In post 156, Salamence20 wrote:I promise my own vote tomorrow if you flip town.
In post 108, Xayzeck wrote:I used to think that early D1 derphammers were town-telling. After a recent game I've decide that shouldn't be the case. Either read it as null, or read it as scum.
In post 182, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Intent. Claim please.
In post 179, Salamence20 wrote:Pretty sure he is scum.
In post 181, Not_Mafia wrote:He's (SKOT) getting lynched regardless and we need his flip to really progress so I say hammer
In post 166, Xayzeck wrote:Well, here are some problems with your scumspects:
havingfitz made 2 posts D1, RVS vote, simple RVS questions
Salamence had random banter, RVSish vote, more banter, how quickhammers are scummy as fuck
BBT had RVS, paying attention to RVS wagons, not unvoting because the quickhammer would be scummy as fuck
Now I understand the position you're in if you're town, you're frustrated and you think the wagon on you is scum motivated.
It's not. The quickhammer is scummy as fuck, and the wagon on you is tons town motivated.
Threatening with "I'm going to flip town"? Why not substantiate your case?
Your top scumspects are people who were on the lynching wagon yesterday AND today, except this makes no sense.
Yesterday absolutely NOTHING happened. It was just an RVS wagon, that I think even Catastrophe didn't really care about. The only thing scum motivated about that wagon was the hammer, because otherwise, it was completely normal. Today's wagon is town-motivated. You deprived town of information by lynching a town without allowing for discussion or associative tells.
Basically I think your reads are derp and you're scummy as hell, saying "oh i'll flip town" won't make me go "oh i guess so".
Are you going to substantiate your Sala read with the Slandaar kill? Well, to those who are voting Salamence because of the kill, I've got a big problem with it too.
Night. Kill. WiFom.
It's dumb, it's stupid, avoid it please. Unless it's really bloody obvious that it points to something, don't use it as a reason to vote someone. There are much better reasons to vote other people, like something that ACTUALLY happened *nudgequickhammernudge*.
98 - I forgot to reply to this and the 2 things you brought up.
"Less importantly, Slandaar knew he wasn't masons or neighbours with Salamence, and that would have come out eventually with either of their flips."
Then he wouldn't have crumbed it in the first place? This implies that Sala KNOWS the crumb is going to fail, why would he crumb at all?
"More importantly, Sharp is absolutely prime to be lynched here with this as Slandaar's last post"
Sharp would be and should be lynched regardless of who died.
In post 166, Xayzeck wrote:Well, here are some problems with your scumspects:
havingfitz made 2 posts D1, RVS vote, simple RVS questions
Salamence had random banter, RVSish vote, more banter, how quickhammers are scummy as fuck
BBT had RVS, paying attention to RVS wagons, not unvoting because the quickhammer would be scummy as fuck
Now I understand the position you're in if you're town, you're frustrated and you think the wagon on you is scum motivated.
It's not. The quickhammer is scummy as fuck, and the wagon on you is tons town motivated.
Threatening with "I'm going to flip town"? Why not substantiate your case?
Your top scumspects are people who were on the lynching wagon yesterday AND today, except this makes no sense.
Yesterday absolutely NOTHING happened. It was just an RVS wagon, that I think even Catastrophe didn't really care about. The only thing scum motivated about that wagon was the hammer, because otherwise, it was completely normal. Today's wagon is town-motivated. You deprived town of information by lynching a town without allowing for discussion or associative tells.
Basically I think your reads are derp and you're scummy as hell, saying "oh i'll flip town" won't make me go "oh i guess so".
Are you going to substantiate your Sala read with the Slandaar kill? Well, to those who are voting Salamence because of the kill, I've got a big problem with it too.
Night. Kill. WiFom.
It's dumb, it's stupid, avoid it please. Unless it's really bloody obvious that it points to something, don't use it as a reason to vote someone. There are much better reasons to vote other people, like something that ACTUALLY happened *nudgequickhammernudge*.
98 - I forgot to reply to this and the 2 things you brought up.
"Less importantly, Slandaar knew he wasn't masons or neighbours with Salamence, and that would have come out eventually with either of their flips."
Then he wouldn't have crumbed it in the first place? This implies that Sala KNOWS the crumb is going to fail, why would he crumb at all?
"More importantly, Sharp is absolutely prime to be lynched here with this as Slandaar's last post"
Sharp would be and should be lynched regardless of who died.
In post 191, Not_Mafia wrote:You flipping town wouldn't shock me but I think you're more likely to flip scum because of the timestamp issue and the whole thing looked orchestrated. It is a combination of utility lynch and info flip
In post 182, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Intent. Claim please.
In post 181, Not_Mafia wrote:He's (SKOT) getting lynched regardless and we need his flip to really progress so I say hammer