Mafia 50: The Big Five Oh - Game over!

XGreyjoyX · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:21 pm

I didn't get you replaced, in fact I disagreed with the decsion,but no matter what happend to you in the other game (Both you being replaced in Mafia 49 and the modding issue) should not affect your choices in this game. (Though I am slightly guilty of that my self)

Now if it has no affect on your game play, the people voting for me (other then Glork and Armix who gave theirs) must have some reason other then the dispute over the issue of alliances, so could they please give them so I can at least defend my self?

Now @Armix What about my first comment did you find as a scum tell? All me foirst comment was me commenting on the cops death and placing a random vote.

@Glork

Glork wrote:I'm tempted to vote for you because you're bringing in poor metagame reasons and using it as an excuse to vote for a player. In fact, I think I will vote you for that exact reason.
Unvote Ibby, Vote: XGreyjoyX
.

The point is, drop all HA discussion. It doens't apply, it isn't a reason to vote for someone, and there is no reason to mention it -- especially in another game. What happens in one game stays in that game. Capiche?

To address both your points
A)If I was trying to make an excuse to put vote on someone Day 1 I would Just save Randomvote that person
B)After seeing the direction the thead is heading I'm forced to see your point,thus from this point on I will not mention the alliance issue or use it as an argument.

Call it pride/a matter of princple or so forth but my vote will remain

Fritzler · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Tue Apr 25, 2006 3:19 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
XGreyjoyX wrote: Yet I have five players voting for me, of which only one of which even thinks I am scummy. The other four are voting because I spoke out agiasnt their group. Yes A fine joke indeed.
huh? I'm not in any "huggle" group. In fact Pooky and gang always try and get me lynched/night killed.

i don't always, just like 50% of the time

Twomz · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:00 pm

*cough, choose someone else's role, cough*

But moving on... does anyone have any brilliant plans for Day one?

Fritzler · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:04 pm

Twomz wrote:*cough, choose someone else's role, cough*

But moving on... does anyone have any brilliant plans for Day one?

that falls under 50% of the time

fyi

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:49 pm

XGreyjoyX wrote:I didn't get you replaced, in fact I disagreed with the decsion,but no matter what happend to you in the other game (Both you being replaced in Mafia 49 and the modding issue) should not affect your choices in this game. (Though I am slightly guilty of that my self)

I said people

like

you, and I meant that people like you overreacted to nothing, which CAUSED the decision, whether or not you agreed with it once it had happend.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:21 am

Vote Count

6 XGreyjoyX - BabyJesus, Mastermind of Sin, Fritzler, Twomz, armlx, Glork
1 ibaesha - MrBuddyLee
1 Coron - Vyolynce
1 Quig - Machiavellian-Mafia
1 themanhimself - ibaesha
1 Mastermind of Sin - XGreyjoyX
1 armlx - Noober
1 Glork - Bacde

Not Voting (6) - Save the Dragons, Bamboomancer, Coron, themanhimself, Keys Myaths, Quig

With

19

alive, it's

10

to lynch.

Glork · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:34 am

XGreyjoyX wrote:Call it pride/a matter of princple or so forth but my vote will remain

Then so shall mine.

Coron · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:29 am

:this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:30 am

Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS

roflmao.

Bacde · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:03 pm

Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS

What is

your

reasoning?

ISO · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:22 pm

This wasn't fun to talk about in 49, why are we doing it now?

Seriously, I can actually see the votes leaving XgreyjoyX when he unvotes MOS.

Coron · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:14 pm

Bacde wrote:
Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS
What is
your
reasoning?

The question is what is the reasoning against xGreywhateverx.

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:38 pm

I don't see any signs of scum for greyjoy for me to jump on that bandwagon. Instead, I will

unvote, vote: noober

. When noober asked the question about why there are not two kills per night, it sounded like as if he ordered a kill but did not get it.[/b]

Twomz · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:44 am

I'm pretty sure his comment was in response to my suggestion of 2 mafia groups. Is there some way you know that he couldn't have preformed the NK?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:53 am

Fritzler wrote:
Twomz wrote:*cough, choose someone else's role, cough*

But moving on... does anyone have any brilliant plans for Day one?
that falls under 50% of the time

fyi

It's generally a bad idea to talk about ongoing games in a different game. It's an especially bad idea when the same person is modding both games.

*kicks Fritzler and Twomz in the face*

Twomz · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:58 am

*ouch

*

Actually, I didn't discuss it... I simply pointed it out. Fritz just made a comment about an action that occured in the game (something that anyone that reads the thread can easily see). But, i suppose I'll stop talking about it...

Fritzler · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:05 am

you brought it up, i was talking in abstracts

Bamboomancer · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:09 am

sorry to do this so early but I'm going to call a brief "sort of here" till monday, when the paper for My final project is due. Thx ^.^

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:35 am

Coron wrote:
Bacde wrote:
Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS
What is
your
reasoning?
The question is what is the reasoning against xGreywhateverx.

try reading. I hear it's good for the intellect

Vyolynce · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:24 am

Noober wrote:
Vyolynce wrote:Do you not read what other people have posted?

Twomz (20) wrote:Indeed, there is of course doc protection/roleblocking (if that's the case, gj people, keep up the good work Wink ). Also, one scum group could kill on even nights and the other on odd (such as no vanilla mafia). If we have a SK, they most likely skipped their night 1 kill so they could claim protown vig later on (or so that we wouldn't think there's a SK in the game) (but, we aren't guaranteed a SK of course).
Now apply Occams razor to that and go back to my question.

Go back to which question? "Why only one kill if there might be two scum groups" or "Why not necessarily"?

Coron · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:28 am

Mastermind of Sin wrote:
Coron wrote:
Bacde wrote:
Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS
What is
your
reasoning?
The question is what is the reasoning against xGreywhateverx.
try reading. I hear it's good for the intellect

I read, as far as I can tell it's a load of shit.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:22 pm

Coron wrote:
Mastermind of Sin wrote:
Coron wrote:
Bacde wrote:
Coron wrote::this is not a good bandwagon:

Vote: MoS
What is
your
reasoning?
The question is what is the reasoning against xGreywhateverx.
try reading. I hear it's good for the intellect
I read, as far as I can tell it's a load of shit.

cuz saying it's a load of shit without pointing out any examples or saying why is really gonna convince anyone with brains...

Coron · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:46 am

Anyone with brains should realize it's a load of shit.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:32 am

Coron wrote:Anyone with brains should realize it's a load of shit.

well you're not the only one with brains here, so why don't you give a stab at using some logic for once?

Coron · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:10 am

BabyJesus wrote:
XGreyjoyX wrote:
Mastermind of Sin wrote:
vote: armlx

Note: Huggle Alliance in full effect el oh el, el em ai oh
A)Read the flavour text, he was a cop that could catch godfathers
B)We don't need that swadle started in this game too

To prevent another pissing competion over the issue of HA
I must
Unvote,Vote:MoS
, burn out the cancer before it spreads
poojy isn't in this game.....

vote XGreyjoyX

Mastermind of Sin wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
XGreyjoyX wrote:
Mastermind of Sin wrote:
vote: armlx

Note: Huggle Alliance in full effect el oh el, el em ai oh
A)Read the flavour text, he was a cop that could catch godfathers
B)We don't need that swadle started in this game too

To prevent another pissing competion over the issue of HA
I must
Unvote,Vote:MoS
, burn out the cancer before it spreads
poojy isn't in this game.....

vote XGreyjoyX
good idea.

unvote, vote: XGrayjoyX

Fritzler wrote:
Vote: XGreyJoyX

Twomz wrote:It would seem so Fritz.
Vote: XGreyJoyX

dizzam gotta love all the logic here.

armlx wrote:
Vote Greyjoy

His first comment strikes me wrong (I think it was under a scum tell somewhere) plus he is against the HA, a perfectly fine metagame call....

First person to give any kind of reasonable explanation, however It's still a little trite and he sites the reason for the semi-random vote as a reason... votes in that stage are supposed to be for silly reasons...

Glork wrote:
XGreyjoyX wrote:
Glork wrote:Um, Greyjoy... you do realize that MoS was being sarcastic/joking.
Yet I have five players voting for me, of which only one of which even thinks I am scummy. The other four are voting because I spoke out agiasnt their group. Yes A fine joke indeed.
Actually, I think you have five players voting for you because you're rehashing old news, where it doesn't belong.As far as I know, neither Armlx nor BabyJesus have any affiliation with HA. I'm not an HA member, but I'm tempted to vote for you because you're bringing in poor metagame reasons and using it as an excuse to vote for a player. In fact, I think I will vote you for that exact reason.
Unvote Ibby, Vote: XGreyjoyX
.

The point is, drop all HA discussion. It doens't apply, it isn't a reason to vote for someone, and there is no reason to mention it -- especially in another game. What happens in one game stays in that game. Capiche?

dizzam, that totally make him scum don't it?

Did I miss anything?