959: Malth's Alternate Reality: Game Over

[Fate]

N1 death counter as mason: 3/3

[CJMiller]

Vote: llamaeatataco

L-2 now love.

[NavyCherub]

I agree with Jack at the moment.

[Jack]

Kill:CJMiller

[UncertainKitten]

Wait...what Navy? You just...wait, you are voting llama IIRC, but...you agree that llama isn't scummy? Or with Jack voting you?

[NavyCherub]

I'm not voting for llama right now, and I agree don't think he's scum.

[UncertainKitten]

Oops! You and Cobalt posted close to the same time, so I scrolled to fast and saw your avi with a vote llama ^-^;.

Ok.

[jasonT1981]

I am really sorry to do this, But I have asked to replace out, , I found out I am going back into hospital for more rehab as a spot opened up and was offered to me and have the option of a possible small surgery. So after considering things, I doubt I will be of much use to anyone in this game with the amount of time I will either be in hospital, travellling to and from hospital or doped up on painkillers. I have informed the mod.

Again, I am sorry.

[CJMiller]

Policy lynch jasonT1981 then?

[SocioPath]

But, excuse me if I haven't seen llamaeattaco ever have the Doublevoter with ADHD role and spent the entire time voting two of the three scum ^-^.

You know, I HAVE done more than just that.

If you want the most recent accessible sample where town loses because they didn't listen to me, try This One where I replace into it, read the game, and state 100% of the scum in the game, tying together the 2 scums, and also separating the third scum, which was the SK, before any SK kills even showed up.

...and then got killed because I was assumed to be a power role.

Appeal to THAT authority.

[NavyCherub]

Policy lynch? Do you plan on contributing more often any time soon, CJ? It isn't day one anymore you know.

[xvart]

Policy lynch jasonT1981 then?

And what is the

policy

?

FoS: CJMiller

xvart.

[Twomz]

Vote: CJMiller

While it might be acceptable at endgame where expecting someone to come in and read dozens of pages of text is borderline retarded, we're at day 2, just let someone replace in.

[llamaeatataco]

Interesting, SP and UK have started the day with voting me, and I still haven't seen much of a reason. Other than using words in ways they haven't thought of before, that is. I might have missed it, so if you could point me to where you found a valid reason to lynch me, I might consider you being town.

@SP:
I will admit that you may have had success in the past, this kind of works against you. From my point of view, if you have such a high success rate as town you are more likely to be mafia seeing as you are tunneling on a townie (me). This doesn't help the rest of the town in reading you, but that's beside the point. From what I can see you haven't helped the town at all, you've just spent your entire time focusing on me and not really saying much of anything. I refer again to my list of your posts. I still agree with how I classified them, and there were but a handful of useful ones among all of the chaff.


@UK: I'll give you a hint: If your mouse has a scroll wheel on it, hold control and scroll up. That should zoom in to somewhere closer to normal magnification, because you obviously have it zoomed out to far if you can't read quotes. Or you could just go to an optometrist and see if you're farsighted. I for one have no problem reading quotes, and apparently the majority of the people on MS don't either.


also, ad homs are fine as long as they are being used in an argument that isn't game related as far as I'm concerned.

UK wrote:

I still am assessing his alignment, but I expect some things from him that will likely be revealed in the future.

Why are you defending him so much then? Are you that worried that your scumbuddy will fail you? You've answered about as many of my points about him as he has. If you aren't sure of his alignment, then let him answer for himself instead of helping him out.


@CJmiller: It's a good thing you're not blindly sheeping and

still not producing any useful content or helping to hunt scum at all

. Right?

Oh yeah, and I would quote xvart for truth, but UK would complain. There is no policy for lynching people who need to replace out. I was half expecting Jason to be replaced anyway.



Yeah, at this point I have more hate for sociopath and UK, but CJmiller is just being downright suspicious. Activelurking d1, hopping on the first wagon to appear on d2

for no good reason

and then suggesting we lynch a person, again, for no reason, while still not contributing content. (holy crap, that's a grammar nightmare!)

vote: cjmiller

[Cobalt]

twomz and llama are hopping on the easy target counterwagon

[NavyCherub]

Why are you defending him so much then? Are you that worried that your scumbuddy will fail you?

Why are you allowed to make negative suggestions about the truth behind posts, but you chastised me for it?

[llamaeatataco]

O rly? It's a scummy thing now to try to lynch scummy people? I find it funny that you try to discredit the wagon without even mentioning the sound reasoning behind it. You just say that it's obviously fake and a scum move because I happen to have people voting for me. Fail less please?

[llamaeatataco]

@Navy: I was asking a question, not stating that that was exactly the meaning.

[NavyCherub]

You honestly think there is a difference between posting exactly what you think and posting rhetorical questions that obviously can't be answered, except that the second method is simply avoiding the matter? And does that mean you think that SP's post...

llama, who is your scum partner?
Pitt, who is YOUR scum partner?

is good because they are questions rather than accusations?

[Jack]

I'm feeling a bit like twomz is scum right now.

unvote, vote:twomz

[llamaeatataco]

@Navy: Here's the difference: I was suggesting that as a possibility, you were stating that as a fact. In my mind, if things change, I could view UK as merely trying to help me understand SP's playstyle better. That's not what I think at the moment, at the moment I think she's defending him, potentially meaning they are scum together.

@Jack: Why so?

The only thing I could come up with making him suspicious would be him trying to save JT from a lynch. It might also be him jumping on a wagon that seems easy, but why would scum jump on an easy scum wagon?

[UncertainKitten]

Again, what advantage would it do me to defend a scumbuddy so obviously?

[llamaeatataco]

That's why I'm not voting you instead of CJ. However, I've done absolutely stupid things as mafia and gotten away with it with that defense...

[UncertainKitten]

CJ seems pretty VI right now. But possibly town. I still think he should die, but preferably by way of vig, if we have one.

as for stupid things as mafia, hard to argue that. But it's not the best argument.

[Twomz]

I'm feeling a bit like twomz is scum right now.

unvote, vote:twomz

I get that sometimes, any particular reasons?

And I seem to be missing something on the votes for llama, must have something to do with my eyes glazing over on walls of text.

But, even with jason getting replaced, there needs to be more activity in thread for the beginning of a day, seems like some people have stacked positions and are just gonna let their votes stick there (me included until something better comes along) and others are just waiting for something to happen.

If we're going to just wait for the replacement to come in, we should at least try to get some info out there so he/she can be somewhat productive after his/her thread read.

Without any other info besides the two dead (possible historical/fictional(if you insist on it) character and a character from a movie) I'd say that a genre claim couldn't possibly hurt, but could only help by restricting possible fake claims later in the game. It would, however, get people talking about something (at the very least arguing against it).