2 - Gorrad (JDodge, Yosarian2)
1 - Yosarian2 (Kaleidoscope)
1 - JDodge (Gorrad)
1 - Kaleidoscope (Jack)
not voting: Erg0, Patrick, Sarcastro, Zindaras
With 9 alive it is 5 to lynch!
Deadline is Aug 22
PRODS being issued to: Sarcastro
Wrong on basically ever level there. I explained why I am voting for you, and it has nothing to do with "following JDodge for the sake of bandwagoning". The fact that JDodge voted you before I did does make me feel better about him, as it makes me think he's seeing the same stuff I'm seeing here, but I was going to vote for you anyway.Gorrad wrote:And yet when JDodge votes, you follow for the sake of bandwagoning. Post 457 not only has you voting JDodge, but you insult K-scope for voting someone who Jdodge didn't.
I haven't. I've said what I think about the rampant bandwagoning of this game (it's stupid). I've argued against some of the lynches we've had. See my early-game debate with Yosarian.Gorrad wrote:Zind, you keep asking questions questions questions. What do YOU think of the bandwagoning strategy, and why does it feel you've avoided the topic?
Oh, wow, after 6 days, we've finally managed to randomlynch scum. Good job, man, good job. I'm sure the poets will sing of our deeds for ages to come.JDodge wrote:It works.
Vote: Jack
Mass wagoning? Not counting wagons I joined late for the stratigic reasons I explained earlier, there are 3 wagons I actually pushed for so far, Undo's, Battle Mage's, and Gorrad's. I was right about 1/3 of them. Not a great ratio, perhaps, but it's better then your voting record so far this game.Zindaras wrote: Yosarian is not being as intelligent as I'd expect him to be, with his mass 'wagoning and whatnot. He could very well just be going with the flow because he can get away with it. I still dislike his faulty push for BM.
Well, of course that day was the first time I attacked him. Didn't you read my posts? If I was trying to lynch BM the day before, I would certanly not attack Gorrad in the same day. That would be bad stratagy, and in fact was one of the scumtells I used to catch Gorrad with. When I attack someone, it's because I intend to get them lynched, that day. Otherwise, I wouldn't. Now, if I try and am unable to get them lynched, that's a different story, but I would not want to even "mention Gorrad by name" in any context, positive or negitive, unless and until I thought he was the best lynch candidate for that day or unless I had some other pressing reason to do so.Zindaras wrote:The first time you even mention Gorrad by name is the post you vote him. .
Isn't your question here based on complete and utter WIFOM?Zinderas wrote: Give me one reason to assume you weren't bussing him that isnotbased on complete and utter WIFOM.
I complained about people starting stupid wagons based on nothing. That dosn't mean I'm not going to start a wagon when I see a case; in fact, I feel like I need to wagon early as that's honestly the only way I feel like I can know the wagon's not being led by scum.Your posts conflict. You complain about people being utterly stupid, yet you happily join wagons yourself.
You are wrong there, but I can't really blame you for that, because I still can't say why I pushed BM. That being said, I'm still not going to explain that any farther.You pushed BM on nothing.Nothing.
It wasn't just the first time you attacked him, I could've lived with that. No, it was the first time you even mentioned him.Yosarian2 wrote:Well, of course that day was the first time I attacked him. Didn't you read my posts? If I was trying to lynch BM the day before, I would certanly not attack Gorrad in the same day. That would be bad stratagy, and in fact was one of the scumtells I used to catch Gorrad with. When I attack someone, it's because I intend to get them lynched, that day. Otherwise, I wouldn't. Now, if I try and am unable to get them lynched, that's a different story, but I would not want to even "mention Gorrad by name" in any context, positive or negitive, unless and until I thought he was the best lynch candidate for that day or unless I had some other pressing reason to do so.
I'm not saying your vote on Gorrad makes you scum. I'm saying that your vote on Gorrad does not make you town.Isn't your question here based on complete and utter WIFOM?
I helped lynch a scum who, arguably at least, probably not have been lynched if I hadn't supported the bandwagon and then laid out my case against him. Obveously when you catch a scum you can never prove you weren't bussing them, but I must say I'm surprised that your arguments here seem totally unchanged by Gorrad's alignment. I attacked him, and I was right, and if you really want to call that scummy then you're the one who's gone too far around the WIFOM bend here.