Prodded. Okay, I need to stress out less about wasting my posts, and apologies to Gin, but I don't want to write an essay on every single post, and I'm not sure it's even necessarily healthy to try.
Besides, I have the high post count.
Prof's strategy here is fine in a vacuum, but she should know that when push comes to shove, (say, at deadline) I'm going to be watching her very closely. Her take on anti's answer about the randomization is close to mine, in that I find it baffling. He says not to TR Gin for strategy talk up front, but doesn't think scum would share their restriction? I mean, if anything its the other way around, scum would want to give the impression that they have nothing to hide and don't want to be the weird kid that stands out. You know, like how Lycan threatened Prof.
I was watching to see if she would wilt at the threat, but she didn't, but rather refined her own individual approach, suggesting that this is something she actually cares about and is not using it as a rhetorical platform. *my initial statement still stands, though.
I said I didn't see a scum angle to zzzx's start, but there is
most definitely
a pro-scum angle to voting NM the way he did, and his reasoning smells fishy. I'll talk about this more in the morning.
I liked Gin's push on Lycan, but I need to reread to remind myself why.
Three players have all said they follow my reasoning and that never happens.
I'll post again in the morning.
--
YO UMLAUT, WHERE YOU AT?