The Sopranos: A Deadly Game (GAME OVER!)

[hohum]

Over? Hardly.

So if the first vote was your "joke vote" and the RVS is "almost over" are you satisfied with your second vote? If so, why?

[Sir Tornado]

vote cjmiller

Am I infringing on your human rights by voting you?

[Kise]

Indeed I am. InHim should be ashamed of himself as well, but with Ash being the last person who joined the bandwagon, I voted for him because he oughtta know better (if he's townie) that you don't needlessly hop on a baseless voting-party.

How long will you stay on Empking's wagon?

[hohum]

I will stay on empking's wagon until I'm ready to get off of it.

Why do you think wagoning people is such a bad thing?

I'd like to point out to you that any special mechanics or power-roles aside, the only thing we have is our vote with which to pressure people. Also note that Empking (being empking) is a highly visible target for pressure votes.

[fuzzylightning]

He also has yet to make a post, as far as I can tell, but the wagon may be a bit out of control right now, seeing as it is only page 3

[Tom]

Also note that Empking (being empking) is a highly visible target for pressure votes.

What do you mean by a visible target? That people will take note what how he reacts to a quick wagon on him? I didn't really get this.

[hohum]

"Out of Control" is a stretch. He's nowhere near lynch.

visible target meaning his he's widely recognized and his play style pisses a lot of people off. It's always a reason to poke him. Some times he drops useful tells some times he doesn't.

[Kise]

Wagoning is bad when it is without merit.

@Tom - Empking is a known minimal-commenting player, so, I take it that hohum wants to toy with him by pressuring Emp into giving a good response(?).

[Kise]

Yup.

[hohum]

Merit is subjective. This early in the game pretty much all votes are baseless. I've seen plenty of early wagons produce useful results though.

[hohum]

Also, can you go into more detail as to why you believe your 2nd vote is so sound? Please quote for relevant context. Would you be happy right now if your vote resulted in a lynch?

[Kise]

with Ash being the last person who joined the bandwagon, I voted for him because he oughtta know better (if he's townie) that you don't needlessly hop on a baseless voting-party.

It may take a bigger case to get Ash lynched, but between him, inHim & yourself, one has to be scum.. I just don't see a townie player hopping onto a now-5-person wagon so nonchalantly. Mafia more than likely would join the party since they can cover up the fact that 4 other people voted for Empking also. And from there, it's a chaotic case of "which one(s) out of the 5 are scum?"

Poro's vote can lightly be taken as an obv-joke vote.. but it's the bandwagon that follows that raises suspicion.

[Locke Lamora]

Vote: Zwet

Because he was about as brief as Empking the last time I've played with him.

[Porochaz]

Wagoning is bad when it is without merit.

How do you suggest we go after scum then?

[elvis_knits]

When do I get to whack someone?

Vote:ZONEFACE

for being trigger happy

Vote: Millar13

for arguing against someone being triggerhappy in a Soprano's game...

So from this we can garner:

MonkeyMan576 is Tony Soprano *bows*.

ZONEACE is the goon of the family, obviously town.

Millar13 is obviously not a part of the family, thus, on the outside, and therefor, scum!

Vote: Millar13

Day 1s are never this easy. Thank you for helping out Millar13!

a clear end to the random phase, from the fact that you have percieved three very random votes for being

"Tells"

. Although, you really can't be accused of anything yet using the word

OBVIOUSLY

on the second page is a course for concern.

vote millar

obviously.

[Dr. Melfi]

Vote Count #1:

"You don't shit where you eat. And you

really

don't shit where I eat." - Tony Soprano

Empking - (CJMiller, Porochaz, inHimshallibe, AshMC1984, hohum)

millar13 - (MonkeyMan576, al_kohaulec, elvis_knits)
ZONEACE - (millar13)
killa seven - (fuzzylightning)
AshMC1984 - (Kise)
CJMiller - (Sir Tornado)
zwetschenwasser - (Locke Lamora)

With 22 alive, it takes 12 to lynch.

[Porochaz]

Mod is it possible to get the number of people voting for each person by the name?

[inHimshallibe]

I need to play more games with hohum.

@Kise: I should know better? What's that supposed to mean in this context?

[al_kohaulec]

He also has yet to make a post, as far as I can tell, but the wagon may be a bit out of control right now, seeing as it is only page 3

It's a slight of an exaggeration to say the bandwagon is out of control. If it went to where he was at L-3, that would be way out of control, but that happening in the RVS, makes less so of an out of control bandwagon.

Mod is it possible to get the number of people voting for each person by the name?

Seconded.

[inHimshallibe]

And it's quite laughable to say any bandwagon is "out of control" - players are quite aware of what they are doing.

Either say it's scummy or don't. Letting others do the work for you is scummy.

unvote
vote: fuzzylightning

[Empking]

I need to play more games with hohum.

Why?

[fuzzylightning]

It didn't seem scummy at the time, otherwise I would have called it scummy. I had forgotten how many people there were in this game and I thought he was closer to a lynch that he turned out to really be, therefore I retract my statement.

I was not letting anyone else do any work for me, I was just making a comment about what I perceived to be the case but it turns out that I was mistaken.

[hohum]

what part of "large theme" makes it unclear that there's a boatload of people in this game?

"Oh I see your point" would have been a better way to save face.

[fuzzylightning]

well, the last large theme i was in only had 15 people, and that would make 5 votes closer to lynch than the 22 in this one.

[millar13]

Too busy reading the complications of the role, and talking to your partners and who who you want out to read all the info fuzzy?