Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Thok's title is a reference to a lulz moment. For a while, I was set to have "Mafia #2" because I misread that in my role PM to mean that there were two Mafias (as opposed to me being Mafia Member #2).
Better to look back and laugh at the experience than feel bad about it.
Oh I'm sure it is, and I do find the humour in it. I just hardly think its "title-worthy" as it was nothing but a bad claim, with a heavy dose of the truth.
But it's funny. The whole point of a title is to sum up something memorable about someone; that's memorable.
I'm tempted to make a thread to complain about peoples' right to veto nominations for themselves; the title is a site idea, after all, and should NEVER be their choice.
Nominate xyzzy for "Annoying Twit"
Second.
Third.
:sadtorch Ken Hoang, A.D/Fuzzie, Cameron Ferris, Taj Johnson-George, Annie Duke, Patti Blagojevich, Maria/Tiffany :sadtorch
:torch Tammy/Victor, Dan/Jordan
for this game among others. Mostly because 90% of the stuff he says is craplogic, to the point that he's even started calling himself that and admitting that his posts are probably illogical. Yet he still does it anyways. I would also accept "Crap Logic Korlash", but I think the multiple K's are kool. =P
for this game among others. Mostly because 90% of the stuff he says is craplogic, to the point that he's even started calling himself that and admitting that his posts are probably illogical. Yet he still does it anyways. I would also accept "Crap Logic Korlash", but I think the multiple K's are kool. =P
He's a fucking newbie, since when was the Title Fairy a thread for making fun of newbies who aren't as good as mafia as some other more experienced players? Seriously these attacks are the exact reason why newbies are being driven away from the site.
:sadtorch Ken Hoang, A.D/Fuzzie, Cameron Ferris, Taj Johnson-George, Annie Duke, Patti Blagojevich, Maria/Tiffany :sadtorch
:torch Tammy/Victor, Dan/Jordan
ShadowLurker wrote:
He's a fucking newbie, since when was the Title Fairy a thread for making fun of newbies who aren't as good as mafia as some other more experienced players? Seriously these attacks are the exact reason why newbies are being driven away from the site.
ShadowLurker wrote:
He's a fucking newbie, since when was the Title Fairy a thread for making fun of newbies who aren't as good as mafia as some other more experienced players? Seriously these attacks are the exact reason why newbies are being driven away from the site.
Out of curiosity, I looked at the thread in question. Someone else (I forget whom) said it first and then Korlash said he liked it, so it hardly seems like an attack.
I also like to nominate MoS as The Doctor Magnet, as at least two of the games that i have been in, MoS was Subject of a couple of MD protects. In Newbie 471, He was protected ALL game.
ehh i think KKK is the wrong image... I personally like the sound of Crap/Krap logic Korlash. Been calling myself that for a few games now... makes no difference to me title or not. (Bacause it' true XD)
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.
Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
Korlash wrote:ehh i think KKK is the wrong image... I personally like the sound of Crap/Krap logic Korlash. Been calling myself that for a few games now... makes no difference to me title or not. (Bacause it' true XD)
