Oman wrote:Lowell lurking is no big tell.
Yes.Flameaxe wrote:From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.
Yep thats a 100% correct he lurks in every game he plays, not quite sure why though. So you have to nullify that factor and look for other things that are against him to truly see if he is scum or not.Flameaxe wrote:The fact that he lurks in all games he plays.
How can there be anything against him, if he always lurks?death_omen wrote:Yep thats a 100% correct he lurks in every game he plays, not quite sure why though. So you have to nullify that factor and look for other things that are against him to truly see if he is scum or not.Flameaxe wrote:The fact that he lurks in all games he plays.
This post reeks of scumminess. Uncomfortable with pressure and buddying up to someone.bubka wrote:hey, I abstained from voting on you earlier, why are you after me now?Lazy wrote:Isn't it 100% clear that Lowell IS lurking?bubka wrote:I don't think it is so clear that lowel is lurking though. I myself often think that way, looking for mistakes as others rant on.
Unvote
Vote: bubka
100% agreed. The resulting wagon was like "lolwut?"; not a good wagon.stark wrote:I'm thinking that 223 was just bubka's lack of experience and attempt at humor. I doubt that it's a genuine scum thing.
However, I would like to see his explanation, as he hasn't offered one for the two pages its been discussed over, which I find more scummy than the actual comment itself
QFTDragonsofSummer wrote:I doubt this logic.death_omen wrote:Vote:SirTornado
If they wont post there suspicions after picking up a prod, a vote may actually make them want to say something.
Looks like scumlogic to me...death_omen wrote:Vote:SirTornado
If they wont post there suspicions after picking up a prod, a vote may actually make them want to say something.
yea...Kakeng wrote:Are we waiting for d_o to post or something?
Flameaxe wrote:So yea....go Rockies.