Fritz's Fav Fictional Figures Faction Fest - Game over

[Cephrir]

What the heck. I swear, every single time I get lynched, it's for no apparent reason/without a case. It's really annoying. I guess all I can say is that some people really need to recalibrate their scumdars.

[Cephrir]

EBWODP: Reading my post, I realize it sounds like I think I've been lynched, but I am aware that I haven't been. Feel free to replace "lynched" with "wagoned".

[curiouskarmadog]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I'll give you a list of my suspects later, but don't expect any comments on them. I play by gut mostly, otherwise I would

continuesly ask for a BM lynch

.[/quote]
I absolutely agree with you there

will

unvote

for now...awaiting your "suspects"

[JDodge]

What the heck. I swear, every single time I get lynched, it's for no apparent reason/without a case. It's really annoying. I guess all I can say is that some people really need to recalibrate their scumdars.

Whining only makes me happier with my vote

[ibaesha]

I don't have time to catch up to the last 6 pages or so that have popped up right now. Work and life are catching up to me and I'm in serious need of sleep.

[Thin_Man]

What the heck. I swear, every single time I get lynched, it's for no apparent reason/without a case. It's really annoying. I guess all I can say is that some people really need to recalibrate their scumdars.

And every other time you seem to just sigh about it and not really put up much of a fight. Don't think I've ever seen you whine about it before.

[Glork]

I think we'd be more productive lynching Sarcastro or Glork at this point. Probably more Sarcastro, but either way we could make a lynch today that would provide useful information, unlike that Day 1 lynch.

Okay, I'll bite. Why would a lynch on each of us provide significant useful information?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

After reread, I don't like UA, Glork and Ibaesha.

[Sarcastro]

I think we'd be more productive lynching Sarcastro or Glork at this point. Probably more Sarcastro, but either way we could make a lynch today that would provide useful information, unlike that Day 1 lynch.

Lynching Sarc is never productive.

I'm kind of ambivalent about lynching Glork. I'd rather lynch Cephrirscum, though.

[BrianMcQueso]

I think we'd be more productive lynching Sarcastro or Glork at this point. Probably more Sarcastro, but either way we could make a lynch today that would provide useful information, unlike that Day 1 lynch.

Okay, I'll bite. Why would a lynch on each of us provide significant useful information?

Because you have discussion. Because people have opinions about you two. Because I'd rather lynch someone that we've talked about instead of another quick bandwagon that will leave us equally informationless on Day 3.

Unless you think quicklynching Cephrir is the better play. *shrug*

[Thin_Man]

I think we'd be more productive lynching Sarcastro or Glork at this point. Probably more Sarcastro, but either way we could make a lynch today that would provide useful information, unlike that Day 1 lynch.

Okay, I'll bite. Why would a lynch on each of us provide significant useful information?

Because you have discussion. Because people have opinions about you two. Because I'd rather lynch someone that we've talked about instead of another quick bandwagon that will leave us equally informationless on Day 3.

Unless you think quicklynching Cephrir is the better play. *shrug*

So you're planning to start catching scum tomorrow then?

[Glork]

That's brilliant, BMQ. Lynch the people who are actually trying to produce something and let the scums lurk their way through the game.

[Glork]

EBWOP: And no, I'm not advocating a Cephrir lynch right now. I'm not even sure why he's being strung up. I'd like to put some pressure on some of the people who are just wagoning relentlessly and/or are stating things without choosing to back them up at all. *eyes KScope*

[BrianMcQueso]

That's brilliant, BMQ. Lynch the people who are actually trying to produce something and let the scums lurk their way through the game.

And you wonder why I'm so good at this game.

[Glork]

I'm trying to decide if that's a cue to pull the Paragon card here or not. <.<


Seriously, though. What do you think of the following players:
curiouskarmadog
Blight
ZZ (xyzzy)
RogueBen
CrashTextDummie
KScope

[IH]

Care to address my other point?

Nah, since it's a choice of reading inflection to choose which one, if there is one, that you would consider was major from those points I posted about UA.

Also, you don;t think someone trying to outguess Fritz mod, because "Discworld wouldn't be vanilla?" is scummy? That's not even because he was wrong about Jordan. I mean that would be way more likely to be a vanilla role to Fritz, imo, than something else. I mean, it's Fritz.

I don't associate Discworld with the word 'bitches'

I do associate the word bitches with Fritz though.

Bitches.

[Fritzler]

I do associate the word bitches with Fritz though.

Bitches.

There's a reason IH and I are friends

:goodposting:

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

EBWOP: And no, I'm not advocating a Cephrir lynch right now. I'm not even sure why he's being strung up. I'd like to put some pressure on some of the people who are just wagoning relentlessly and/or are stating things without choosing to back them up at all. *eyes KScope*

Interesting how you only name me after I've shown I'm suspicious of you. IGMEOY

[Glork]

KScope, a few things:
1) I'm not the OMGUSy type. You ought to know this by now, and if you don't, ask anybody.
2) I don't understand why you're singling out your

own

name on the list, when that list included first mentions of several players (such as karmadog, RogueBen, and Blight) who are not suspicious of me.
3) I explicitly stated earlier that I wanted pressure on people who hadn't posted much and/or hadn't substantiated their opinions. You absolutely fall into that category, so there is no reason to suspect or assume OMGUS.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

KScope, a few things:
1) I'm not the OMGUSy type. You ought to know this by now, and if you don't, ask anybody.

You can learn it.

2) I don't understand why you're singling out your

own

name on the list, when that list included first mentions of several players (such as karmadog, RogueBen, and Blight) who are not suspicious of me.

I quoted what you wrote. The post only mentioned me. I found it worth noticing.

3) I explicitly stated earlier that I wanted pressure on people who hadn't posted much and/or hadn't substantiated their opinions. You absolutely fall into that category, so there is no reason to suspect or assume OMGUS.

I don't think I'm denieing that, I'm just making my usual observations.

[Blight]

Alright, that was a ton of posts to read. Flameaxe is clearly town. MoS-JDodge thing doesn't seem scummy on either side, more like a misunderstanding. I have to agree with CKD that there doesn't seem to be any particular reason why Glork has accumulated 5 votes, although I didn't go look. Nobody sticks out to me as scum at the moment, may have to read some people's posts in isolation later.

Unvote Sarc

.

I get the sinking gut feeling that this post is just a mafioso masquerading to look active.

Too much agreeing not enough isolated opinion. Not enough curiosity shall we say.

vote Cephrir

I really don't like how you started this wagon (and how people followed you with weak reasoning). It seemed pretty opportunistic, if you ask me.

Vote: theopor_COD

[Blight]

I forgot that I was voting someone else earlier.

Unvote, Vote: Thin Man

[Blight]

Bah. I'll get this right eventually.

Unvote, Vote: theopor_COD

[theopor_COD]

I really don't like how you started this wagon (and how people followed you with weak reasoning). It seemed pretty opportunistic, if you ask me.

Vote: theopor_COD

Let me get this straight. You don't like how I started the wagon (note - I think it was a relevant vote I didn't like Cephrir's post it's awfully non-committal, I'd add I'm not entirely delighted with Cephrir's reaction either). You also don't like how people followed me with weak reasoning namely JDodge, Sarc, MoS, Kscope. Who do you think is being more opportunisic me for pointing out a decent reason for voting Ceph or the other four for their votes?

[Sarcastro]

I really don't like how you started this wagon (and how people followed you with weak reasoning). It seemed pretty opportunistic, if you ask me.

I really don't like how you're scum.