@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
In post 153, Gravija wrote:@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
Is that scummy?
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
Well, it does read a bit like frustrated Town but that's not something that's hard to fake either.
In post 149, agi102 wrote:I am familiar with any and all strategies, but I don't remember everything about them. That's why I can't scum hunt effectively.
Just saying.
Don't worry about strategies. Just think motivation. Why do people say and do things?
In post 153, Gravija wrote:@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
@ffer: Eh, a couple of things. Not that many though.
@GM: Yeah. From my perspective, Notsci has posted absolutely NO legitimate reasoning. It's all OMGUS-esque BS and trolling from Notsci. Sakura has posted next to nothing, but at least it makes some semblance of sense.
I'm kinda enjoying the constant misreps from Grav.
@Ffery, I figured it was confused town. But here's what's bugging me- While others don't give explicit reasonings, Grav is getting on my case for not (when I clearly have been) and is doing the exact thing he's calling me out for doing- He has about as many posts as me with almost 0 content, yet is like "lolnsnocontent"
In post 158, Gravija wrote:@ffer: Eh, a couple of things. Not that many though.
@GM: Yeah. From my perspective, Notsci has posted absolutely NO legitimate reasoning. It's all OMGUS-esque BS and trolling from Notsci. Sakura has posted next to nothing, but at least it makes some semblance of sense.
What things?
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
In post 129, notscience wrote:
Does anyone notice how TSO got called out for his shtick about me then instantly nakedvotes without so much as a reason on Cabd?
I called TSO out for doing something arguably scummy, then he nakedvotes! This type of unconservative play is strongly alignned with standard scum play.[/SARCASM]
In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
Actually, my play in Newbies tends to be not-so-great. Laziness and an "unusual" (read: scummy) playstyle mean them and I don't always gel.
In post 83, agi102 wrote:Ok, so Sakura and Gravija don't understand this gambit. That's ok.
Also, link me to a game where someone has been replaced for idiocy.
Treat me like i'm five years old. Explain exactly what you hope to accomplish with this gambit of yours. How will town react? How will scum react? How do you account for false positives, and what percent chance do you feel it has of working?
Lots of players here know me as somebody who has done quite a few gambits, including claiming scum as scum, so from one gambit guy to another, tell me what you want out of this.,
In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.
In post 101, Cabd wrote:Sakura, you have until page 15 to be obvtown.
Ffery has until the end of this page to form a townbloc.
And notsci, you seem vaguely more interested in this game than some of your recent finished ones. You scum bro?
In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.
ffery/GM, thoughts on these two? Notsci, do you agree with cliche-read?
In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
These quotes basically give me a gut feeling of scum.
It's like you're constantly using psychology to put yourself in the Town driving seat and I just get a bad feeling from it.
I don't. Not yet anyway. Do you think Cabd is scum?
Up to this post, you've been pretty opaque and non-interactive.
Another way to ask you the question I meant was: why don't you think Cabd is scum?
IME, Cabd does the narrative control thing as both (probably all) alignments. It's not alignment indicative. I am still trying to figure out what in his play
is
alignment indicative.
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
In post 149, agi102 wrote:I am familiar with any and all strategies, but I don't remember everything about them. That's why I can't scum hunt effectively.
Just saying.
Don't worry about strategies. Just think motivation. Why do people say and do things?
oh.
T S O wrote:
gut feeling of scum
I don't like gut votes. You have no good reason to back it up besides "I felt he was scum". We're supposed to prove they're scum, right? Using things that could or could not be sarcastic to prove scum isn't a good idea. But I don't hate them so much that I'm going to vote them. What if it's a Cop or Tracker hinting at results (but not willing to claim) anyway? But I'm not liking T S O regardless.
Last edited by Malakittens on Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
