Good point.opie wrote:I think if we concentrate on who is the most suspicious, the least suspicious will become apparent and that is who should be awarded immunity.
Somehow true... But that kind of action seems attracting attentions, I still have a doubt that a scum would attract attention like that.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
Hello Mr. WIFOM. How are you today?Holy wrote:Somehow true... But that kind of action seems attracting attentions, I still have a doubt that a scum would attract attention like that.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
I find it pretty awesome. Playing a different game often makes you think differently about a more normal game, causing you to have more good insight.Boggzie wrote:I'm having trouble seeing anything as "scummy" this early, and the way we're supposed to play this game.
Frankly, I'm terribly confused at the moment. I'm seeing it as playing backwards, i.e. awarding immunity. It's...weird.
That's bull. Everyone would want themselves to be immune - if they are scum, they're safe and can mislead the town; if they're town, they can be sure that scum wasn't given immunity. 'Nuff said.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
Correct. That's why it hasn't gone anywhere. All in good time, my friend. But for now... well, we need to start somewhere. Mostly, everyone needs to say more. Come up with a strategy. Make unfounded accusations. Say anything that's on your mind. This is supposed to be an open, transparent system. That way, we get ideas flowing, get thinking, and can root out scum better.Boggzie wrote:Frankly, I'm terribly confused at the moment. I'm seeing it as playing backwards, i.e. awarding immunity. It's...weird.
LOL! But you must admit it, logically it's true if that person is sane of course, well WIFOM again... XDhasdgfas wrote:Hello Mr. WIFOM. How are you today?Holy wrote:Somehow true... But that kind of action seems attracting attentions, I still have a doubt that a scum would attract attention like that.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
Okay, one thing a pro-town does know is that him/herself is innocent, that's why I didn't accuse him as scummy for that. Yes, I still have doubt of his townie-ness, but I didn't find him that scummy either for that action (assuming that action came from a pro-town).Akonas wrote:That's bull. Everyone would want themselves to be immune - if they are scum, they're safe and can mislead the town; if they're town, they can be sure that scum wasn't given immunity. 'Nuff said.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
You know you are saying we need to start somewhere and you are FOS me for trying to start somewhere. I'm surprised no one see's the hypocrosy in this statement and my effort.Akonas wrote:That's bull. Everyone would want themselves to be immune - if they are scum, they're safe and can mislead the town; if they're town, they can be sure that scum wasn't given immunity. 'Nuff said.farside22 wrote:FOS: Akonasself immunity looks scummie.
Vote: Qman. He's lurking; he's obviously scum (and not just gone for the holidays).
Correct. That's why it hasn't gone anywhere. All in good time, my friend. But for now... well, we need to start somewhere. Mostly, everyone needs to say more. Come up with a strategy. Make unfounded accusations. Say anything that's on your mind. This is supposed to be an open, transparent system. That way, we get ideas flowing, get thinking, and can root out scum better.Boggzie wrote:Frankly, I'm terribly confused at the moment. I'm seeing it as playing backwards, i.e. awarding immunity. It's...weird.
Also,OMGUSFOSWTFBBQ:farside22.
WIFOM is one of those things that works kinda like that. Someone makes a WIFOM argument: "Scum wouldn't do X because they know that it's a bad idea."ibaesha wrote:vote: hasdgfas- Pretty much the whole WIFOM comment strikes me as scummy. Scum love to holler WIFOM to discount arguments with nothing more than 5 letters. And people just accept it.
A townie knew that him/herself is innocents but didn't have insight of his/her other innocents ally, we didn't know who to trust but ourselves of course. I didn't say it was a pro-town move, but he might be just didn't trust anybody at all for now (yes, I doubt scum would do that as the first, but after this whole discussion maybe they might do that someday), that's it.farside22 wrote:@Holy:How would it be pro-town to vote for yourself for immunity?
This is true, but scum can do the same thing stating it as pro town. He was the only one to try it before Rishi said anything. I found it something to point out. His comments back to me seem a bit extreme consider even he stated we need to start somewhere then FOS's me for doing so.Holy wrote:A townie knew that him/herself is innocents but didn't have insight of his/her other innocents ally, we didn't know who to trust but ourselves of course. I didn't say it was a pro-town move, but he might be just didn't trust anybody at all for now (yes, I doubt scum would do that as the first, but after this whole discussion maybe they might do that someday), that's it.farside22 wrote:@Holy:How would it be pro-town to vote for yourself for immunity?
Why would you vote against me if you were not sure yourself if it pro-town move? Your comments and vote are contridictory.Holy wrote:A townie knew that him/herself is innocents but didn't have insight of his/her other innocents ally, we didn't know who to trust but ourselves of course. I didn't say it was a pro-town move, but he might be just didn't trust anybody at all for now (yes, I doubt scum would do that as the first, but after this whole discussion maybe they might do that someday), that's it.farside22 wrote:@Holy:How would it be pro-town to vote for yourself for immunity?
opie wrote:I think Akonas self-vote for immunity is a bit of a null tell at the moment, I can see why both town and scum would want immunity and would try to vote for themselves.
Let me clear this, opie's right about it's a bit of a null tell. But with hisfarside22 wrote:Why would you vote against me if you were not sure yourself if it pro-town move? Your comments and vote are contridictory.
Yeah, just throw me that WIFOM-er accusation for this. Lame, I know...Holy wrote:A townie knew that him/herself is innocents but didn't have insight of his/her other innocents ally, we didn't know who to trust but ourselves of course.
hasdgfas wrote:WIFOM is one of those things that works kinda like that. Someone makes a WIFOM argument: "Scum wouldn't do X because they know that it's a bad idea."
I think the whole self-immunity thing has been discounted; it's in the interests of both town and scum. As a townie, well, it can get things riled up, get people to jump on you (either they don't realize it, or they're trying to mislead the town).hasdgfas wrote:vote: akonas
reasons: OMGUS is bad; farside has had excellent insight so far IMO, and the whole self-immunity thing.
Yelling I think you are being extreme. I FOS'ed you. The called you hypocritical. How is this yelling?Akonas wrote:Farside was yelling at me, even though it makes perfect sense for a townie to be voting for selfimmunity Day 1. So I don't see what y'all are complaining about..
I didnt think you two as partners. I was more curious about Holy's comments then anything. You really have a way of taking things out of proportion.Right now, I'm seeing hasdgfas and farside22 as a possible scum pair. And you all may be seeing Holy and I that way (funny how people always take sides). But we seem to be arguing something that MAKES SENSE - that's the difference
Oman is not in this game. I will give Qman until Sunday to post, or I will seek replacement.Akonas wrote: Oh, and where is Oman? He posted in another thread; he's probably just about to post here.
It was not just for self-immunity. You OMGUS'ed farside without reasoning, when he had pretty good reasons for all his statements. Now you OMGUS me for voting you, saying that my vote was unreasonable because the self-immunity "scumtell" has been discounted? Fine, it is a null-tell, but that was not my only reason for voting you. OMGUSFOS'ing farside for no good reason. You OMGUS'ing me now and trying to twist my words makes me even happier with my vote.akonas wrote:I think the whole self-immunity thing has been discounted; it's in the interests of both town and scum. As a townie, well, it can get things riled up, get people to jump on you (either they don't realize it, or they're trying to mislead the town).
Vote:hasdgfas.