Datisi]

they're playing a datisi game, they've all already lost

[fireisredsir]

im p concerned about baltar still, i don't really feel like he's solving rn he's just letting skitter lead and clear him

[Ausuka]

do yall think this will be a town win or loss

Loss

[anahit]

if skygazer is being tricksy and following datisi’s yes/no question rules then the answer might in theory be ‘yes’

at a quick glance i am unsure if datisi’s ruleset even allows for a draw since there is no mention of how a

no elimination/no nightkill

cycle would be broken (or even a mention of no elimation as an achievable outcome outside of running out the clock for the day unless i am missing something) so it would assumedly continue indefinitely

and all living players dying simultaneously also seems quite unlikely

and even then because of the way win conditions are worded any non-win outcome could conceivably be categorised as a loss for town, even if it was a co-loss

though, hm, hmhmhm, i suppose not winning does not necessarily mean losing and there is no defined way to lose the game, which i think would be the same as asking if we think the town will win, because the answer would only then be ‘yes’ if we believed the town would win the game and ‘no’ if we believed the town would not win, as losing is an undefined outcome,

but anyway i think i will still go with yes

[Datisi]

agh, the no lim / no kill was brought up in my last game, i really should define that in my ruleset

[Skygazer]

i think games should go indefinitely in the event of a no kill/no lim cycle until one team has enough of it all and concedes

[anahit]

it is probably ~very bad that i like to read everyone's rulesets but also anytime i think about moderating i want my ruleset to simply read:

1. be kind
2. do not cheat

[Meuh]

meuh posting the british flag and being like i dont see that much red on it made me laugh so much lol

Heehee thank you

[Meuh]

Wish I would've went after Baltar harder, now that I'm reading this thread

[Meuh]

But I think if Skitter gets nked, I can see any of them be the lim tomorrow

[Meuh]

Though scum could theoretically justify not killing Skitter, but that makes things very weird

[Meuh]

Me from post 1699 to 1708, truly

[fireisredsir]

hi meuh!!

[fireisredsir]

if it is baltar im really curious if he decides to kill skitter or not

and if he doesn't, whether she re-evaluates

[fireisredsir]

im not like sold on it being baltar tho i think it def could be osuka

i think i just kinda like to think that it isn't the easy answer?