Open 196 - Desert Mafia Over!

Zachrulez · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:32 am

Was that your reason?

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:39 pm

jmj wrote:I don't have an example from this site, but in most of the Mafia I have played offline, since we don't have that many people, the person that gets most targeted in the RVS has been lynched most of the time due to a quicklynch. So, I have made it my policy to not participate in the RVS.

That doesn't usually happen here (I don't think I've seen it happen yet (except the game where saberwolf selfhammered in the RVS >.<)). If there's a quicklynch, the quicklynchers die tomorrow, so vote your heart out!

Also, o.O @ Zach and Haylen

The Tracker · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:36 pm

Zachrulez wrote:Him changing his vote isn't strictly the reason I voted him.

It's why he changed his vote.

I was making a joke, nothing more. Anyway, since we're getting out of RVS I'll go ahead and

unvote

.

Shotty to the Body · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sat Jan 16, 2010 8:06 pm

Vote Count #2 D1 “The Drunken Vote Count”

Haylen (2) - farside22, DeathRowKitty
jmj3000 (1) – Cat
The Tracker (2) – Zachrulez, Haylen

Not Voting (2) - jmj3000, The Tracker

With 7 alive it will take 4 to lynch.

farside22 · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:08 am

Haylen wrote:lol, voting people who changed votes in the RVS. Amusing tactic.

unvote vote The Tracker

Mine was also not random, but for a different reason that Zachs

Did you take the vote seriously? Why did zach pointing out thetracker in his post have anything to do with his vote change when it was before the tracker switched votes.

farside22 · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:11 am

Ignore the comment about zach voting before the joke vote from the tracker.
however the following of zach from haylen question is still valid.

Haylen · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:42 am

You will all be lucky to get a post before 4.30 tomorrow. I must do my coursework. And hand it in at 4pm tomorrow.

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:32 pm

I feel out of the loop and hated.

Anyone mind explaining what the Tracker votes are for?

jmj3000 · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:41 pm

If I am correct, they voted him due to the fact that he voted me for not believing in the RVS. I am not sure though, and would like Zach or Hayl to confirm or deny that please.

Haylen · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:18 am

Zachrulez wrote:Was that your reason?

Heh, see I thought you're voting him because he voted twice in the RVS. Every game anyone's done that (voted twice), they get penalised for it.

I was making a point by voting twice whilst it was still the RVS.

Zachrulez · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:38 am

Or 3 times?

You voted me, then yourself, and then the tracker.

Zachrulez · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:43 am

The reason I voted for the tracker was that he changed his vote during RVS for a reason that looked serious to me, which was stated in a way that tried to make it sound not serious.

I don't really like it because it fuels a wagon on jmj, while allowing him to say it's not serious later if others run up jmj for not liking RVS.

farside22 · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:21 am

Haylen wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:Was that your reason?
Heh, see I thought you're voting him because he voted twice in the RVS. Every game anyone's done that (voted twice), they get penalised for it.

I was making a point by voting twice whilst it was still the RVS.

In other news my vote on haylen is now more serious.

Haylen · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:28 am

good good ^.^

I like starting games with a few votes on myself.

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:48 am

Zach wrote: The reason I voted for the tracker was that he changed his vote during RVS for a reason that looked serious to me, which was stated in a way that tried to make it sound not serious.

I didn't even consider the possibility of The Tracker's vote being serious. I don't see how it could be considered serious, considering that anyone who goes against the RVS always gets (random) votes early.

Also, something similar could be said of your vote for The Tracker. It was serious, but stated in a way that didn't make it seem serious.

farside wrote:In other news my vote on haylen is now more serious.

This. It just looks like Haylen was jumping on Zach's Tracker vote as the first serious vote of the game. She's now essentially saying her vote wasn't serious (considering her reasoning implies she doesn't consider making a second vote to be a scumtell). Bandwagoning a serious vote with a mostly non-serious vote. Bad.

Haylen · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:07 am

Lol, wasn't i bandwagoned for non serious stuff earlier? Why are you ignoring that?

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:16 am

You were bandwagoned for non-serious stuff. A random bandwagon.

My problem is that you followed Zach's serious vote on The Tracker with a vote on The Tracker for a null tell. If you hadn't been asked for a reason for your vote, you could very well have latched onto Zach's reasons later on for example.

farside22 · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:20 am

Haylen wrote:Lol, wasn't i bandwagoned for non serious stuff earlier? Why are you ignoring that?

I have to agree with DRK here. The following is horrible and the fact that zach does the vote first and you just follow it up behing him looks opportunist.

Cat · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:03 am

Unvote: jmj3000

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:10 am

@Cat
What do you think of The Tracker and/or Haylen?

Zachrulez · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:53 pm

DeathRowKitty wrote:
Also, something similar could be said of your vote for The Tracker. It was serious, but stated in a way that didn't make it seem serious.

How so?

The Tracker · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:58 pm

No, I disagree. His vote definitely seemed serious enough, but he's using such flimsy reasoning it's cause for suspect.

Haylen...yeah. Pretty much everything's already been said.

Cat · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:38 am

Haylen hasn't been very on-topic, to put it well.

But maybe some off tangent is what we need to get this game started.

farside22 · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:12 pm

Cat wrote:Haylen hasn't been very on-topic, to put it well.

But maybe some off tangent is what we need to get this game started.

So what are your thoughts that make this seem town motiviated?
Why the vote on Jm? Do you think just voting someone without reason and not trying to bring something new helps get the game started?

DeathRowKitty · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:39 pm

Zach wrote:
DRK wrote: Also, something similar could be said of your vote for The Tracker. It was serious, but stated in a way that didn't make it seem serious.
How so?

Your Tracker vote was thrown in at the end of a post that otherwise didn't mention him. Also, the fact that you had to tell us it was a random vote was a bit of a tip-off.