That's quite a case you've got there.
In post 1841, farside22 wrote:This was you point with no reason day 3.
The only thing I was wrong about was you did eventually vote ric as a hammer.
False. That post lays out my reasoning for thinking it was you and Ricastle.
False. Your reaction to Dolittle's 'cop' post moved you into my suspect pile, and I explained this.
In post 1841, farside22 wrote:Pushing ric as town here:
In post 1628, Azral wrote:I'm open to voting farside.
I keep going back to Dolittle's interactions with Alch and thinking they look town.
That post literally doesn't mention Ricastle at all.
In post 1694, Azral wrote:That took an embarassingly long time to happen.
+ town points for Ricastle for being on zakk so hard
- town points for farside for the back-and-forth on the zakk
The post where I believed Persival's scum claim and started moving forward with finding his partners.
The one where I had zero idea Persival was going to flip town.
You're trying to use that post against me?
If Persival had flipped scum, it would definitely have made Ric look good. But he didn't.
Yes. Correct. That's how games are solved, by talking to people.
I'm pretty sure you said that yourself, like yesterday.
In post 1841, farside22 wrote:This is not meta research it says nothing other then he decided to show a scum game but doesn't reference a town game. Basically just to show a negative for no reason provided.
That really bothered you.
I talk about it above. And I would have done an analysis anyway if you hadn't suddenly voted me barely a day later.
Anything else?