Mini 391 - Fairytale Mafia, Game Over

[Ripley]

divestment of accountability.

Well I don't know about the rest of you, but

I'm

impressed.

[yellowbounder]

I'm sure you are, Mr. Ripley. But some are not so impressed with flashy word things.

On a completely unrelated note, we made the second page of random voting. Congratulations.

[IH]

I'm sure you are, Mr. Ripley. But some are not so impressed with flashy word things.

On a completely unrelated note, we made the second page of random voting. Congratulations.

Now I'm impressed.

Hawt damn!

[Echo419]

Big words, Seoul. COunting with clapping, I get 27 syllables.

[Green Crayons]

Just what kind of crazy, clap-happy hands do you have, Echo?

[Echo419]

I gots crazy rythm, dogz.

[Dodgy]

Hey guys, forgive me for being English, sheesh!

FOS:Rathyr

for trying to create a bandwagon so early on.
Its always a supicious trate.

[chaotic_diablo]

Vote Count

Vote Count
IH (1) : yellowbounder
Rathyr (2) : bird111, Echo419
Dodgy (3) : wolfsbane, IH, Rathyr
Green Crayons (1) : LuckayLuck
Bird111 (2) : Green Crayons, Seol
LuckayLuck (1) : Ripley
Echo419 (1) : Dodgy

Not Voting: jl2704

It's 7 to banish a player.

[LuckayLuck]

divestment of accountability.

Well I don't know about the rest of you, but

I'm

impressed.

Honestly, this is like 1/1000th of a mafia tell, trying to buddy up to somebody, but I see nothing worse out there on the board right now.

FOS: Ripley

[Ripley]

Heck, if everyone else has avoided giving as much as 1/1000th of a scum tell you people must be really good. I'm suitably alarmed.

Hello again IH btw. I almost didn't notice you over there.

[Green Crayons]

Don't you know that being suitably alarmed is 999/1000th of a scum tell? This just isn't your game.

Unvote, Vote: LuckayLuck

for aparently seeing nothing else more suspicious. One should look harder, then.

[IH]

I know, it's like you, SV, and Patrick are in half my games.

GC, is that also a scum tell?

[LuckayLuck]

My vote on Green Crayons is no longer random. I'm now voting him for accusing me of something ridiculous. Everybody was laying low, no sign of mafia anymore, I made a suggestion that I saw nobody as being mafia-ish so I pointed out a small thing. Now, he's voting for me because apparently there was something bigger.

You honestly think there's something more suspicious? What was it before what I quoted?

[IH]

My vote on Green Crayons is no longer random. I'm now voting him for accusing me of something ridiculous. Everybody was laying low, no sign of mafia anymore, I made a suggestion that I saw nobody as being mafia-ish so I pointed out a small thing. Now, he's voting for me because apparently there was something bigger.

You honestly think there's something more suspicious? What was it before what I quoted?

Eh, I took it more as a joke myself. Especially when he made the (what I took to be) sarcastic remark into something of a scum tell.

FoS:LuckayLuck

[wolfsbane]

Hey guys, forgive me for being English, sheesh!

FOS:Rathyr

for trying to create a bandwagon so early on.
Its always a supicious trate.

Holy OMGUS Batman! Dodgy gets a third vote from Rathyr and slaps an FOS on him while convienently leaving his vote somewhere else. Who's trying to start the bandwagon here?
Then LuckayLuck comes along with the less subtle OMGUS on Green Crayons. It's getting ugly in Fairyland. I'll leave my vote on Dodgy for now...

[Echo419]

Lame. I was hoping for three pages of spam.
Dodgy, what goes on? I don't think Raythr was bandwagoning in a random phase seriously. As for GC/LL, meh. Seems like they're jumping on each other for small reasons.

[bird1111]

Agreeing with Echo that GC/LL are jumping on eachother for small reasons.

Though is the three pages of spam remark supposed to be a joke?

[Green Crayons]

Eh, I took it more as a joke myself. Especially when he made the (what I took to be) sarcastic remark into something of a scum tell.

Bingo. I just got bored with my bird vote, and we're still only on page two with - as you have so aptly pointed out - little to go on, so a pointless vote shift was what I was feeling at the moment.

But hurrah, you helped me chalk up a suspicion tally under Echo (granted a small one). So it wasn't all for shits.

[IH]

[quote="Bird1111]Though is the three pages of spam remark supposed to be a joke? [/quote]

I'd say so.

[LuckayLuck]

Lame. I was hoping for three pages of spam.

I don't think the 3 pages of spam remark is a joke, it's what I hope for too, honestly, it's why I even riled things up by pointing out a 1/1000th scum tell. Someone needs to get the gears of mafia hunting rolling. I'm the type of guy who likes to poke at people to try to get a scum / townie tell.

In other news, I think that Echo419 demonstrated a 1/100th townie tell. CONTRARY to what you think actually GC. I think the more posts that happens, the clearer a pitcure and story is painted for townie observation.

[Green Crayons]

CONTRARY to what you think actually GC. I think the more posts that happens, the clearer a pitcure and story is painted for townie observation.

I'd like for you to point out to me at what point I said that more posts somehow equate to a bad thing.

[LuckayLuck]

But hurrah, you helped me chalk up a suspicion tally under Echo (granted a small one). So it wasn't all for shits.

This implies that you thought echo's post was scummy, I thought echo's post was townie. Neither of us said having more posts was a bad thing.

[Rathyr]

This is me checking in. I don't have much to say at the moment.

However, without sounding like a scummy counter-OMGUSer, I think that GC is rather agressive today, unlike the way he played in the last game he was in, werewolf 183 or something.

Perhaps he is simply trying to get the game on the road.

[Green Crayons]

This implies that you thought echo's post was scummy, I thought echo's post was townie. Neither of us said having more posts was a bad thing.

Oh. With the punctuation of your comments, it looked like you were saying that contrary to what I believe, you think that more posts equals good.

Granted, now I'm curious as to why you think Echo's post made him a bit more on the town side for you. His comment "Seems like they're jumping on each other for small reasons." seems like he's reaching for something to post simply so he can post something, which is what I've done a few times while scum. Granted, it's not much and is a pretty weak suspicion point (more or less just giving me a nudge to scruitinize his posts a bit more), but it's there nonetheless. I'm curious as to why he was moved in the opposite direction in your opinion.

However, without sounding like a scummy counter-OMGUSer, I think that GC is rather agressive today, unlike the way he played in the last game he was in, werewolf 183 or something.

Different games means different players, which means different ways of interacting. I'm curious if you find "aggressive" to be a bad/suspicious, or are simply stating an obvservation to let others believe that :aggressive" should be interpreted in the negative.

[IH]

Granted, now I'm curious as to why you think Echo's post made him a bit more on the town side for you. His comment "Seems like they're jumping on each other for small reasons." seems like he's reaching for something to post simply so he can post something, which is what I've done a few times while scum. Granted, it's not much and is a pretty weak suspicion point (more or less just giving me a nudge to scruitinize his posts a bit more), but it's there nonetheless. I'm curious as to why he was moved in the opposite direction in your opinion.

It's page 1 on a day 2 start. You also just seemed to contradict yourself. He's reaching for something to post, and posts a small suspicion. You say you do that as scum. You then say that's not much, and is still a weak suspicion.

Perhaps he's just trying to get the game started a little more. It is only the second page.

I think that's good enough this early in the game for an

unvote, Vote:Green Crayons

Unless I misunderstood you.