In post 1559, Wisdom wrote:It isn't in general, but pecan first calls me town, then scum, then town, then he states he's certain I'm scum. And now he apparently states I'm town again. This is the weird part.
I haven't done that at all.
Those are things you've assumed, interpreted or attributed to me. I have never directly made it clear what I think of your alignment. This is you at your misrepping best. Just state things like they're fact, when really it's you making leaps of judgement and refusing to back down over them.
I mean I could run around in circles readdressing your #1510 and #1511 and try to point out exactly how the fundamentals in your logic are wrong and how you continue to sidestep key points that I make because they don't suit your drawn conclusions, but I may as well go right on beating that dead horse I've got sitting in the other room.
What bothers me is that the strongest indicators of you being town-aligned - and I've previously stated this - are by virtue of flips and interaction with said flips. A lot of your own actions are in contrast to this, for example when pushed at any point for details or explanations to your reads/actions the majority of your answers haven't gone beyond a virtual
'cause that's what I think
level of sophistication.
This is troubling, especially when your shifting reads raise my suspicion and yet you've now approached my shifting reads like I haven't shown any reasoning or detail to why they've shifted, when I feel I have at least been doing that. By all means take exception to me changing my reads, but don't pretend that switching a read on someone is an instant scumtell, for the most part you are once again lacking in any decent points or case on me. Much like all your cases this game.
Now I'm off to count the votes on 2Bs...
