DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE LACTOSE INTOLERANT
THIS POST BLASTS A LOT OF SWISS CHEESE
Shotty to the Body wrote:Nice try, you can only play that card so many times DGB. When I flip town who will be your roleblocker next?
Yeah, it's not like my search for my roleblocker got us to lynch a townie, we hit the freakin' godfather.
Shotty to the Body wrote:I unvoted Zwet because I his lynch, though acceptable, was pure policy and I actually felt fuzzy was scummy.
OK, so it's an acceptable lynch, but it's pure policy, and yet fuzzy scummy? You claim to be a lyncher, and you decide to shy away from the world's most easily-gotten-away-with wagon to what, save zwet's miserable, worthless life???? Like your being off the wagon was going to hold off the lynch of a totally useless player? And for that, you were willing to let your WIN CON escape you? A 1/27 chance of losing the game even though zwet was going to be lynched no matter what???
Shotty to the Body wrote:Scum-hunting was more important to me than a 1/27 (less than 4%!) chance Zwet might be the person I was looking for.
You haven't exactly been a paragon of scum hunting, so I call BS. If you're a lyncher, you're not scum hunting, what do care about scum hunting? You're on the right guy's lynch and you win the game.
Shotty to the Body wrote:Also if you need a breadcrumb you can look at my ISO 63 I hinted that I was annoyed that Xemnas was NK'd.
I did just look. Maybe it's a breadcrumb, maybe it isn't. It's possible that you're a third-party, or that you are the remaining red scum, if your wincon is truly to be on the blue GF lynch. I don't buy it either way.
Shotty to the Body wrote:DGB offered Ace up (who everyone thought was scummy before she really started pushing the wagon)
Oh really. You think I'd want to end this game alone after bus'ing two buddies, including the Godfather, while I'm a roleblocked miller??? Ace wasn't the lynch yesterday, there were a lot of distractions, but I wasn't going to let him get away with it. Plus, he's one of the mafiates that's on the team that had two remaining members left. If he wasn't my roleblocker, he knew who was. Which reminds me. I have to go and fish who his buddy may be.
Shotty to the Body wrote:She threw us the bone that UK was action-less to prove herself
Sounds to me like to BELIEVE it - and you believe it because you are scum. You just said that I proved myself when I said that UKitten was action-less, and got it correct. It's too late in the game for you to lie that UKitten and myself are scums in cahoots, because there are two ISOLATED scums left.
Shotty to the Body wrote:Now she's presenting these ridiculous theories about how it's 'balancing' for scum to have a greater incentive to go after other scum. None of theN apparently had such an ability, look at the role-names. If that was the case why wouldn't it be mirrored if it was for balance?
Yeah well you just changed your story from "I get a special power when I'm on Gorrad's lynch" to "I'm a
third-party
townie lyncher." Scuse me for getting all your lies confused.
Shotty to the Body wrote:On top of that why would mafia power be based on voting? Mafia powers are based around KILLING because that's what mafia have control over.
Makes no sense. Also, one scum was a claim killer so I expect more weird stuff.
Shotty to the Body wrote:The only Heartless left (exploded flavor) is the one that killed Gorrad so s/he would already have gained from such a power if s/he had to kill Gorrad. It makes little sense for mafia to have to get a lynch on someone and it makes less sense such an ability would be used and not mirrored on both scum teams if the mod was trying to balance the Godfathers.
Maybe it is, I certainly don't know.
Shotty to the Body wrote:TL;DR:: DGB is bullshitting theories that don't even make sense out of her ass without providing much in way of actual content.
You're sounding exactly like ace54839, it must be the latest scum fashion.