Mini Normal 1609: The Case Of Doctor Pepper (Game Over)

FakeGod · Post Post #2650 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:42 pm

In post 2648, Wake1 wrote:Which is why I'm asking them to quote the posts here, instead of giving summaries.

I'd rather see the vase than be told what it looks like. I think you would know this, FG.

Actually, I'd much prefer to be told what it looks like.

Don't assume things.

FakeGod · Post Post #2651 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:45 pm

In post 1426, Bert wrote:
Vote Count 1.11

BlueBloodedToffee(5)
– Flubbernugget, Csareo, Boonskiies, Doogal121, Wake88[/area]

In post 2118, Bert wrote:
Vote Count 1.22

JaggedAppliance(5)
– FakeGod, The Rufflig, Boonskiies, Flubbernugget, Doogal121[/area]

Flubber, Doogal, and Boons were on both town wagons.

Boonskiies · Post Post #2652 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:22 pm

massive: no result.

FakeGod · Post Post #2653 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:37 pm

well then

Vote: Rufflig

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2654 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:24 pm

3 claimed PR's and scum look elsewhere.

That certainly is interesting.

FakeGod · Post Post #2655 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:30 pm

In post 2640, FakeGod wrote:BBT, did you reveal your partner to TTH during the night?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2656 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:36 pm

No, I didn't

FakeGod · Post Post #2657 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:41 pm

In post 2654, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:3 claimed PR's and scum look elsewhere.

That certainly is interesting.

It means scum are rather confident in the status quo.

Should we lynch in the box (Doogal/Flubber/Boons) or out of the box (massive/AK/Rufflig)?

FakeGod · Post Post #2658 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:44 pm

Out of Doogal/Flubber/Boons, I'd probably lynch Doogal first.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2659 (ISO) » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:56 pm

In. And I'd prefer Flubber.

The Rufflig · Post Post #2660 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:28 am

In post 2654, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:3 claimed PR's and scum look elsewhere.

That certainly is interesting.

It was fairly obvious who your partner was. The only two players who had not voted for you or been voted by you were massive and Green Crayons. From there it was a moderate exercise in reading isos. Fake God and I both figured it out yesterday (see post 2119). Still, it seemed like a pretty stupid shot for the scum to make.
---

In post 2651, FakeGod wrote:Flubber, Doogal, and Boons were on both town wagons

You were also on both wagons.
BlueBloodedToffee's wagon reached its peak in post #1778 for the second time.

1778) FakeGod votes BlueBloodedToffee

BlueBloodedToffee

(6): Flubbernugget, Csareo, Boonskiies, Doogal121, Wake88, FakeGod
Boonskiies (5):

BlueBloodedToffee

, massive,

Jagged Appliance

, TellTaleHeart,

Green Crayons

Not Voting: The Rufflig, Anatole Kuragin

In spite of Fake God blaming Wake88 for BBT claiming mason, it was Fake God's vote here that led to it. If you want to split hairs, Fake God chose to trust Csareo's scum read on BBT.

Wake1 · Post Post #2661 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:40 am

I'm up for lynching FakeGod for peddling that BS that I'm somehow responsible for outing BBT's fakeclaim when I was simply doing what I'm supposed to do: asking questions. I don't really trust his shtick about me being a solid Town read to him, and I think it's a bunch of bunk to manipulate me. Methinks it'll all-too-conveniently change when Scum-FG has better control on this game. A few dead Scum tried that shtick with me before and failed.

VOTE: FakeGod

Wake1 · Post Post #2662 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:41 am

Did I put BBT to L1 when he claimed Mason?

Flubbernugget · Post Post #2663 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:35 am

Wake we can lynch FakeGod when he stops being useful. Right now he's our best defense from shitfests.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2664 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:42 am

What are your thoughts on D1 Flubber?

FakeGod · Post Post #2665 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:46 am

The "reasonable" thing to do would be to lynch inside the box, since that's where the VCA indicates where the scum would be.

The Green Canyon kill worries me though.

It means scum decided that they're fine with Flubber/Dougal/Boons coming under suspicion today.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2666 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:50 am

In post 2665, FakeGod wrote:
It means scum decided that they're fine with Flubber/Dougal/Boons coming under suspicion today.

What makes you think that scum thought it would be those three who would come under fire today? I mentioned the voting pattern yesterday and nobody paid any attention to me at all.

FakeGod · Post Post #2667 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:57 am

Voting pattern means little without the alignment confirmation, which, we now have.

hmmm....

I thought that Rufflig, who I knew to have figured out who the second mason was, decided to shoot Green Canyon for some reason.

Rufflig, I agree that GC kill was dumb, but can you explain why?

FakeGod · Post Post #2668 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:58 am

Happy Birthday Rufflig

FakeGod · Post Post #2669 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:05 am

In post 2663, Flubbernugget wrote:Wake we can lynch FakeGod when he stops being useful. Right now he's our best defense from shitfests.

As your first post of day 2, this post is very strange.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2670 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:07 am

In post 2667, FakeGod wrote:Voting pattern means little without the alignment confirmation, which, we now have.

hmmm....

I thought that Rufflig, who I knew to have figured out who the second mason was, decided to shoot Green Canyon for some reason.

Rufflig, I agree that GC kill was dumb, but can you explain why?

I guess. I was pretty confident in my JA town-read so maybe it felt a little more solid to me on D1 because of it.

You didn't answer why you thought scum would expect Flubber/Boon/Doogal to come under pressure today.

FakeGod · Post Post #2671 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:11 am

Scum knows that shooting Green Canyon, and confirming you as Mason, will confirm that those three players are the only players who have been on town wagons.

Yet, they shot GC anyway.

Wake1 · Post Post #2672 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:15 am

Well for one I'm feeling that certain players are ignoring me, which is unfortunate. GC didn't seem to want to listen or engage with much if any of my posts, either. Another thing that I'm feeling is that the wagon on JA was Scum-motivated, and that I was absolutely right about it being wrong, although no one listened. I do question Flubber's jumping in to defend FG from me. I'm not sure what I should think of that movement.

I know I'm Town, and I don't think DP would screw with us and use a Mafia Mason/other bastard elements. Since BBT is Town, he should be more willing to work with me. Engage a bit on ideas, you know? I want to understand what he thinks of TTH, and whether or not we should go ahead and lynch her. Also, if there's no protective role used on BBT tonight, he's basically dead because confTown.

FG, Scum had no certainty GC was a Mason.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #2673 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:17 am

Scum may also have thought that the Csareo/Titus slot would come under pressure because of how hard he was pushing me D1. They may have thought that's where the attention would do given nobody listened to my theory on voting patterns yesterday.

Can we lynch Flubber today then?

VOTE: Flubber

FakeGod · Post Post #2674 (ISO) » Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:18 am

In post 2672, Wake1 wrote:FG, Scum had no certainty GC was a Mason.

How do you know this?

It wasn't exactly a state secret.

Rufflig and I figured it out yesterday. As Rufflig put it, it was just an exercise in ISO.