Scummies 2008 Nominations! (Deadline: 1/15)

[Gimbo]

Nominate: The Town of Mini 608

Award: Best Performance by a Team ("Goodfellas")

Game: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=350

This was a swift game modded by XreyoX, and therefore we only had 60 days. Surprisingly, we did an excellent job and got the Godfather Day 1, the SK Day 2, and the other two Mafia Goons Day 3 and 4. To me, the game seemed somewhat challenging for town, I'm glad we pulled it through.

I second

[Adel]

self noms are frowned upon. Gimbo [Mason] and skitzer [Townie] were both in the team that won Mini 608.

I'm sure you guys are proud of your win, but remember that a game ends almost every single here.

your town happened to have cop+doc+masons+vig vs. godfather+RB+goon vs SK which is totally balanced in the town's favor.

[Kinetic]

Nom: Mr.Stoofer

for

Best Flavor

for Space Monkeys 2.

I was reading the game on a whim out of boredom and I just kept falling over in my chair laughing at Stoofer's posts. Eventually I just decided screw the game, and read just Stoofer's posts in isolation. I have never had so much fun reading a game before. Here are some of the more brilliant posts:

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... c&&start=0

Post #13
Post #20
Post #24 (I couldn't stop laughing at the absurdity of this one)
Post #33
Posts #39,40 (ROFL)

It seemed like this dropped off a bit at the end of the game, but I thought it was awesome.

[Thesp]

Nomination for Best Performance by an Individual (Pro-Town):

Glork

, for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno. He picked up on several people being scum (including myself) out of the blue,

sua sponte

.

Nomination for Most Enjoyable Game (Large):

Mr. Grey

for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno.

[Niv]

Nomination for Best Performance by an Individual (Pro-Town):

Glork

, for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno. He picked up on several people being scum (including myself) out of the blue,

sua sponte

.

Nomination for Most Enjoyable Game (Large):

Mr. Grey

for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno.

Fully second.

Also, Nominate Mr. Grey for best setup as well

[Rogueben]

Nomination for Best Performance by an Individual (Pro-Town): Glork, for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno. He picked up on several people being scum (including myself) out of the blue, sua sponte.

/Third. He called 4 out of the 5 mafia.

Nomination for Most Enjoyable Game (Large): Mr. Grey for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno.

/Third. Thoroughly enjoyable game, kept pace really well. Moderated to perfection.

[DrippingGoofball]

Nom: Mr.Stoofer

for

Best Flavor

for Space Monkeys 2.

I was reading the game on a whim out of boredom and I just kept falling over in my chair laughing at Stoofer's posts. Eventually I just decided screw the game, and read just Stoofer's posts in isolation. I have never had so much fun reading a game before. Here are some of the more brilliant posts:

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... c&&start=0

Post #13
Post #20
Post #24 (I couldn't stop laughing at the absurdity of this one)
Post #33
Posts #39,40 (ROFL)

It seemed like this dropped off a bit at the end of the game, but I thought it was awesome.

/seconded enthusiastically.

[Thestatusquo]

I'd like to nominate:

the fonz

for

"best performance, town"

For literally breaking the setup in open 82, texas justice.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=100

[Oman]

Second

Very well done.

[petroleumjelly]

Ha, that is indeed pretty sweet.

But I think it might be more appropriate to nominate it for a

Professor Mafia

Award; I would think the "Best Pro-Town Performance" would be somebody who was just nailing scum left and right, whereas "Professor Mafia" is taking a set-up in isolation and analyzing it, or commenting on strategies.

[Thestatusquo]

I've always kind of thought of the professor Mafia being sort of an award for discussion contributions to mafia, and the best performance for in game accomplishments. To me, then, fonzes effort looks better for best performance to me.

Especially since it's not any kind of contribution to relevant theory, as he's assured that setup will never be run again.

[Thestatusquo]

We could even nominate it for both, and see which one the judges think should stick. :-p No need to be stingy if a non fits two categories.

[Oman]

I'm with TSQ. Prof. Mafia is if he broke it outside the game

[gorckat]

I'd like to nominate:

the fonz

for

"best performance, town"

For literally breaking the setup in open 82, texas justice.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=100

Wow.

Third

for best performance and

nth

for Professor Mafia.

[PokerFace]

I just got around to checking this thread after reading said game.

I'd like to nominate:

the fonz

for

"best performance, town"

For literally breaking the setup in open 82, texas justice.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=100

Wow.

Third

for best performance and

nth

for Professor Mafia.

Upon further review, I endorse this product and/or service.

nth both!

Edit: If I had to pick just one I personally think he would deserve the professor one more since I do believe he said something to the equivalent of joining the game in order to test said gamebreaking idea, but either way his performances/contrabutions should not be ignored easily.

[Gaspar]

Nomination for Best Performance by an Individual (Pro-Town):

Glork

, for California Trilogy 2: Dantes in Fresno. He picked up on several people being scum (including myself) out of the blue,

sua sponte

.

I object.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I just got around to checking this thread after reading said game.

I'd like to nominate:

the fonz

for

"best performance, town"

For literally breaking the setup in open 82, texas justice.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=100

Wow.

Third

for best performance and

nth

for Professor Mafia.

Upon further review, I endorse this product and/or service.

nth both!

Edit: If I had to pick just one I personally think he would deserve the professor one more since I do believe he said something to the equivalent of joining the game in order to test said gamebreaking idea, but either way his performances/contrabutions should not be ignored easily.

Not to be a sour puss, but...

You guys do realize that this Texas Justice has already been broken, right? The Fonz's game-breaking strategy was just a variation on the original strategy that mathcam created in the first Texas Justice mafia. It's not really anything new to see someone break this setup. I'd support best performance, but I don't think Professor Mafia fits the bill, since he didn't contribute anything new.

[Farkshinsoup]

I'd like to suggest a new category: Best IC.

To recognize the players that donate their time and MS energy to newbies and newbie games.

I think that it takes a lot of patience and skill to impart reliable and useful information to new players within an environment where paranoia and suspicion are endemic. The best ones also play the game well while they're doing it.

[gorckat]

Second: Best IC category

[Thestatusquo]

Second:

third Best IC category

[PokerFace]

I just got around to checking this thread after reading said game.

I'd like to nominate:

the fonz

for

"best performance, town"

For literally breaking the setup in open 82, texas justice.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=100

Wow.

Third

for best performance and

nth

for Professor Mafia.

Upon further review, I endorse this product and/or service.

nth both!

Edit: If I had to pick just one I personally think he would deserve the professor one more since I do believe he said something to the equivalent of joining the game in order to test said gamebreaking idea, but either way his performances/contrabutions should not be ignored easily.

Not to be a sour puss, but...

You guys do realize that this Texas Justice has already been broken, right? The Fonz's game-breaking strategy was just a variation on the original strategy that mathcam created in the first Texas Justice mafia. It's not really anything new to see someone break this setup. I'd support best performance, but I don't think Professor Mafia fits the bill, since he didn't contribute anything new.

Really? I didn't know that. Can I see a link to what mathcam did?

[farside22]

Fourth: Best IC category

[Thestatusquo]

A relevant question would then become "is the IC award for qualitative play or for quantitative play"

I'm not sure which is the better one to re-enforce.

[hasdgfas]

A relevant question would then become "is the IC award for qualitative play or for quantitative play"

I'm not sure which is the better one to re-enforce.

I'm pretty sure that the judges could use a combination of both, in addition to how helpful they are for the newbies. I don't think it should be either qualitative play or quantitative play, as neither is really what the ICs are for. They're there to help the newbies, in addition to playing with them, so a combination of all three is probably the best way of deciding.

[Thok]

I'd like to suggest a new category: Best IC.

To recognize the players that donate their time and MS energy to newbies and newbie games.

I think that it takes a lot of patience and skill to impart reliable and useful information to new players within an environment where paranoia and suspicion are endemic. The best ones also play the game well while they're doing it.

We've had this in the past. The problem is that nobody was sure who deserved to be nominated for it.