Post 54, Hoopla wrote:Don't understand how people are giving her town points for her post 42, though.
Speaking for myself, her explanation for the whole "seems contrived" thing made more sense to me. Before 42, I couldn't figure out what her issue was with my posts, and I thought she was just throwing words that just sounded good together against me to see if they'd stick. 42 at least explained that her issue with me had at least some basis to it even though it was unfounded.
Post 55, Haylen wrote:Nope, a few posts earlier, you had said you were going to vote for me if I didn't post anything of game content in my next post, then you didn't give me a chance to post and voted me anyway. If you had thought I was scummy before that, why didnt you vote for me then? See what Im saying?
I noticed you posting elsewhere after I made that comment. That led me to think you were possibly lurking and deliberately choosing to be non-contributive, so I figured placing a vote on you might help bring you back into the game. Also, I wanted to see what camn would do when you had an additional vote on you. She kept calling you out on stuff and lamenting that you were prob-scum, but she still decided to not move her vote to you.
Post 55, Haylen wrote:It's a 6 player game, I'm not voting until I'm sure I've caught scum.
3 pages in to the last Lovers Mafia game we played together, you had your vote on Kmd. Why are you being so much more cautious this time around?
-~-~
I don't mind the Mindgamer pressure. I don't like the fact that he hasn't really produced much in the way of content as of yet, and the minor town tell that I found earlier was just that -- very minor.
Hoopla, why didn't you mention that you and Mindgamer have some experience playing with one another before?