StrangerCoug's Worst Nightmare: D├®j├á Bastard (Game over!)

[ZazieR]

unvote: Tjoe min ja; Vote: Datadanne

bandwagon l-1 vote? when rai seems scum 2 u?

not l-1... misread the 9 as 5

Wouldn't cater's vote have been the hammer vote then?

[ZazieR]

I will vote when I get my role PM.

Why?

[ZazieR]

Demanding an information lynch like this actually stifles discussion - new voters for Jordan have an excuse of "I just did it for information", and we get less scumhunting elsewhere.

Why didn't you say this when something like this happened?

[ZazieR]

Seeing as rereading is for chumps, I have decided not to.

It's not ._.
Due to not reading what you've missed, you'll miss a lot of info.

[ZazieR]

I'd lynch SP for this comment too.

He still thinks Mufasa is scum? I can guarantee Mufasa is town.

How can you guarantee it? Do you have any proof?

Fishing.

[ZazieR]

I'd lynch SP for this comment too.

He still thinks Mufasa is scum? I can guarantee Mufasa is town.

The only way you can guarantee it is if you are scum, and even then there is still a chance you could be wrongs. So wait... No.... you can't guarantee it, even if you are scum.

This post screams scum.

[ZazieR]

Why, uh, is Cateraction hopping on the Data reaction? All I see of his reasons are 'he looks like scum to me'. But it seems more like, 'oh look guys there is someone else please vote him not me'.

Can you elaborate on this?

[ZazieR]

Ok, people. I'm back.

Sociopath - Don't understand his stance on Llama. Please explain.

No thanks.

??

Why you don't want to explain?

Forgot to remind

Socio

of this.

[ZazieR]

So far, based on what has happened on this page, Bogre is scum. Feel free to ask me why though it don't know if it's important to either warrant a vote or be a point of contention.

Elaborate why and why you don't know if it warrants a vote, when you think he's scum due to his post.

[ZazieR]

I recommend an iso read of Raivann to other players.

I second the notion, Iso read of Bogre not a bad idea either.

Why Bogre?

[ZazieR]

Vote: Bogre

A read in iso seems to ring, ring with scum intentions.

Care to elaborate?

[ZazieR]

Also, some players (Like CC and Raivann) should look at my first row of posts to look for posts aimed at them.

[SocioPath]

Ok, people. I'm back.

Sociopath - Don't understand his stance on Llama. Please explain.

No thanks.

??

Why you don't want to explain?

Forgot to remind

Socio

of this.

No thanks.

[ZazieR]

Then at least state why you don't want to explain.

[SocioPath]

Then at least state why you don't want to explain.

No thanks.

[Col.Cathart]

Zaz - And since when voting for pressure is a bad thing?

Then at least state why you don't want to explain.

No thanks.

Claim: Day Vig

Explain, or I'm going to shoot you for being deliberately anti-town.

[ZazieR]

Zaz - And since when voting for pressure is a bad thing?

It's not. But when players state it's for pressure with their vote, it comes across as fake to me.

[Col.Cathart]

It's not. But when players state it's for pressure with their vote, it comes across as fake to me.

On the other hand, it instantly counters any 'why vote on XXX?' questions, so IMO it's very handy.

[ZazieR]

It's not. But when players state it's for pressure with their vote, it comes across as fake to me.

On the other hand, it instantly counters any 'why vote on XXX?' questions, so IMO it's very handy.

Though the one who you want to pressure knows then why you're voting him, which will then destroy the purpose of the vote.

[SocioPath]

Zaz - And since when voting for pressure is a bad thing?

Then at least state why you don't want to explain.

No thanks.

Claim: Day Vig

Explain, or I'm going to shoot you for being deliberately anti-town.

No thanks.

So then pull the trigger, cowboy.

[Col.Cathart]

Fair enough...

Kill: SocioPath

[ZazieR]

Zaz - And since when voting for pressure is a bad thing?

Then at least state why you don't want to explain.

No thanks.

Claim: Day Vig

Explain, or I'm going to shoot you for being deliberately anti-town.

No thanks.

So then pull the trigger, cowboy.

This is the worst post ever.

[ZazieR]

Fair enough...

Kill: SocioPath

And you need to explain why you didn't use this threat against Data.

[Fishythefish]

Demanding an information lynch like this actually stifles discussion - new voters for Jordan have an excuse of "I just did it for information", and we get less scumhunting elsewhere.

Why didn't you say this when something like this happened?

When were you thinking of, in particular?


Someone asked for a summary of the case on Raivann. Here is how I see it:
- Lack of useful contributions throughout the game, while maintaining activity.
- Lyncher speculation to support an unvote (of Data) - this is a bad excuse to do anything.
- When attacked by cateraction, OMGUS reaction. Later supports it with "we should lynch cater for information".
- Further OMGUS reactions against SP and myself.
- Terrible case joining people with links that are tenuous at best, with little or no thought for individual scumminess. This case is so bad I can't believe it is a genuine attempt at scumhunting.

The cases on me about flip flopping and wagon hopping are lame.
I've been playing the game and posting alot so of course there is gonna be more to accuse me of.
I explained my stance on Tjoe. I think we can all agree that Mufasa did look scummy. And I haven't moved off Jordan/cat.
Talk about weak arguments. So if i stay on Jordan Im tunneling, I move off of Tjoe i'm flip flopping.
Weak sauce.

You never explained you stance on Tjoe. Nobody has actually said you are tunnelling on Jordan (or anyone else), so that is a total strawman. (If I'm wrong about either of those, please correct me). I have said you are making terrible arguments, but that is a different matter.

[Col.Cathart]

I would, if he would post some more bullshit. Instead he posted absolutely nothing.

But hey, it doesn't end the day, so I'll lynch him gladly anyway.