Farside!
In post 414, farside22 wrote: In post 277, RachMarie wrote:Yeah tell me about it I am not even sure who has not posted yet? I need something from everyone before I can start sorting some of the slots out bah
This reads scummy to me.
In post 292, FourTrouble wrote:Nah, we need votes on Ankamius. Even assuming
119 is okay (it's not), there's still been lots of stuff to talk about since the game "start," so the RVS vote, lack of scumhunting, and fluffy commentary is by far the worst, scummiest thing here.
Thought on rach would be lovely.
In post 419, farside22 wrote:Xombie: why did you focus only on comments about you? And when you believed ms was faking a read why didn't you vote for him right then?
Vote: rach
From a low level perspective at least, there is continuity here.
In post 513, farside22 wrote: In post 505, RachMarie wrote:Those of you who are already town reading me could you explain WHY?
Bit is actually better at being scum than town. Do not let the VI routine fool you.
Of the 3 votes on me his seems the scummiest. No reasoning giving just a bald vote after two votes have already been cast. It looks like he is going for low hanging fruit.
VOTE: Bit
You are not low hanging fruit.
Why did you focus only on those that voted you?
So here's the first sign of umbrage.
In post 521, farside22 wrote:Imp: Why did you not mention this concern of yours sooner?
As for the discussion about xombie, I thought he was a newb to mafia, which was why I felt his reaction was more questionable. Most newbs as far as I have run across are aware of gambits like that.
It occurs to me that I thought this post was weird when I first read it and I noted that in my catchup yet I still don't feel satisfied about it.
In post 599, farside22 wrote: In post 547, RachMarie wrote:Thanks Tammy especially since you often see me as scummy that makes more sense on you and Nacho, so yeah you can go in my likely town pile And that jives with what I know about Nacho who does tend to read me as town generally.
Still want to know from SW (fery and falcon) about why their early town read on me.
Farside I did not say everyone voting me was scum, I was basing my read and vote on the WAY that Bit joined the wagon, and the fact that peeps were brushing him off as town and VI. I have seen him pull some pretty good stunts as scum before and even 3rd party.
I didn't say you thought that.
I asked why you focused only on that that voted for you.
Continuity.
In post 601, farside22 wrote: In post 587, Xombie wrote:
Just trying to keep up.
What do you think of the people asking for summaries and/or not reading at all?
In post 419, farside22 wrote: And when you believed ms was faking a read why didn't you vote for him right then?
Idk man, can you type like this:
People are lazy, it's null that players don't want to read and ask for summaries.
Vote: xombie
That response does not awnser my question at all.
I'm also a bit paranoid about vezo. I don't recall him analysising post like he did and I think that his current post is the most town I've ever seen him. I'll put that under paranoid for now.
I think responding to Xombie's flippancy with a vote is town. Were this, say, a calculated attempt to get him to break and act scummy, his response should indicate he's not the type to succumb to pressure easily. Not that I believe most scum players do things like that.
In post 1010, farside22 wrote:
As weird as it sounds I find it scummy he responded to the pt before posting in this thread.
My reason for this may seem odd though.
I had house as a loose town read. The play here reminded me of duck tales mafia.
Changed? Not really. It takes me something odd or flips to change reads on day 1.
I haven't attempted to promote his lynch mostly because no one is really that chatty in the pt.
On first read, I think I liked this for the out of the box reasoning, but in retrospect, I dislike the awareness of it and repetition of the point that it will sound odd.
For some reason I am having trouble caring about this iso.
In post 1148, farside22 wrote:
In post 1114, theaceofspades wrote:i get snippy. i'm a snippy person. I felt it was a bit of a reach. Yes plural.
and i been busy. so i haven't posted, hopefully i can fix that.
idk what "you have people talking about AP " but for me it was mostly about 1058. Plus i totally disagree with his reads on farside and MS. And i don't really see how he could have those opinions
Ooba asked the say question. He is not a newb. The wording caught his eye,so your response being primary towards the newb making it read very demeaning towards him.
So you have one post from ap you don't like?
That's it?
Yea I'm not moving my vote.
Ap: I think it was that I didn't make a list. Sometimes I make list, sometimes I don't. I don't really explain town reads unless someone finds them scummy.
I feel like farside was the first person to point out how little sense ace's ap read has made
btw that still doesn't make sense to me and I would like an explanation
Farside doesn't seem to be overflowing with townreads, but the ones she does have, such as myself, are handled properly. She has an issue with ace? Asks a townread for an opinion. That's consistent with the townread being real.
In post 1615, farside22 wrote:
I'm thinking but I still have this itch about spade. Granted rach' vote and reason is God awful and Pere just jumped on without a word makes my skin crawl.
That all said I need original thought coming from spade to switch off.
this is a good post mostly, though it would give me hives if ace flipped scum
blah blah consistent stances blah. doesn't back down given attempted appeasement blah.
In post 1906, farside22 wrote: In post 1901, Solar Wind wrote:@ Farside, can you elaborate on your Rach suspicion? You say that she is scum partly for pushing Ace on the neighborhoods plural post that Ace made. But you had pushed him on the same grounds so why does it make Rach scum?
I did notable the same ducking case or reason at all.
It's like you did not even read my case at all
In post 1928, farside22 wrote:Alright vezo and cephrir, I'll get off my box for now but consider me not happy with rach or her "case"
Vote: ace
actually taking townreads' opinions into account
I am mislynchable despite openly having a strong role, so why go to this trouble? Unless you want to argue it intentionally was bad, but it only could have been so from someone aware of my meta which she really isn't
In post 2565, farside22 wrote:I also explained my rach scum read and I still feel she's not scum hunting or progressing reads.
The case she made was nothing like mine and I'm sick of solar saying it is.
Farside pretty routinely gets upset by the same thing (lacking original thought and not digging in) which I think is town. As opposed to wanting to have all kinds of different flashy reasons to look super proactive.
Overall I think this exercise cooled my townread a bit and furthermore was extremely boring for some reason