Mini 598 - Justice Justice - Abandoned

[kabenon007]

Ok, I'm back, basically. I'll do a reread, but this game is going to be hard to reread due to the different games. As such, it might take a little bit.

[VanDamien]

I would like to see Weyoun's rationalization of his vote on kabenon, considering he said the vote was because kabenon hadn't posted, although the post directly above this claim was from kabenon......

This, a very little.

The conclusion I come to is that kabenon is probably "dumping his vote" because WLC voted for him for a ridiculous reason and still hasn't come back to defend himself when the reason made no sense. I, personally, see this as completely reasonable.

Further, the contexts of abnormally and normally are totally different. What would make this instance abnormal? 'Normally' kabenon would see it as a scum tell, so he voted for WLC.

This, much more.

However, at the current time, I'm suspicious because of the incident that WLC voted saying kabenon hadn't posted immediately after kabenon's post, but I doubt that either is scum.

This, especially the last bit.

[VanDamien]

Is anyone else still playing?

[ZombieSlayer54]

Vote Skruffs

For his attempts to mislead and confuse the townies.

Which attempts? My memory is pretty sketchy at best. The post numbers will be fine.

VanDamien, like Zombieslayer, please refer to the posts that link glotnot and kabenon together. Post numbers will be fine as well.

239 + 243.

[WeyounsLastClone]

As for the Glotnot-kabenon connection, post 156 is a weak indicator. Post 171, and more so 178 where he says at most one of kabenon/WLC is mafia also deal with this.

123 shows a weak possible link Glotnot/Skruffs.

Otherwise, there's not much to take from day 1. There were 4 votes on the bandwagon on me, one of them was Glotnot's. I don't really know if there's another scum on that list. If so, kabenon could be it.

With a deadline tomorrow, seems we're up for another no lynch, so hopefully the hides/vigs will do something useful.

[Max]

1 day to sunset (night)

Vote Count

kabenon007 (2): WeyounsLastClone, VanDamien

skitzer (1): Skruffs

WeyounsLastClone
Skruffs
killa seven
angelmouse
J-man
ZombieSlayer54
chaotic_diablo
VanDamien

Votes Required For Lynch 6

I'm sending a mass prod although you are meant to be in power of the prods mod intervention in this case is necessary.

[ZombieSlayer54]

You act as if I have not posted today, Max.

[Max]

I mass pm'd everyone two people in the days without any activity means you should get 3X as much now!

[Skruffs]

I am here! Will post tomorrow in depth. (Really busy)

[skitzer]

This game is too confusing for me. I guess I'm just not clever enough for Maxgames.

Requesting Replacement{/b]

[skitzer]

EBWOP: Messed up tags.

Requesting Replacement

[Max]

In

ANOTHER

unlynchful day. Noone was lynched

The Vote Count:

kabenon007 (2): WeyounsLastClone, VanDamien

skitzer (1): Skruffs

WeyounsLastClone
Skruffs
killa seven
angelmouse
J-man
ZombieSlayer54
chaotic_diablo
VanDamien

Votes Required For Lynch 6

[Max]

And in an uneventful night noone was killed.

The murders just continue don't they

9 alive, 5 to lynch

[Korts]

This Oklahoma D3 now, right?

[WeyounsLastClone]

Yes. Unless there are doctors in Oklahoma as well, it means no one used their vig. Have to reread the first two days, but I hope we have some more discussion today, if enough people pick up their pords.

[kabenon007]

This is the game in whick Korts claimed to have vigged ZS, correct? I agree with VanDamien that that is a scummy move to claim it and assume that means he is confirmed, as if he were scum trying to slip under our radars, hoping we would forget that Oklahoma mafia have a one shot vig in Oklahoma instead of a nightkill.

But then if Korts is scum, and he is trying to pass as a town who used his vig, does that mean he used his one shot? I would guess not, and the scum set it up that one would use their one shot and then another would claim it. That is just my hypothesis for that one.

vote: korts

[Korts]

And what would be the sense in that, kabenon, one scum using their vig and the other claiming the kill?

[kabenon007]

I'll continue to use you as an example. Your buddy makes the kill, using his one shot. He is now useless as a scum other than being the informed minority. So, if one scum were to claim the kill, if he did, he would be "confirmed" in the town's mind if the ploy worked. But instead, the scum use the ploy by having you, a scum who has not used their one shot, make the claim, thereby "confirming" a scum with a one shot power instead of " confirming" a scum with no powers at all. That way, the unpowered scum would be more likely to be lynched than the one who claimed a vig kill.

[Korts]

Oh yeah, I see. So the scum would effectively save a shot, by having that player confirmed by the kill.

[kabenon007]

Right, but that's only if we believe the claim, and completely let them off the hook.

[WeyounsLastClone]

I actually don't get it. You say Korts hasn't used his shot, but is claiming to have done so instead of another scum? Now Korts, who still has his shot left, draws all the attention, possibly getting himself lynched/killed, losing his vig-shot he supposedly has left in the process. Something's fishy here.

[killa seven]

woah, i missed alot i guess. i need a re read

[kabenon007]

I actually don't get it. You say Korts hasn't used his shot, but is claiming to have done so instead of another scum? Now Korts, who still has his shot left, draws all the attention, possibly getting himself lynched/killed, losing his vig-shot he supposedly has left in the process. Something's fishy here.

What attention? Nobody has really placed that much attention on him. He isn't under that much suspicion. And yes, if the scum who had used their one shot was the one who claimed the kill, then it is more likely they would be left alone and therefore the scums with a one shot left were more likely to be found.

I'm saying if this is a ploy, and Korts is scum, I think he still has his kill left.

[Korts]

I actually don't get it. You say Korts hasn't used his shot, but is claiming to have done so instead of another scum? Now Korts, who still has his shot left, draws all the attention, possibly getting himself lynched/killed, losing his vig-shot he supposedly has left in the process. Something's fishy here.

What attention? Nobody has really placed that much attention on him. He isn't under that much suspicion. And yes, if the scum who had used their one shot was the one who claimed the kill, then it is more likely they would be left alone and therefore the scums with a one shot left were more likely to be found.

I'm saying if this is a ploy, and Korts is scum, I think he still has his kill left.

But this is a dumb ploy, because it puts the scum who has a kill left at risk by having him claim and therefore in the spotlight of the town. It wouldn't necessarily get the scum lynched, but with him in the spotlight, any mistakes made would be doubly noted.

[Max]

EMPking has replaced skitzer