Acronach wrote:random.org says 8.
vote helooonewman
Acronach wrote:while calling som1 ut for dicerolling is stupid, i don't see it as a scumtell because i've seen town do it before.
This actually is slightly scummy. Using "random.org" as an excuse alleviates you of any responsibility for the vote itself. I didn't provide a reason but I did choose randomly, without the aid of a tool, which could in fact be analyzed later. The fact that you defended it is scummier. Also are you going to use annoyingly bad spelling the entire game or was this done on a phone?
camn wrote:Hmm . RVS votes. Do not like.
And random number voting?? you feeling LUCKY? you think you can throw dice and find scum?
Do not like.
That said- I am sitting here listening to some Latin-type tunes, thinking we should all nameclaim. Not NOW... but soon. Today. I would like to lock the scum into their fakeclaims early on, assuming they have any.
Doing it today precludes any night-talk coordination.
But, I welcome the rest of the town's input on this. I am not married to the idea.
Oh, and
VOTE: ACRONACH
dicerolls are scummy.
Dice rolls are scummy. Pushing for a full name claim this early is scummier. Wishy washiness on the idea and the wording of "I welcome the rest of the town's imput on this" makes it scummier still.
UNVOTE: ooba
VOTE: camn
Neither Dekes nor Starbuck are retarded, and therefore I'm assuming that they did not give us all names without providing the scum AT MINIMUM a list of characters that aren't in the set-up.
edit after reading later in the forum: my vote here is based not on her pushing us to "serious" conversation, I consider that a town move, but her blatant attempt at scoring town cred and for pushing a massclaim this early.
Acronach wrote:Tanarin wrote:Zang wrote:I'm not against a mass name claim. Although based on the flavor, it wouldnt be hard to make fake claims. If they are even needed.
That's a valid point. The other problem I see with a mass nameclaim is the fact we'll basically have to force a townie or two to fake claim. I can already think of at least one role where this would almost be a necessity. Not only that, a mass nameclaim alone COULD end up being a mass role claim as well, since with a few characters their role would become obvious.
i dont watch BSG so idk if this will be a problem for me or not.
no nameclaim please :/
...holy fucking shit, batman. Either you now win the VI award for the game or you're scum.
UNVOTE: camn
VOTE: Acronach
ooba wrote:Tanarin, if it's not much trouble, could you get a avatar .. I find it easier to remember people+posts in a game based on their avatar ..
Reg. nameclaim:
- Possible advantage as already mentioned by camn are that scum get committed to their fake claims i.e they cannot mix and match each other fakeclaims as the situation demands.
- Disadvantage is that scum will be able to guess on the relative power levels of different townies and choose their night kills based on that (For example a Starbuck claim\Lt.Gaeta claim\Specialist Cally Henderson claim).
I'd have to vote No since IMO, the possible advantage doesn't outweigh the disadvantage.
Vote: Acronach
It's not as much the random vote as the reactions to being called out on the random vote.
PS: I started watching BSG after signing up - now about to finish season 1 - it's good! One request - please use spoiler tags for major plot reveals.
Entire post QFT and acknowledgment of the request at the end, having seen the whole series myself. Totally worth watching, for the record. Back to the game:
Sir Ricardo Montalbán wrote:
Hello. First things first, this account is a hydra...
... overestimates the ease of connecting a character to a specific role. There are quite a few characters in BSG, more than enough to populate a game of 13 without running into extras ...
What is more concerning to me is the way that Tanarin was smokescreening the nameclaim from the first moment. In post #29, he allowed the possibility, but pushed it to the end of the day. Now by post #41, he claims that it will out townies, somehow. I fail to see why, short of provided fake claims, that a nameclaim would out the town and not the scum. Besides that, I feel like roles that are effectively Millers should out themselves as soon as possible, as Millers should. I don't want to have someone claim a really suspicious role in endgame and lose for it. This stuff should be out now.
Acronach wants not to nameclaim because he wouldn't be able to fakeclaim properly. I have no problem with people being unable to fakeclaim. It looks scummy, really.
Bobsnox voting camn for being serious when he could have commented on the nameclaim doesn't give me a good feeling either. The same goes for Newman. This is why being arbitrary can be scummy. Because then they don't have to comment on valid discussion.
First bit: Who are you a hydra of?
Second bit: I disagree. While I agree with you that it might be hard to pin certain abilities to certain people, at this point it is a disadvantage to assume that the power roles are that cleverly guised. It would make sense for the majority of the town's power roles to be concentrated on characters central to the series; therefore, I wouldn't want to risk outing them this early.
Third bit: I don't follow, other than the bit of "smokescreening", which I find kind of weak given Arco's current state.
Fourth bit: Yea so why isn't your vote there? Distancing from your scum buddy without busing him on D1?
Fifth bit: I follow your bit on Bobsnox but disagree with you on Newman. So far newman is trolling and that's about it. Annoying, slightly; scummy, not really.
bobsnox wrote:
2 - town cred.
You look like you're doing the same thing.
No he's really not, he pointed out something valid in your logic in attacking Caen. That being said you're striking me as overzealous town, so breathe, and let's go after the clear scum here, Acro.