In post 1497, Timeater wrote:pedit: exponential rage
Hey, hey, let's keep things algebraic. Rage of more than polynomial growth is disallowed.
In post 1497, Timeater wrote:pedit: exponential rage
In post 1499, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Were you talking more generally than #842? Because I don't see how it does that first thing. I agree re: the game mix-up but his play prior to that definitely looked the part. Did Mastin actually post?
In post 1475, Fate wrote:In post 1453, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I'll finish catching up tomorrow. Better than 50% chance I'll have something good.
Let me just give you a bit of algebra as promised: if R is a ring such that x^n=x for all x in R for some n, then R is commutative.
looks like CES is probably town just fyi
PEACE AGAIN FUCKERS
In post 1506, zabriel wrote:I'm not sure why Fate is refusing to claim flavor. Anybody remember when the Bomber did that during HPATPL?
In post 1507, Rainbowdash wrote:In post 1506, zabriel wrote:I'm not sure why Fate is refusing to claim flavor. Anybody remember when the Bomber did that during HPATPL?
Doesnt change his role claim wording to be either exceedingly lucky or strong towntell.
In post 1509, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:He stated the wording of "SK Cop" was game-relevant somehow pages back. Some dumb role thing, presumably.
Can you be productive and help get JS lynched now?
In post 1508, Timeater wrote:In post 1507, Rainbowdash wrote:Doesnt change his role claim wording to be either exceedingly lucky or strong towntell.
What wording? What are you even talking about? What does it have to do with luck?
In post 1510, pirate mollie wrote:
why not ask for jacob to be forced replaced? jacob is a low participant player and it is not alignment indicative for him. I would go after one of 10 million scummy players in this game than go after the low hanging fruit. I generally find going after lurkers right off the bat to be scummy but will do it in a pinch in order to compromise or if everyone is looking town and I don't want waste a good player on a possible misread. we don't have that problem here we have several players who are making posts that do NOT come from a town POV and they should be lynched for that but w/e, I guess I am the only one who is actually interested in catching scum here!
In post 1513, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 1510, pirate mollie wrote:
why not ask for jacob to be forced replaced? jacob is a low participant player and it is not alignment indicative for him. I would go after one of 10 million scummy players in this game than go after the low hanging fruit. I generally find going after lurkers right off the bat to be scummy but will do it in a pinch in order to compromise or if everyone is looking town and I don't want waste a good player on a possible misread. we don't have that problem here we have several players who are making posts that do NOT come from a town POV and they should be lynched for that but w/e, I guess I am the only one who is actually interested in catching scum here!
Asking for something that's not going to happen is not very useful. I do think we have that problem here (e.g. you're not even voting; there are still 6 votes on me for bv's lurking) + Jacob does look scummy. His reaction to the Fatemetaquestion was all wrong and he hasn't showcased an ounce of scumhunting here.
In post 1437, JacobSavage wrote:RBP, why do you have an.issue with Bv.
What is it that makes you think he's so town?
In post 1389, JacobSavage wrote:Do mafia SK Cops even exist?