Now you have no excuse for it not being obvious and you have gained the ability to bother someone else.
Good day to you SIR.
In post 1866, davesaz wrote:@Mala, it's important for us to have a detailed explanation of your BBT and Shinobi reads, because they're coming up a solid scum read for multiple people. I in particular could use some input because I'm seeing multiple sets of people who could be town who are agreeing with each other or could be scum together.
In post 1869, Shinobi wrote:We're probably just going to end up lynching somebody boring like Peabody or something.
And I still don't know what the case on him is.
In post 1876, Malakittens wrote:He also townslipped IMO in the beginning of D2. I know it's weak, but if he was scum and he was talking to his partners about who we should kill etc he would have remembered that someone was dead.
In post 1860, Shinobi wrote:Wisdom, I have a question for you whenever you're around:
You said that my post on the fight between triton/me wasn't a normal townie thought process. Why did it change from a townie thing that you commented on when you were catching up? You commented on my #583 and it was pretty much the same reasoning in regards to two different players, but now it's fake. Why?
In post 1886, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I have pointed out somebody who had 'silly' reasons for voting NPAU and you claim to have already seen this/had this in mind and you doing nothing to chase it up. This doesn't make sense. If you saw it, and wasn't happy with it, why didn't you mention it?
In post 1067, Josh_B wrote:
Wisdom, I'm scum reading your slot because Metal Sonic said that both GM and NPAU were scum, dispite obvious in game conflicts between the two parties. It doesn't help that he voted, then unvoted GM, yet still wanted to lynch her. And also wasn't on the NPAU lynch even though that was one of his top scum reads.
What do you think about the game so far?
In post 1886, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:this doesn't really excuse you joining a wagon your scum-read is leading.