Regfan:
Both these comments were before BH entered the game. Also saying that he didn't think CA was in danger of being lynched and that he wasn't interested in the case on him is not quite the same thing as thinking he's town. Why do you not think that his most recent comment which clearly implies consent with the lynch overrides these indifferent comments on BH's predecessors?
Saying that he didn't find the case appealing is him saying he doesn't agree with the lynch, yet if you watch he made no real case or attempt to actually scum hunt and consider putting up a strong case against anyone else to get the lynch changed. His recent comments in regards to BH's are overridden because they essentially were OMGUS comments, the second BH attempted to make a case against Dry, Dry said he changed his mind, but also didn't change his vote.
The difference is that if you succeed you probably have scum, whereas if you succeed protecting someone you only have town. (Both of course, requiring you're reasonably sure about that person to begin with). I'm not claiming that trying to block the kill rather than to protect the victim is a far superior strategy (although I think it is slightly), just that your dismissal of it is unfounded.
Actually I have a question here, to either the mod or anyone who wants to answer it. Do both mafia visit (Make the kill) as in if one mafia was jailed the one who sent in the kill order, would a no lynch occur or would the 'partner' make the kill while they were jailed. Because I'm used to both mafia visiting thus jailing one mafia while there's another alive is effectively useless.
Regfan, is Don_Johnson your scumbuddy?
No, I can assure you I am not mafia, thus it's impossible for anyone to be my scumbuddy.
Man, I am not liking the way Regfan starts out this day. The way he leans on his town read of semioldguy looks sketchy and the way he's tunneling on Dry-fit looks even worse. The whole outing power roles could be dismissed as being eager, but this wording really bugs me:
So you're saying that myself getting a town read on semi the guy who was helping us the most and when seeing him die being shocked that the jailer didn't jail him is scummy? I'd like you to elaborate on how you can even believe this.
Yes, I do have a sense of tunnel vision on against Dry, but that is because I'm quite confident in him being mafia.
If you take a look at all my points about the power-roles, they are all very valid. The best way to proceed today would be if our tracker does have a guilty, and how does suggesting they come out if they have one be suspicious. It's the best course of action, I'm not here saying 'TRACKER CLAIM, TRACKER WHERE ARE YOU'. I'm simply stating under what circumstances I believe it is in our best interest for the tracker to claim. If you wish to refute these circumstances, I would love to hear it otherwise I'd like you to explain yourself in regards to how my past-experience at epic mafia has anything to do with 'not helping the town'.
i wouldn't call it reliable just yet. i more or eless wanted an answer from regfan. he's really got me fence sitting. the power role talk and the nk speculation makes me want to lynch him, but its hard to argue with some of his points.
